The inner borders of pragmatism: toward a Rortyan reading of Peirce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.362002Keywords:
Pragmatism, Richard Rorty, Charles S. Peirce, antirepresentationalism, contingency, concrete reasonableness, final opinion/final vocabularyAbstract
This paper examines the dialogue between “hard” and “soft” pragmatism, represented respectively by Charles S. Peirce and Richard Rorty, with the aim of tracing—and in part transcending—key divisions running across the pragmatist tradition. It highlights central divergences, notably between Peirce’s account of the relation between practice and reality, alongside his notion of the final opinion, and Rorty’s antirepresentationalist reworking of “concrete reasonableness” around the concept of contingency. At the same time, both thinkers converge in linking reason with feeling or sentiment, particularly through Peirce’s framing of esthetics as a normative science—a perspective that may, from a Rortyan viewpoint, be understood as rethinking the cultural role of scientific practice. By exploring these tensions and continuities, the study outlines a broader conceptual space where reason and practice jointly foster progress, understood as an ongoing effort toward self-transcendence. In doing so, it offers a renewed appreciation of pragmatism’s contemporary relevance across ethics, aesthetics, and social thought.
Downloads
References
Abrams, J. (2002). Philosophy after the mirror of nature: Rorty, Dewey, and Peirce on pragma-tism and metaphor, Metaphor and Symbol, 17(3), 227–242. Https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1703_4
Calcaterra, R. (2019). Contingency and Normativity: The Challenges of Richard Rorty. Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393837
Colapietro, V. (2011). Richard Rorty as Peircean Pragmatist: An Ironic Portrait and Sincere Expression of Philosophical Friendship, Pragmatism Today, 2(1), 31–50.
Haack, S. (1993). Philosophy/Philosophy, an Untenable Dualism, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29(3), 411–426.
Hookway, C. (1997). Sentiment and Self-Control. In J. Brunning & P. Forster (eds.), The rule of reason: The philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce (pp. 201–222). University of Toron-to Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442682276-013
Hookway, C. (2002). Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256586.001.0001
Huetter-Almerigi, Y. (2020). Two forms of realism: Making sense of Rorty’s controversy with Brandom and Ramberg over objectivity. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1868
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Legg, C. (1999). Real law in Charles Peirce’s ‘pragmaticism’ (Or: How scholastic realism met the scientific method). In H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and laws of nature: Australasian stu-dies in history and philosophy of science (Vol. 14, pp. 125–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1_11
Liszka, J. (2017). Peirce’s Esthetics as a Science of Ideal Ends, Cognitio, 18(2), 205–229. Https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p205-229
Llanera, T. (2020). Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45058-8
Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A story of ideas in America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Misak, C. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1960a). Peirce, C. S. (1960a). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–2, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1960b). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. V (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, eds). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1960c). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VI (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, eds). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1960d). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VIII (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, eds). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1986). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 3 (1872-1878) (E. Moore, C. Kloesel, M. Fisch et al., eds). Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1993). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 5 (1884-1886) (E. Moore, C. Kloesel, M. Fisch et al., eds). Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2 (1893-1913) (N. Houser, C. Kloesel, eds.). Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (2010). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Vol. 8 (1890-1892) (E. Moore, C. Kloesel, M. Fisch et al., eds). Indiana University Press.
Rescher, N. (2005). Pragmatism at the Crossroads, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce So-ciety, 41(2), 355–365.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 1972-1980). University of Minnesota Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397
Rorty, R. (1991a). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643
Rorty, R. (1991b). Essays on Heidegger and others: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 2). Cam-bridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609039
Rorty, R. (1992). Lire Rorty. Le Pragmatisme et ses conséquences (J.-P. Cometti, ed.). Édi-tions de l’éclat.
Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625404
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin Books.
Rorty, R. (2000). “Response to Ramberg,” in R. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics (pp. 370–377). Blackwell Publishers.
Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812835
Rorty, R. (2014). Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy: Early Philosophical Papers (S. Leach, J. Tartaglia, eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626538
Rorty, R. (2021). Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism (E. Mendieta, R. Brandom, eds.). Har-vard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv33mgbns
Voparil, C. (2011). Reading Rorty Politically, Filozofia, 66(10), 963–970.
Voparil, C. (2022). Reconstructing Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and the Classical Pragmatists. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.2022.a886448
White, R. (2013). Pragmatism after Humanism: Peirce, Rorty, and Realism, Arizona Quarterly, 69(4), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2013.0025
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.; Rev. 4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Etienne Raduly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
