Identification of Candida glabrata and other common Candida species using chromogenic agar and germ tube test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.v28n4a01Keywords:
candida glabrata, candida albicans, candida tropicalis, species identificationAbstract
Introduction: Chromogenic agar and germ tube test have been used for decades to identify C. albicans. However, neither of these tests separately allows identification of C. glabrata.
Objective: To test the efficacy of chromogenic agar and germ tube test used serially to identify the most common Candida species found in clinical practice, with emphasis on C. glabrata.
Methods: 436 isolates were identified using the chromogenic medium followed by the germ tube test. Biochemical tests were used as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and confidence intervals (95 %) of the serial identification system were determined.
Results: Sensitivity was 97.9 % (IC95 %: 96.0-99.9) to identify C. albicans/dubliniensis, and 90.9 % (IC95 %: 84.0-97.8) for C. tropicalis; specificity was 100 % for both species. Sensitivity was 92.5 % (IC95 %: 86.2-98.8) for identification of C. glabrata with 96.6 % (IC95 %: 95.0- 98.6) specificity. Concerning identification of the C. parapsilosis complex, specificity was 96.3 % (IC95 %: 94.5-98.1).
Conclusion: The proposed serial scheme has adequate sensitivity and specificity for identification of C. albicans/dubliniensis, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. It could be useful in low-resources clinical settings.
Downloads
References
(1.) Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;48(5):503-35. DOI 10.1086/596757.
(2.) Pappas PG. Invasive candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006 Sep;20(3):485-506.
(3.) Rousselle P, Freydiere AM, Couillerot PJ, de Montclos H, Gille Y. Rapid identification of Candida albicans by using Albicans ID and fluoroplate agar plates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):3034-6.
(4.) Baumgartner C, Freydiere AM, Gille Y. Direct identification and recognition of yeast species from clinical material by using albicans ID and CHROMagar Candida plates. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Feb;34(2):454-6.
(5.) Quindós G, Alonso-Vargas R, Helou S, Arechavala A, Martín-Mazuelos E, Negroni R. [Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium (Candida ID) for the isolation and presumptive identification of Candida albicans and other medically important yeasts]. Rev Iberoamer Micol. 2001 Mar;18(1):23-8. Spanish.
(6.) Contreras I, San-Millán R, Agustín-Barrasa A, Pontón J, Quindós G. Utility of Albicans ID plate for rapid identification of Candida albicans in clinical samples. Rapid identification of Candida albicans. Mycopathologia. 1996 Oct;136(1):17-20.
(7.) Pfaller MA, Houston A, Coffmann S. Application of CHROMagar Candida for rapid screening of clinical specimens for Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, and Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):58-61.
(8.) Eraso E, Moragues MD, Villar-Vidal M, Sahand IH, González-Gómez N, Pontón J, et al. Evaluation of the new chromogenic medium Candida ID 2 for isolation and identification of Candida albicans and other medically important Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3340-5.
(9.) Yücesoy M, Marol S. Performance of CHROMAGAR candida and BIGGY agar for identification of yeast species. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2003 Oct;2:8.
(10.) Powell HL, Sand CA, Rennie RP. Evaluation of CHROMagar Candida for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;32(3):201-4.
(11.) Ghelardi E, Pichierri G, Castagna B, Barnini S, Ta-vanti A, Campa M. Efficacy of Chromogenic Candida Agar for isolation and presumptive identification of pathogenic yeast species. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Feb;14(2):141-7.
(12.) Hospenthal DR, Beckius ML, Floyd KL, Horvath LL, Murray CK. Presumptive identification of Candida species other than C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. tro-picalis with the chromogenic medium CHROMagar Candida. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Jan;5:1.
(13.) Griffin ER. The Value of the Germ Tube Production Test in the Rapid Identification of Candida Albicans. J Med Lab Technol. 1964 Oct;21:298-301.
(14.) Dolan CT, Ihrke DM. Further studies of the germ-tube test for Candida albicans identification. Am J Clin Pathol. 1971 Jun;55(6):733-4.
(15.) Mackenzie DW. Serum tube identification of Candida albicans. J Clin Pathol. 1962 Nov;15(6):563-5.
(16.) Hilmioglu S, Ilkit M, Badak Z. Comparison of 12 liquid media for germ tube production of Candida albicans and C. tropicalis. Mycoses. 2007 Jul;50(4):282-5.
(17.) Sheppard DC, Locas MC, Restieri C, Laverdiere M. Uti-lity of the germ tube test for direct identification of Candida albicans from positive blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Oct;46(10):3508-9. DOI 10.1128/JCM.01113-08.
(18.) Fidel PL Jr, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jan;12(1):80-96.
(19.) Lachance MA, Boekhout T, Scorzetti G, Fell JW, Kurtzman CP. Candida Berkhout (1923). In: Kurtzman C, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study. 5ª ed. New York: Elsevier; 2011. p. 987-1278.
(20.) Winn WC, Allen SD, Janda WM, Koneman EW, Procop GW, Schrenckenberger PC, et al. Identificación por laboratorio de levaduras. En: Koneman EW, Allen S. Diagnóstico Microbiológico. 6ª ed. México: Panamericana; 2008. p. 1164-70.
(21.) Alfonso C, López M, Arechavala A, Perrone Mdel C, Guelfand L, Bianchi M, et al. [Presumptive identification of Candida spp. and other clinically important yeasts: usefulness of Brilliance Candida Agar]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2010 Jun;27(2):90-3. DOI 10.1016/j.riam.2010.01.008. Spanish.
(22.) Sudbery P, Gow N, Berman J. The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2004 Jul;12(7):317-24.
(23.) Koehler AP, Chu KC, Houang ET, Cheng AF. Simple, reliable, and cost-effective yeast identification scheme for the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Feb;37(2):422-6.
(24.) Ells R, Kock JL, Pohl CH. Candida albicans or Candida dubliniensis? Mycoses. 2011 Jan;54(1):1-16. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01759.x.25. Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Gow NA, Maiden MC, Odds FC. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):284-92.
(26.) Trofa D, Gácser A, Nosanchuk JD. Candida parapsilosis, an emerging fungal pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Oct;21(4):606-25. DOI 10.1128/CMR.00013-08.
(27.) Howell SA, Hazen KC. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Vol 2. Washington: ASM Press; 2011. p. 1793-821.
(28.) TDR Diagnostics Evaluation Expert Panel, Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, Herring A, Mabey D, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Dec;8(12 Suppl):S17-29.
(29.) Cárdenes CD, Carrillo AJ, Arias A, Rodríguez-Alvarez C, Torres-Lana A, Sierra A, et al. Comparison of Albi-cans ID2 agar plate with the germ tube for presump-tive identification of Candida albicans. Diagn Micro-biol Infect Dis. 2002 Mar;42(3):181-5.
(30.) Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 2ª ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1995.
(31.) Altman D, Machin D, Bryant, Gardner M, editors. Sta-istics with Confidence. 2ª ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000.
(32.) Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Sensitivity and specificity and their confidence intervals cannot exceed 100%. BMJ. 1999 Jan;318(7177):193-4.
(33.) Harper R, Reeves B. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ. 1999 May;318(7194):1322-3.
(34.) Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Moet GJ, Jones RN. Variation in Candida spp. distribution and antifungal resistance rates among bloodstream infection isolates by patient age: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008-2009). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Nov;68(3):278-83. DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.015.
(35.) Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanhei-ra M. Geographic variations in species distribution and echinocandin and azole antifungal resistance rates among Candida bloodstream infection isolates: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jan;49(1):396-9. DOI 10.1128/JCM.01398-10.
(36.) Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Brown SD, Lockhart SR, et al. Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria. Drug Resist Updat. 2011 Jun;14(3):164-76. DOI 10.1016/j.drup.2011.01.004.
(37.) Fanello S, Bouchara JP, Sauteron M, Delbos V, Parot E, Marot-Leblond A, et al. Predictive value of oral colonization by Candida yeasts for the onset of a nosoco-mial infection in elderly hospitalized patients. J Med Microbiol. 2006 Feb;55(Pt 2):223-8.
(38.) Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, Alvarado-Matute T, Tiraboschi IN, Cortes J, Zurita J, et al. Epidemiology of candidemia in Latin America: a laboratory-based survey. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59373. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059373.
(39.) Freydière AM, Parant F, Noel-Baron F, Crepy M, Treny A, Raberin H, et al. Identification of Candida glabrata by a 30-second trehalase test. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Oct;40(10):3602-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Iatreia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Papers published in the journal are available for use under the Creative Commons license, specifically Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
The papers must be unpublished and sent exclusively to the Journal Iatreia; the author uploading the contribution is required to submit two fully completed formats: article submission and authorship responsibility.