Teoría democrática deliberativa y ciencia política empírica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n56a12Palabras clave:
Democracia Deliberativa, Igualdad, Participación, Legitimidad, PublicidadResumen
Si bien en la década pasada [década de 1990] proliferaron los estudios empíricos sobre democracia deliberativa, pocos de ellos se ocuparon de las cuestiones más importantes de las teorías normativas. Al mismo tiempo, muchos teóricos de la democracia deliberativa desecharon rápidamente los hallazgos empíricos. Solo recientemente, algunos teóricos y empíricos han comenzado a prestar más atención al trabajo realizado por unos y otros. Sin embargo, no parece que esta atención baste para producir la comprensión que necesitamos de la democracia deliberativa; para ello hace falta que los teóricos y los investigadores empíricos desarrollen una mejor concepción de los elementos de la deliberación, los conflictos entre estos elementos y las relaciones estructurales de los sistemas deliberativos.
Descargas
Citas
(1) Ackerman, Bruce & Fishkin, James. (2004). Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University.
(2) Bächtiger, André & Steiner, Jürg. (2005). Introduction. Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 153-168. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500108
(3) Bächtiger, André; Spörndli, Markus; Steenbergen, Marco & Steiner, Jürg. (2007). Deliberation in Legislatures: Antecedents and Autcomes. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 82-100). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_5
(4) Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. (2003). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment. In: Fung, Archon & Wright. Erik Olin. (2003). Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance (pp. 45-76). London and New York: Verso.
(5) Barabas, Jason. (2004). How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions. American Political Science Review, 98 (4), pp. 687-701. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404041425
(6) Benhabib, Seyla (ed.). (1996). Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University.
(7) Besson, Samantha & Marti, José Luis (eds.). (2006). Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. Hampshire: Ashgate.
(8) Blais, André; Carty, R. Kenneth & Fournier, Patrick. (2008). Do Citizens’ Assemblies Make Reasoned Choices? In: Warren, Mark & Pearse, Hilary (eds.). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 127-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491177.008
(9) Bohman, James. (1998). Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (4), pp. 400-425. [Traducción al castellano de Leonardo García. (2016). Co-herencia. Revista de Humanidades, 13 (24), pp. 105-143].
(10) Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.). (1997). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001
(11) Button, Mark & Mattson, Kevin. (1999). Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation. Polity, 31 (4), pp. 609-637. DOI: 10.2307/3235238
(12) Chambers, Simone. (1996). Reasonable Democracy: Jurgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University.
(13) Chambers, Simone. (1998). Contract or Conversation: Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis. Politics & Society, 26 (1), pp. 143-172. DOI: 10.1177/0032329298026001006
(14) Chambers, Simone. (2004). Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy and the Quality of Deliberation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (4), pp. 389-410. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x
(15) Chambers, Simone. (2005). Measuring Publicity’s Effect: Reconciling Empirical Research and Normative Theory. Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 255-266. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500104
(16) Cohen, Joshua. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: Hamlin, Alan & Pettit, Philip (eds.). The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State (pp. 17-34). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
(17) Cohen, Joshua. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 67-91). Cambridge: MIT.
(18) Cohen, Joshua. (2007). Deliberative Democracy. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 219-36). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_10
(19) Cohen, Joshua & Fung, Archon. (2004). Radical Democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 10 (4), pp. 23-43.
(20) Conover, Pamela Johnston & Searing, Donald D. (2005). Studying «Everyday Political Talk» in the Deliberative System. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 269-283. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500113
(21) Cook, Fay Lomax & Delli Carpini, Michael X. & Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2007). Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 25-44). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_2
(22) Curtin, Deirdre. (2006). Framing Public Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union. In: Besson, Samantha & Marti, José Luis (eds.). (2006). Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents (pp. 133-156). Hampshire: Ashgate.
(23) Della Porta, Donatella. (2005). Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 336-350. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500116
(24) Delli Carpini, Michael X.; Cook, Fay Lomax & Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, pp. 315-344. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
(25) Druckman, James N. & Nelson, Kjersten R. (2003). Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47 (4), pp. 729-745. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00051
(26) Dryzek, John S. (2006). Deliberative Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
(27) Dryzek, John S. (2007). Theory, Evidence, and the Tasks of Deliberation. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 237-250). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_11
(28) Dryzek, John S. & Braithwaite, Valerie. (2000). On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics. Political Psychology, 21 (2), pp. 241-266. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00186
(29) Elster, Jon. (ed.) (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139175005
(30) Esterling, Kevin M.; Neblo, Michael A. & Lazer, David. (2007). Means, Motive, & Opportunity in Becoming Informed About Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1301772
(31) Estlund, David. (1997). Beyond Fairness and Deliberation. In: Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 173-204). Cambridge: MIT.
(32) Fishkin, James. (1999). Toward a Deliberative Democracy: Experimenting with an Ideal. In: Elkin, Stephen; Soltan, Karol Edward (eds.). Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (pp. 279-290). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
(33) Fishkin, James & Laslett, Peter (eds.). (2003). Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470690734
(34) Fishkin, James & Luskin, Robert C. (2005). Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 284-298. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
(35) Fung, Archon. (2007a). Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement. American Political Science Review, 101 (3), pp. 443-458. DOI: 10.1017/S000305540707030X
(36) Fung, Archon. (2007b). MiniPublics. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 159-183). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_8
(37) Fung, Archon & Wright. Erik Olin. (2003). Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London and New York: Verso.
(38) Gastil, John & Levine, Peter. (2005). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(39) Goodin, Robert E. (1992). Motivating Political Morality. Oxford: Blackwell.
(40) Goodin, Robert E. (1995). Political Ideals and Political Practice. British Journal of Political Science, 25, pp. 37-56. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400007055
(41) Goodin, Robert E. (2005). Sequencing Deliberative Moments. Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 182-196. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500098
(42) Goodin, Robert E. & Dryzek, John S. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society, 34 (2), pp. 219-244. DOI: 10.1177/0032329206288152
(43) Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Dennis. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University.
(44) Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Dennis. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University. DOI: 10.1515/9781400826339
(45) Habermas, Jürgen. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon.
(46) Habermas, Jürgen. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT.
(47) Habermas, Jürgen. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
(48) Habermas, Jürgen. (2005). Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 384-392. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500119
(49) Habermas, Jürgen. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16 (4), pp. 411-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
(50) Hibbing, John R. & Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613722
(51) Holzinger, Katharina. (2005). Context or Conflict Types: Which Determines the Selection of Communication Mode. Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 239-254. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500100
(52) Jackman, Simon & Sniderman, Paul M. (2006). The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments. The Journal of Politics, 68 (2), pp. 272-283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00405.x
(53) Janssen, Davy & Kies, Raphaël. (2005). Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 317-335. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115
(54) Karpowitz, Christopher. (2003). Public Hearings and the Dynamics of Democracy: A Case Study. Annual Meeting Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
(55) Knight, Jack & Johnson, James. (1997). What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require? In: Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 279-320). Cambridge: MIT.
(56) Macedo, Stephen (ed.). (1999). Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Princeton: Princeton University.
(57) Mackie, Gerry. (2006). Does democratic deliberation change minds? Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 5 (3), pp. 279-303. DOI: 10.1177/1470594X06068301
(58) Mansbridge, Jane. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic.
(59) Mansbridge, Jane. (2007). «Deliberative Democracy» or «Democratic Deliberation»? In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 251-271). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_12
(60) Marti, José Luis. (2006). The Epistemic Conception of Democracy Defended. In: Besson, Samantha & Marti, José Luis (eds.). (2006). Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents (pp. pp. 27-56). Hampshire: Ashgate.
(61) Mendelberg, Tali. (2002). The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence. In: Delli Carpini, Michael X; Huddy, Leonie & Shapiro, Robert (eds.). Research in Micropolitics: Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation, Vol. 6 (pp. 151-193). Greenwich: JAI.
(62) Mendelberg, Tali & Oleske, John. (2000). Race and Public Deliberation. Political Communication, 17 (2), pp. 169-191. DOI: 10.1080/105846000198468
(63) Mucciaroni, Gary & Quirk, Paul J. (2006). Deliberative Choices. Debating Public Policy in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago.
(64) Mutz, Diana C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative vs Participatory Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511617201
(65) Mutz, Diana C. (2008). Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp. 521-538. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
(66) Nanz, Patrizia & Steffek, Jens. (2005). Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies. Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 368-383. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500118
(67) Neblo, Michael A. (2005). Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics. Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 169-181. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500102
(68) Neblo, Michael A. (2007a). Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation. The Swiss Political Science Review, 13 (4), pp. 527-557. DOI: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00088.x
(69) Neblo, Michael A. (2007b). Change for the Better? Linking the Mechanisms of Deliberative Opinion Change to Normative Theory. Annual Meeting International Society of Political Psychology, Toronto.
(70) O’Flynn, Ian. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and Divided Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621446.001.0001
(71) Parkinson, John. (2006). Deliberating in the Real World. Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University. DOI: 10.1093/019929111X.001.0001
(72) Pateman, Carole. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511720444
(73) Richardson, Henry. (2003). Democratic Autonomy. Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. New York: Oxford University.
(74) Risse, Thomas. (2000). «Let’s Argue!»: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54 (1), pp. 1-39. DOI: 10.1162/002081800551109
(75) Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). (2007a). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080
(76) Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). (2007b). Types of Discourse and the Democracy of Deliberation. In: Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 130-158). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_7
(77) Ryfe, David Michael. (2002). The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Study of 16 Deliberative Organizations. Political Communication, 19 (3), pp. 359-378. DOI: 10.1080/01957470290055547
(78) Ryfe, David Michael. (2005). Does Deliberative Democracy Work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, pp. 49-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
(79) Schimmelfennig, Frank. (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55 (1), pp. 47-80. DOI: 10.1162/002081801551414
(80) Spörndli, Markus. (2004). Diskurs und Entscheidung. Eine empirische Analyse kommunikativen Handelns im deuatschenVermittlungsausschuss. [PhD dissertation]. University of Bern. Weisbaden: VS Verlag für Soz.wiss. Summarized in: Steiner, Jürg; Bächtiger, André; Spörndli, Markus & Steenbergen, Marco. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Crossnational Study of Parliamentary Debates (pp. 157-162). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(81) Steiner, Jürg; Bächtiger, André; Spörndli, Markus & Steenbergen, Marco. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Crossnational Study of Parliamentary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491153
(82) Sulkin, Tracy & Simon, Adam. (2001). Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting. Political Psychology, 22 (4), pp. 809-826. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00263
(83) Sunstein, Cass. (2002). The Law of Group Polarization. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10 (2), pp. 175-195. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9760.00148
(84) Thompson, Dennis F. (1970). The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
(85) Thompson, Dennis F. (2008). Who Should Govern Who Governs? The Role of Citizens in Reforming the Electoral System. In: Warren, Mark & Pearse, Hilary (eds.). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 20–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491177.003
(86) Ulbert, Cornelia & Risse, Thomas. (2005). Deliberately Changing the Discourse: What Does Make Arguing Effective? Acta Politica, 40 (3), pp. 351-367. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500117
(87) Walsh, Katherine Cramer. (2003). Talking about Politics. Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226872216.001.0001
(88) Walsh, Katherine Cramer. (2007). The Democratic Potential of Civic Dialogue. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 45-63). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_3
(89) Warren, Mark E. (2007). Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 272-288). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_13
(90) Warren, Mark & Pearse, Hilary (eds.). (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491177
(91) Weale, Albert; Bicquelet, Aude & Bara, Judith. (2007). Debating Abortion, Deliberative Reciprocity and Parliamentary Advocacy. Working Paper, Department of Government, University of Essex.
(92) Weatherford, M. Stephen & McDonnell, Lorraine M. (2007). Deliberation with a Purpose: Reconnecting Communities and Schools. In: Rosenberg, Shawn (ed.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 184-215). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230591080_9
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Estudios Políticos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Estudios Políticos autoriza la copia de artículos y textos únicamente con fines académicos, bajo la condición ineludible de citar la fuente. Para la reproducción total o parcial de la Revista con otros fines, se debe contar con la autorización explícita del Instituto de Estudios Políticos de la Universidad de Antioquia, previa consulta al correo electrónico revistaepoliticos@udea.edu.co
Los autores son los titulares de los derechos morales de sus artículos y pueden archivar y divulgar citando la fuente. Estudios Políticos asume los derechos de reproducción.
El material creado por usted puede ser distribuido, copiado y exhibido por terceros si se muestra en los créditos. No se puede obtener ningún beneficio comercial y las obras derivadas tienen que estar bajo los mismos términos de licencia que el trabajo original.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
