Internal Structure of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) in Medical and Nursing Personnel in Peru: An Exploratory Graph Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.270Keywords:
Nurses, Physicians, Stress, Test ValidityAbstract
Introduction: The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), in its 14-item (PSS-14) and 10-item (PSS-10) versions, is a widely used instrument. However, it has been understudied in medical and nursing personnel, and a variety of factor structures have been reported.
Objective: To examine the internal structure of the PSS in Peruvian medical and nursing personnel using exploratory graph analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.
Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 2,848 nurses and 2,219 physicians who participated in the Peruvian Ministry of Health's ENSUSALUD in 2015 and were administered the PSS-14 and PSS-10. Analyses were performed using the EGAnet and lavaan packages in R.
Results: The PSS-14 formed 2 dimensions in medical personnel and 3 dimensions in nursing personnel, but items 12 and 13 showed little robustness in the latter group. Reanalysis after removing these items indicated that the 12-item version is plausible in nurses. Additionally, the PSS-10 showed a robust two-dimensional structure in both groups. Confirmatory factor analysis found that the two-dimensional models had good fit, as well as adequate reliability and consistency.
Conclusions: The PSS is a useful instrument for measuring stress in medical and nursing personnel. However, the PSS-10 is more appropriate; while in the PSS-14, items 12 and 13 should be omitted. Both versions are two-dimensional for both physicians and nurses.
Downloads
References
Melnyk BM. Burnout, Depression and Suicide in Nurses/Clinicians and Learners: An Urgent Call for Action to Enhance Professional Well‐being and Healthcare Safety. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs [Internet]. 2020;17(1):2–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12416
Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, Rosales RC, Guille C, Sen S, et al. Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians: A Systematic Review. JAMA [Internet]. 2018;320(11):1131. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12777
Al Maqbali M, Al Sinani M, Al-Lenjawi B. Prevalence of stress, depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res [Internet]. 2021;141:110343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110343
Yates SW. Physician Stress and Burnout. Am J Med [Internet]. 2020;133(2):160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.034
López‐López IM, Gómez‐Urquiza JL, Cañadas GR, Fuente EID, Albendín‐García L, Cañadas‐De la Fuente GA. Prevalence of burnout in mental health nurses and related factors: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Mental Health Nurs [Internet]. 2019;28(5):1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12606
Tawfik DS, Profit J, Morgenthaler TI, Satele DV, Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, et al. Physician Burnout, Well-being, and Work Unit Safety Grades in Relationship to Reported Medical Errors. Mayo Clin Proc [Internet]. 2018;93(11):1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.014
Deneva T, Ianakiev Y, Keskinova D. Burnout Syndrome in Physicians—Psychological Assessment and Biomarker Research. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2019;55(5):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050209
Herr RM, Barrech A, Riedel N, Gündel H, Angerer P, Li J. Long-term effectiveness of stress management at work: Effects of the changes in perceived stress reactivity on mental health and sleep problems seven years later. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2018;15(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020255
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. J Health Soc Behav [Internet]. 1983;24(4):385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. En: Spacaman S, Oskamp S, editores. The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology The social psychology of health. California: Sage Publications; 1988. p. 31–67. Available from: https://bit.ly/3PAeYwB
Lee EH. Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale. Asian Nurs Res [Internet]. 2012;6(4):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004
de Dios-Duarte MJ, Varela-Montero I, Braschi-Diaferia L, Sánchez-Muñoz E. Estrés en estudiantes de enfermería. Educ Med Sup [Internet]. 2017;31(3):110–123. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412017000300013
García-Araiza HJ, Hernández-Chávez L, Och-Castillo JM, Cocom-Rivera SG, Travesi-Raygoza AG. Estrés universitario en estudiantes de medicina de la Universidad de Quintana Roo. Rev Sal Quintana Roo [Internet]. 2020;12(41):13–17. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=92413
Brito-Ortíz JF, Nava-Gómez ME, Juárez-García A. Escala de estrés percibido en estudiantes de odontología, enfermería y psicología: validez de constructo. RCCEPG [Internet]. 2019;4(2):42–54. https://doi.org/10.32654/CONCIENCIAEPG.4-2.4
Alwaqdani N, Amer HA, Alwaqdani R, AlMansour F, Alzoman HA, Saadallah A, et al. Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Perceived Stress Scale Measures. J Epidemiol Glob Health [Internet]. 2021;11(4):377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-021-00014-4
Ruiz‐Fernández MD, Ramos‐Pichardo JD, Ibáñez‐Masero O, Cabrera‐Troya J, Carmona‐Rega MI, Ortega‐Galán ÁM. Compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress in healthcare professionals during the COVID‐19 health crisis in Spain. J Clin Nurs [Internet]. 2020;29(21–22):4321–4330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15469
Reyna C, Mola DJ, Correa PS. Escala de Estrés Percibido: análisis psicométrico desde la TCT y la TRI. Ansiedad y Estrés [Internet]. 2019;25(2):138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2019.04.003
Dominguez-Lara S, Merino-Soto C, Torres-Villalobos G. Structural analysis and reliability of the Perceived Stress Scale in nursing professionals from Peru. Enf Clin (Engl Ed) [Internet]. 2022;32(3):152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.01.001
Andreou E, Alexopoulos EC, Lionis C, Varvogli L, Gnardellis C, Chrousos GP, et al. Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2011;8(8):3287–3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083287
Puentes ML, Díaz RAB. Reliability and construct validity of the Perceived Stress Scale in medical students. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2019;23(3):373–379. Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=89732
Moral de la Rubia J, Cázares de León F. Validación de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (PSS-14) en la población de dentistas colegiados de Monterrey. Ansiedad y estrés [Internet]. 2014;20(2-3);193–209. Disponible en: https://www.ansiedadyestres.es/sites/default/files/rev/ucm/2014/anyes2014a14.pdf
Zhu G, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Li J, Guan P, Liu Y, et al. Development and Validation of the Perceived Stress Scale in Emergency Medical Teams During the Epidemic of COVID-19. Res Sq [Internet]. 2021:1–18. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665920/v1
Chen JY, Chin WY, Tiwari A, Wong J, Wong ICK, Worsley A, et al. Validation of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10) in medical and health sciences students in Hong Kong. Asian Pac Sch [Internet]. 2021;6(2):31–37. https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-2/OA2328
Erdoğan T, Bayraktar Y, Uçan F, Atilgan SS. The effect of perceived stress on organizational silence in emergency service doctors in Turkey: The mediating role of emotional intelligence. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2022;10:101082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010827
Ráczová B, Hricová M, Lovašová S. Verification of psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the PSS-10 survey (Perceived Stress Scale) on a sample of assisting professionals. Cesk Psychol [Internet]. 2018;62(6):552–564. Available from: https://bit.ly/46aS2cK
Sandhu SS, Ismail NH, Rampal KG. The malay version of the perceived stress scale (PSS)-10 is a reliable and valid measure for stress among nurses in Malaysia. Malay J Med Sci [Internet]. 2015;22(6):26–31. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28223882/
Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC, Herazo E. Escala de Estrés Percibido-10: Desempeño psicométrico en estudiantes de medicina de Bucaramanga, Colombia. Rev Fac Med [Internet]. 2014;62(3):407–413. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v62n3.43735
Jorquera-Gutiérrez R, Guerra-Diaz F. Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (PSS-14 y PSS-10) en un grupo de docentes de Copiapó, Chile. Liberabit [Internet]. 2023;29(1):e683. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2023.v29n1.683
Carvajal CC, Gómez N, López F, Otárola N, Briceño M. Estructura factorial de la escala de estrés percibido (PSS) en una muestra de trabajadores chilenos. Salud & Sociedad [Internet]. 2017;8(3):218–226. Disponible en: https://revistas.ucn.cl/index.php/saludysociedad/article/view/2649
Pedrero-Pérez EJ, de León JMRS, Lozoya-Delgado P, Rojo-Mota G, Llanero-Luque M, Puerta-García C. La "Escala de estrés percibido": estudio psicométrico sin restricciones en población no clínica y adictos a sustancias en tratamiento. Psicol Conductual [Internet]. 2015;23(2):305–324. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-151099
Ticahuanca-Murillo N, Chura-Quispe G. La Validación de la Escala de estrés percibido por COVID-19 en estudiantes universitarios peruanos: Validación de la Escala de estrés percibido por COVID-19. Psychol Av Discip [Internet]. 2022;16(2):13–26. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.5833
Juárez-García A, Merino-Soto C, Brito-Ortiz JF, Nava-Gómez ME, Monroy-Castillo A. Is it the perceived stress scale (PSS) Undimimensional and invariant? A Bifactor analysis in Mexican adults. Curr Psychol [Internet]. 2021;42:7252–7266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02067-x
Golino HF, Shi D, Christensen AP, Garrido LE, Nieto MD, Sadana R, et al. Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychol Methods [Internet]. 2020;25(3):292–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255
Golino HF, Epskamp S. Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2017;12(6):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174035
Christensen AP, Golino H. Estimating the Stability of Psychological Dimensions via Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Tutorial. Psych [Internet]. 2021;3(3):479–500. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032
Golino HF, Christensen AP. EGAnet: Exploratory graph analysis: A framework for estimating the nunber of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=EGAnet
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling [Internet]. 1999;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Green SB, Yang Y. Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha. Psychometrika [Internet]. 2009;74(1):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9099-3
Pérez E, Medrano L. Análisis Factorial Exploratorio: Bases Conceptuales y Metodológicas. Rev Arg Cienc Comportamiento [Internet]. 2010;2(1):58–66. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3161108
Christensen AP, Golino H. On the equivalency of factor and network loadings. Behav Res Methods [Internet]. 2021;53(4):1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01500-6
Beauducel A, Herzberg PY. On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA. Struct Equ Modeling [Internet]. 2006;13(2):186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
Katz M. Multivariable Analysis. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974175
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iatreia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Papers published in the journal are available for use under the Creative Commons license, specifically Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
The papers must be unpublished and sent exclusively to the Journal Iatreia; the author uploading the contribution is required to submit two fully completed formats: article submission and authorship responsibility.




