The Effect of Economic Perceptions on Non-Conventional Political Participation in Chile in 2015

Authors

  • Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini Electoral Political Observatory, Diego Portales University
  • Patricio Navia Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies of the New York University, United StatesFaculty of Social Sciences and History of the Diego Portales University, Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-8393

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n52a04

Keywords:

Political Participation, Political Behavior, Economic Vote, Chile

Abstract

In analyzing the determinants of conventional political participation, this article highlights the effect of the economic vote and assesses its effect on nonconventional political participation. Using the UNDP-Human Development 2015 poll in Chile, the study assesses the effect of the economic vote —in its sociotropic, egotropic, retrospective and prospective dimensions— on non-conventional participation. The article uses factor analysis as a methodological mechanism to group non-conventional participation into three types, individual, collective, and online. Using OLS and logistic regressions, the article reports that non-conventional participation increases with better retrospective egotropic perception, decreases with better socio-tropic retrospective perception and is not affected by ego and sociotropic prospective perceptions. In conclusion, retrospective perceptions explain non-conventional participation, positively in the case of egotropic perceptions and negatively in case of socio-tropic perceptions. When people believe they have fared well, they participate more, but when they believe the country has fared well, they participate less.

|Abstract
= 405 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 43 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 260 veces| | VISOR XML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini, Electoral Political Observatory, Diego Portales University

Political Scientist. Coordinator of the Electoral Political Observatory of the Diego Portales University

Patricio Navia , Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies of the New York University, United StatesFaculty of Social Sciences and History of the Diego Portales University, Chile

B.A. in Political Science and Sociology. M.A. and PhD. in Political Sciences. Clinical Professor of Liberal Studies and Associate Professor of the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University, United States. Professor of Political Science in the Faculty of Social Sciences and History of the Diego Portales University, Chile.

http://patricionavia.com/

References

(1) Abitbol, Pablo y Felipe Botero. (2006). Teoría de elección racional: estructura conceptual y evolución reciente. Colombia International, 62, pp. 132-145.

(2) Alesina, Alberto & La Ferrara, Elinana. (2000). The Determinants of Trust. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 7621. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7621

(3) Alesina, Alberto; Hausmann, Ricardo; Hommes, Rudolf & Stein, Ernesto. (1999). Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America. Journal of Development Economics, 59 (2), pp. 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00012-7

(4) Almond, Gabriel A. & Verba, Sidney. (2001). La cultura política. En: Batlle, Albert (ed.). Diez textos básicos de Ciencia Política (pp. 171-201). Barcelona: Ariel.

(5) Amadae, S. M. (2005). Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem and the National Security State. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36 (4), pp. 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.012

(6) Bennett, W. Lance. (2008). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. In: W. Lance Bennett (ed.). Civic Life Online: Learning how Digital Media can Engage Youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: The MIT.

(7) Brady, Henry; Lehman Schlozman, Kay & Verba, Sidney. (2012). The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University.

(8) Brody, Richard A. (1994). Bildung, politische Toleranz und Demokratie-eine Untersuchung. In: Grundwerte der Demokratie un Internationalen Verfleich. Bonn: BZPB.

(9) Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Thery. Massachusetts: Harvard University.

(10) Downs, Anthony. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

(11) Eisinga, Rob; Grotenhuis, Manfred te & Pelzer, Ben. (2013). The Reliability of a Two-Item Scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58 (4), pp. 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3

(12) Erikson, Robert; MacKuen, Michael y Stimson, James. (2000). Bankers or Peasants Revisited: Economic Expectations and Presidential Approval. Electoral Studies, 19 (2-3), pp. 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00053-0

(13) Fiorina, Morris. (1978). Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22 (2), pp. 426-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110623

(14) Freitag, Markus. (2003). Social Capital in (Dis) Similar Democracies The Development of Generalized Trust in Japan and Switzerland. Comparative Political Studies, 36 (8), pp. 936-966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003256116

(15) Fuchs, Dieter & Klingemann, H. D. (2002). Eastward Enlargement of the European Union and the Identity of Europe. West European Politics, 25 (2), pp. 19-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/713869598

(16) Garmendia, María Luisa. (2007). Análisis factorial: una aplicacion en el cuestionario de salud general de Goldberg, version de 12 preguntas. Revista Chilena de Salud Pública, 11 (2), pp. 57-65.

(17) Inglehart, Ronald & Catterberg, Gabriela. (2002). Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43 (3-5), pp. 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/002071520204300305

(18) Inglehart, Ronald. (1990). Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University.

(19) Kim, Jae-On & Mueller, Charles. (1978). Factor Analysys. Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Newbury Park: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984256

(20) Kramer, Gerald. (1971). Short Term Fluctuation in U.S. Voting Behavior 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 63 (1), pp. 131-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955049

(21) Lewis-Beck, Michael & Paldam, Martin. (2000). Economic Voting an Introduction. Electoral Studies, 19 (2-3), pp. 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00042-6

(22) Lewis-Beck, Michael & Stegmaier, Mary. (2007). Economic Models of Voting. In: Dalton, Rusell & Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 518-537). Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0027

(23) Lewis-Beck, Michael and Mary Stegmaier. (2013). The VP-Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years. Public Choice, 157 (3), pp. 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0086-6

(24) Lewis-Beck, Michael. (1986). Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Poltical Sciences, 30 (2), pp. 315-346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111099

(25) Muller, Edward & Godwin, Kenneth. (1984). Democratic and Aggressive Political Participation: Estimation of Nonrecursive Model. Political Behavior, 6 (2), pp. 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207758

(26) Neira, Isabel; Vázquez, Emilia & Portela, Marta. (2009). An Empirical Analisys of Social Capital and Economic Growth in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 92 (1), pp. 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9292-x

(27) Newton, K. (1999). Socia and Political Trust in Established Democracies. In: Norris, Pippa (ed.). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 169-187). Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.003.0008

(28) Norris, Pippa. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism: Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610073

(29) Norris, Pippa. (2007). Political Activism: New Challenges, New Opportunities. In: Boix, Carles & Stokes, Susan C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 628-652). Princeton: Princeton University.

(30) Paxton, Pamela. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment 1. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (1), pp. 88-127. https://doi.org/10.1086/210268

(31) Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). (2015). Desarrollo humano en Chile 2015. Los tiempos de la politización. Santiago de Chile: PNUD.

(32) Putnam, Robert D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), pp. 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

(33) Segovia, Carolina; Haye, Andrés; González, Roberto; Manzi, Jorge & Carvacho, Héctor. (2008). Confianza en instituciones políticas en Chile: un modelo de los componentes centrales de juicios de confianza. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 28 (2), pp. 39-60. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2008000200002

(34) Shepsle, Kenneth & Bonchek, Mark. (2005). Las fórmulas de la política. Instituciones, racionalidad y comportamiento. México, D. F.: Santillana.

(35) Treiman, Donald. (2009). Scale Construction. In: Quantitative Data Analysis: Doing Social Research to Test Ideas (pp. 241-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

(36) Verba, Sidney & Nie, Norman H. (1972). Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago.

(37) Verba, Sidney; Nie, Norman H. & Kim, Jae-On. (1978). Participation and Political Equality. New York: Cambridge University.

(38) Welch, Susan & Comer, John. (1988). Quantitative Methods for Public Administration: Techniques and Applications. New York: Cole Publishing Co.

Published

2018-01-31

How to Cite

Espinoza Bianchini, G., & Navia , P. . (2018). The Effect of Economic Perceptions on Non-Conventional Political Participation in Chile in 2015. Estudios Políticos, (52), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n52a04

Issue

Section

General Section Articles