Study of the Bonds Established at Social Programs Implementation in Cali, Colombia, Using the Contextual Interaction Theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n63a04

Keywords:

public politics, implementation, social programs, social bonds, contextual interaction theory, Colombia

Abstract

This study aims to research the contextual interaction processes set during the implementation of four social programs in Cali. The purpose of this is to identify the social bonds and the approaches to social programs that are configured at the implementation level between the different actors involved. The four programs to be analyzed were selected following a typology where they can be compared according to the degree of interaction and the homogeneity in the tasks involved. Therefore, the chosen programs were studied through 14 semi-directed interviews conducted with the stakeholders: public officials, community-based intermediaries, and beneficiaries. The main results highlight the challenge that the diversity of the communities set to the programs. These are all complex situations that question the totalizing role of the institution within the resolution of the community’s problems, and that open spaces to other approaches, such as the governance, where implementation interfaces located in the same communities of the intervention, on the edge of the limits of the State.

|Abstract
= 770 veces | HTML (ENGLISH) (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 135 veces| | PDF (ENGLISH) (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 139 veces| | VISOR XML (ENGLISH) (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 1 veces| | XHTML (ENGLISH) (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 4 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrea Peroni , University of Chile

BA. in Sociology. Professor of History. MA. in Social Sciences. PhD. in American Studies. Teacher of the Department of Sociology, University of Chile.

 

Bairon Otálvaro, Valle University

Bachelor of Social Work. MA. in Public Policies. Doctor. in Political Studies and International Relations. Professor of the Department of Administration and Organizations, Valle University, Colombia.

 

Francisco Ulloa Osses, University of Chile

BA. in Sociology. MA. in Sociology. Teacher of the Department of Sociology, University of Chile.

Cesia Morales Balmaceda, Popular university of Cesar

BA. in Sociology.

References

(1) Andréu Abela, Jaime. (2001). Técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Sevilla: Centro de Estudios Andaluces.

(2) Baviskar, Siddhartha &Winter, Søren. (2016). Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth. International Public Management Journal, 20 (2), pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1235641

(3) Bardach, Eugene. (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge: MIT Studies in American Politics and Public Policy.

(4) Bardach, Eugene. (1995). The Implementation Game. In: Theodoulou, Stella Z. & Cahn, Matthew A. Public Policy: The Essential Readings (pp. 137-139). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

(5) Bisquerra, Rafael. (1989). Métodos de investigación educativa: guía práctica. Barcelona: CEAC.

(6) Bressers, Hans. (2004). Implementing Sustainable Development: How to Know What Works, Where, When and How. In: Lafferty, William M. (Ed.). Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function (pp. 284-318). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

(7) Castel, Robert. (2010). Una gran transformación. In: El ascenso de las incertidumbres. Trabajo, protecciones, estatus del individuo (pp. 15-57). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

(8) Cleaves, Peter. (1974). Bureaucratic Politics and Administration in Chile. Berkeley: University of California. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520317475

(9) Díaz, Sergio; Mendoza, Víctor & Porras, Cecilia. (2011). Una guía para la elaboración de estudio de caso. Razón y Palabra, 75. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/N/N75/varia_75/01_Diaz_V75.pdf

(10) Edelman, Murray. (1991). La construcción del espectáculo político. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

(11) Eslava, Adolfo. (2010). Análisis neoinstitucional de políticas públicas. In: Roth Deubel, André-Noël (Ed.). Enfoques para el análisis de políticas públicas (pp. 97-122). Bogotá, D. C.: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

(12) Flick, Uwe. (2002). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.

(13) Javakhishvilo, Nino & Jibladze, Gvantsa. (2018). Analysis of Anti-Domestic Violence Policy Implementation in Georgia Using Contextual Interaction Theory (CIT). Journal of Social Policy, 47 (2), pp. 317 - 334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000551

(14) Jenkins, William. (1978) Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective. London: Martin Robertson.

(15) Lindblom, Charles E. (1991). El proceso de elaboración de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerios para las Administraciones Públicas.

(16) Martínez Nogueira, Roberto. (2004). Desafíos estratégicos en la implementación de políticas sociales: Provisión, participación y coordinación. En: Cortázar Velarde, Juan Carlos (Ed.). Entre el diseño y la evaluación (pp. 63-116). Buenos Aires: UBA.

(17) Misas Arango, Gabriel. (2006). Régimen Político, corrupción y organizaciones criminales. En: Cárdenas, Miguel & Ricardo Bonilla (Coords.). Políticas públicas para Colombia. Bogotá, D. C.: Cerec-Fescol.

(18) Muller, Pierre. (2006). Las políticas públicas. Bogotá, D. C.: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

(19) Muthathi, Immaculate & Rispel, Laetitia. (2020). Policy Context, Coherence and Disjuncture in the Implementation of the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance Programme in the Gauteng and Mpumalanga Provinces of South Africa. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18 (55). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00567-z

(20) O’Toole, Ciara & Kirkpatrick, Vickie. (2007). Building Collaboration between Professionals in Health and Education through Interdisciplinary Training. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659007080685

(21) Owens, Katharine & Bressers, Hans. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of How Actors Implement: Testing the Contextual Interaction Theory in 48 Cases of Wetland Restoration. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785668

(22) Peroni, Andrea. (2014). Implementación de programas sociales. Perspectivas y dinámicas que se configuran en el espacio de la interfaz. Comparación Argentina-Chile. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago.

(23) Peters, B. Guy. (2014). Implementation Structures as Institutions. Public Policy and Administration, 29 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713517733

(24) Pressman, Jeffrey & Wildavsky, Aaron. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Oakland: University of California.

(25) Rojas, Rodrigo; Leiva, Loreto; Vargas, Ana María & Squicciarini-Navarro, Ana María (2017). Efectos de la fidelidad de la implementación sobre los resultados de una intervención preventiva en salud mental escolar: un análisis multinivel. Psychosocial Intervention, 26 (3), pp. 147-154. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2016.12.002

(26) Roth Deubel, André-Nöel. (2009). La evaluación de políticas públicas en Colombia: una mirada crítica a partir de las prácticas evaluativas oficiales de los programas de la “Red de Apoyo Social”. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 45, pp. 161-186.

(27) Roth Deubel, André-Nöel. (2010). ¿Política, Programa o Proyecto? Boletín Política Pública Hoy, 8, pp. 6-9.

(28) Rubio Campos, Jesús. (2013). Retos para la implementación de políticas públicas en América Latina. Buen Gobierno, 15, pp. 146-156. https://doi.org/10.35247/buengob_15_08

(29) Sabatier, Paul. (1991). Towards Better Theories of the Policy Process. Political Science and Politics, 24 (2), pp. 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500050630

(30) Sabatier, Paul A. & Mazmanian, Daniela A. (2000). La implementación de la política pública: un marco de análisis. In: Aguilar Villanueva, Luis F. (Comp.). La implementación de las políticas públicas (pp. 323-372). México, D. F.: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

(31) Salaj, Ivona. (2017). Education Policy Implementation from the Perspective of Pupils and Students with Disabilities. Croatian Journal of Education, 19 (3). doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i0.2696

(32) Spratt, Kai. (2009). Policy Implementation Barriers Analysis: Conceptual Framework and Pilot Test in Three Countries. Washington, D. C.: Futures Group, Health Policy Initiative, Task Order 1.

(33) Stake, Robert E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In: Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

(34) Van Meter, Donald S. & Van Horn, Carl E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process a Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6 (4). https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Published

2022-03-15

How to Cite

Peroni , A., Otálvaro, B., Ulloa Osses, F., & Morales Balmaceda, C. (2022). Study of the Bonds Established at Social Programs Implementation in Cali, Colombia, Using the Contextual Interaction Theory. Estudios Políticos, (63), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n63a04

Issue

Section

General Section Articles