Can there be an input from philosophical debates on a better use of nature? Towards an improvement of nature rights in environmental economics

Authors

  • Ernst-August Nuppenau Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345881

Keywords:

Rights to nature, institutions, discourses on public assignment

Abstract


This contribution will deal with granting rights to nature. We will define rights of nature as a social process of creating institutions which are linked to philosophical discourses on perceptions of nature. The idea is to use different narratives in order to understand how rights of nature have been and can be accomplished/derived by humans. Then we will give hints for future directions of right detection embedded in eco-systems. We will specifically focus on the right derivation needed for contracting with nature. We take the beaver, the wolf and the black tern as examples and generalize on case specific findings. All of them need habitats and landscapes in which they can live. The message is that landscapes and habitats are part of rights of nature and that they must be also addressed beyond individual species. Additionally, we will use different strains of thought to get hints on a practical establishing of rights of nature.

 

|Abstract
= 858 veces | PDF
= 55 veces| | HTML
= 5 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Ernst-August Nuppenau, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen

studied agriculture and economy at the University of Kiel (Germany). PhD in agricultural sciences at the University of Kiel. He has been a visiting researcher at Zimbabwe and Wageningen Universities. Since 1999 is professor at the Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen (Germany) of “Agricultural and Environmental Policy”.

References

Anderson-Gold. S. (2001). Unnecessary evil. History and moral progress in the theory of Kant. State University of New York Press.

Binmore, K. (2005). Nature justice. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780195178111.001.0001

Bromley, D. W. (2006). The economic dynamics of environmental law. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 770–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8276.2006.00895_3.x

Bromley, D.W. (2012). Environmental governance as stochastic belief updating crafting rules to live by. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04774-170314

Dorresteijn, I., Milcu, A. J., Leventon, J., Hanspach, J. & Fischer Ambio, J. (2016). Social factors mediating human–carnivore coexistence: understanding thematic strands influencing coexistence in Central Romania. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 45(4), 490-500.

Gamborg, C. (2001). Sustainability and biodiversity: ethical perspectives on forest management (PhD. Thesis). University of Copenhagen. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/13035957/Christian_Gamborg.pdf#page=146

Hanna, S., Folke K. & Mäler, G. (1996). Rights to nature: culture, ecological economics, political principles of institutions for the environment. Island Press.

Krauss, W. (2006). The natural and cultural landscape heritage of Northern Friesland. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(1), 39-52.

Libecap, G. D. (1990). Contracting for property rights. In: T. L. Anderson & F. S. McChesney (Ed.), Property rights: cooperation, conflict and law (pp. 142-167). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664120

Lauer, C. (2016). Confronting the anthropocene: Schelling and Lucretius on receiving nature’s gift. Journal of Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 8(2), 160-179. https://doi.org /10.1080/17570638.2016.1200317

Lustig, B. A. (1991). Natural law, property, and justice: the general justification of property in John Locke. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 19(1) 119-149.

Marsden, T. & Smith, E. (2005). Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding. Geoforum, 36(4), 440-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.008

McIntosh, D. (2010). The transhuman security dilemma. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21(2), 32-48.

Meriggi, A. & Lovari, S. (1996). A review of wolf predation in southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(6), 1561-1571. https://doi. org/10.2307/2404794

Moline, J. N. (1986). Aldo Leopold and the moral community. Environmental Ethics, 8(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19868222

Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics. Madision.

Prasad, B. C. & Tisdell, C. (1996). Getting property rights “right”: land tenure in Fiji. Pacific

Economic Bulletin, 11(1), 31-39.

Quilley, S. (2009). The land ethic as an ecological civilizing process: Aldo Leopold, Norbert Elias, and Environmental Philosophy. Environmental Ethics, 31(2), 115-134. https://doi. org/10.5840/enviroethics200931215

Raftopoulos, M. & Powska, R. (Eds.). (2017). Natural resource development and human rights in Latin America: state and non-state actors in the promotion and opposition to extractivism activities. Denmark. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/291002023/Nat_Res_ Dev_and_HR.pdf

Serres, M. (1995). The natural contracts. An Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9725

Schleupner, C. & Link, P. M. (2008). Potential impacts on important bird habitats in Eiderstedt (Schleswig-Holstein) caused by agricultural land use changes. Applied Geography, 28(4), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.04.001

Schüßler, R. (2000). Zur konvergenz von moral und eigeninterresse. In: K. Hammacher, I. Reimers- Tovote, M. Walter (Eds.),

Zur aktualität der ethikc spinozas. Schriftenreihe der Spinoza gesellschaft. Bd.7 (pp. 212-239). Würzburg.

Reimers-Tovote, M. Walter (Eds.), Zur aktualität der ethikc spinozas. Schriftenreihe der Spinoza gesellschaft. Bd.7 (pp. 212-239). Würzburg.

Sheldrake, R. (1996). The rebirth of nature: the greening of science and God. Rochester. Smith, H. E. (2002). Exclusion versus governance: two strategies for delineating property rights.

The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(2), 453-487. https://doi.org/10.1086/344529

Spaemann, R & Loew, R. (2005). Natuerliche ziele. Geschichte und wiederentdeckung des teleologischen denkens. Klett Cotta.

Spangenberg, J. H., van Haaren, C., Settele, J. (2014). The ecosystem service cascade: further

developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics, 104, 22-32. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025

Steppacher, R. & Gerber, J. F. (2012). Meanings and significance of property with reference to today’s three major eco-institutional crisis. In: J. F. Gerber & R. Steppacher (Eds.), Towards an integrated paradigm in heterodox economics. Alternative approaches to the current eco-social crisis (pp. 111-123). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230361850_6

Stoynov, E. & Peschev, H. (2014). Reintroduction of griffon vulture gyps fulvus in kresna Gorge of Struma River. Annual Report 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Emilian_Stoynov/publication/269691140_Re-introduction_of_Griffon_Vulture_ Gyps_fulvus_in_Kresna_Gorge_of_Struma_River_Bulgaria_Annual_Report_2013/ links/5491b95f0cf269b048616b49.pdf

Tozer, D.C., Steele, O. & Gloutney, M. (2018). Multispecies benefits of wetland conservation for marsh birds, frogs, and species at risk. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.055

van der Winden, J. & van Horssen, P.W. (2008). A population model for the black tern Chlidonias niger in West-Europe. Journal of Ornithology, 149, 487–494. 10.1007/s10336-008-0292-z

Xiang, W.-N. (2014). Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning: ecological wisdom for urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 65–69. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.008

Yang, B. & Li, S. (2016). Design with nature: Ian McHarg’s ecological wisdom as actionable and practical knowledge. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 21–32. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.010

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Nuppenau, E.-A. (2022). Can there be an input from philosophical debates on a better use of nature? Towards an improvement of nature rights in environmental economics. Estudios De Filosofía, (65), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345881

Issue

Section

Dossier ¿To whom does nature belong?

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.