The delay of consequences and perceived risk: an analysis from the workers’ view point

Authors

  • Ignacio Rodríguez-Garzón Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
  • Antonio Delgado-Padial Universidad de Granada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-0506
  • Myriam Martinez-Fiestas Universidad ESAN
  • Valeriano Lucas-Ruiz Universidad de Sevilla

Keywords:

perceived risk, occupational hygiene, ergonomics, prevention.

Abstract


This  paper  addresses  the  question  of  how  construction  workers  perceive   occupational risks. It is a question that has not been addressed in scientific  research.  Specifically,  we  answer  the  following  research  questions:  what  is  the  perception  of  risk  of  construction  workers?;  what  aspects  of  risk   significantly influence the formation of the overall perception of risk?; are  there  sociodemographic  variables  that  help  to  understand  the  perception  of   risk of construction workers? and if this were the case, then what are these  variables and how do they influence them?. Ultimately, it examines the profile  of perceived risk, its relation to the delay of consequences and the influence  of socio-demographic variables.  Respondents filled out a questionnaire in the presence of the survey-taker. The  questionnaire was based on the psychometric paradigm, and was comprised  of: (a) nine questions, each exploring a perceived risk attribute or dimension  rated on a Likert 7-point scale, (b) a question on global risk perception, and (c)  categorical  questions  about  socio-demographic  issues.  The  survey  was   conducted in the city of Granada (Spain). A profile of the construction workers’ perceived risk was obtained. Answers  to each attribute were above the neutral line (scores above four). The profile  shows the risk dimension with the highest score was the delayed consequences  of exposure to risk conditions, a dimension that can be related to ergonomics  and  occupational  hygiene.  This  is  a  new  outcome  since  traditionally  this   dimension was given a 

|Abstract
= 24 veces | PDF
= 19 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ignacio Rodríguez-Garzón, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas

Departamento de Ingeniería Civil

Antonio Delgado-Padial, Universidad de Granada

Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Ciencias del Trabajo

Profesor Titular de Escuela Universitaria.

Myriam Martinez-Fiestas, Universidad ESAN

profesora investigadora a tiempo completo, Departamento de Marketing

Valeriano Lucas-Ruiz, Universidad de Sevilla

Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas, Profesor titular

References

S. Ghosh, J. Jintanapakanont. “Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach”. Int. J. Project Manage. Vol. 22. 2004. pp. 633-643.

J. Choi, J. Chung, D. Lee. “Risk perception analysis: Participation in China’s water PPP market”. Int. J. Project Manage. Vol. 28. 2010. pp. 580-592.

I. Fung, T. Lo, K. Tung. “Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: Development of a qualitative & quantitative risk evaluation model (Q(2)REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong”. Accid. Anal. Prev. Vol. 48. 2012. pp. 167-184.

B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein. “Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk”. Am Stat. Vol. 36. 1982. pp. 240-255.

W. Freudenburg. “Risky thinking: Irrational fears about risk and society”. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. Vol. 545. 1996. pp. 44-53.

W. Fine. Mathematical evaluations for controlling hazards. Naval Ordenance Laboratory N.° NOLTR-71-31. Maryland, USA. 1971. pp. 1-28.

P. Slovic. “Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm”. S. Krimsky, D. Golding (editors). Social Theories of Risk. 1st ed. Ed. Praeger. Santa Barbara, USA. 1992. pp. 117-152.

A. Akintoye, M. MacLeod. “Risk analysis and management in construction”. Int. J. Project Manage. Vol. 15. 1997. pp. 31-38.

International Organization for Standardization. Risk management—vocabulary—guidelines for use in standards. ISO/IEC Guide No. 73. Geneva, Switzerland. 2002.

H. Hermansson. “Defending the Conception of ‘Objective Risk’”. Risk Anal. Vol. 32. 2012. pp. 16-24.

T. Aven, V. Kristensen. “Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach”. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. Vol. 90. 2005. pp. 1-14.

C. Vlek, O. Keren. Behavioral Decision Theory and Environmental Risk management: What Have We Learned and what Has Been Neglected? Proceedings of the l3th Research Conference on Subjetive Probability, Utility and Decision Making. Fribourg, Switzerland. 1991.

M. Hallowell. “Safety risk perception in construction companies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA”. Constr. Manage. Econ. Vol. 28. 2010. pp. 403-413.

S. Kaplan, B. Garrick. “On the quantitative definition of risk”. Risk Anal. Vol. 1. 1981. pp. 11-27.

L. Sjöberg. “Factors in risk perception”. Risk Anal. Vol. 20. 2000. pp. 1-12.

B. Rohrmann, O. Renn. “Risk perception research: An introduction”. B. Rohrmann, O. Renn (editors). Crosscultural risk perception. 1st ed. Ed. Kluwer. Dordrecht, Netherlands. 2000. pp. 11-53.

R. Lion, R. Meertens, I. Bot. “Priorities in information desire about unknown risks”. Psych Sci. Vol. 22. 2002. pp. 765-776.

A. Stewart, J. Cherrie. “Does risk perception affect behaviour and exposure? A pilot study amongst asbestos workers”. Ann. Occup. Hyg. Vol. 42. 1998. pp. 565-569.

N. Weinstein. “Unrealistic optimism about future life events”. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Vol. 39. 1980. pp. 806.

E. Vaughan. “Chronic exposure to an environmental hazard: risk perceptions and self-protective behavior”. Health Psychol. Vol. 12. 1993. pp. 74.

N. Brewer, N. Weinstein, C. Cuite, J. Herrington. “Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior”. Ann Behav Med. Vol. 27. 2004. pp. 125-130.

S. Mohamed, T. Ali, W. Tam. “National culture and safe work behaviour of construction workers in Pakistan”. Saf. Sci. Vol. 47. 2009. pp. 29-35.

W. Harrell. “Perceived risk of occupational injury: Control over pace of work and blue-collar versus white-collar work”. Percept. Mot. Skills. Vol. 70. 1990. pp. 1351-1359.

S. Cox, T. Cox. “The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example”. Work & Stress. Vol. 5. 1991. pp. 93-106.

T. Rundmo. “Associations between risk perception and safety”. Saf. Sci. Vol. 24. 1996. pp. 197-209.

A. Oliver, A. Cheyne, J. Tomás, S. Cox. “The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents”. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Vol. 75. 2002. pp. 473-488.

J. Mullen. “Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work”. J. Saf. Res. Vol. 35. 2004. pp. 275-285.

D. Seo. “An explicative model of unsafe work behavior”. Saf. Sci. Vol. 43. 2005. pp. 187-211.

P. Arezes, M. Bizarro. “Alcohol Consumption and Risk Perception in the Portuguese Construction Industry”. The Open Occupational Health & Safety Journal. Vol. 3. 2011. pp. 10-17.

R. Choudhry, D. Fang. “Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites”. Saf. Sci. Vol. 46. 2008. pp. 566- 584.

A. Starren, J. Hornikx, K. Luijters. “Occupational safety in multicultural teams and organizations: A research agenda”. Saf. Sci. Vol. 52. 2013. pp. 43-49.

K. Mearns, R. Flin, R. Gordon, M. Fleming. “Measuring safety climate on offshore installations”. Work Stress. Vol. 12. 1998. pp. 238-254.

R. Fortner, J. Lee, J. Corney, S. Romanello, J. Bonnell, B. Luthy, C. Figuerido, N. Ntsiko. “Public understanding of climate change: certainty and willingness to act”. Environmental Education Research. Vol. 6. 2000. pp. 127-141.

A. Kirschenbaum, L. Oigenblick, A. Goldberg. “Well being, work environment and work accidents”. Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 50. 2000. pp. 631-639.

P. Gucer, M. Oliver, M. McDiarmid. “Workplace threats to health and job turnover among women workers”. J Occup Env Med. Vol. 45. 2003. pp. 683- 690.

S. J. Linton, K. Halldén. “Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain”. Clin. J. Pain. Vol. 14. 1998. pp. 209-215.

S. Yeung, A. Genaidy, J. Deddens, A. Alhemood, P. Leung. “Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in single and multiple body regions and effects of perceived risk of injury among manual handling workers”. Spine. Vol. 27. 2002. pp. 2166-2172.

D. Hermand, E. Mullet, L. Rompteaux. “Societal risk perception among children, adolescents, adults, and elderly people”. J Adult Dev. Vol. 6. 1999. pp. 137- 143.

C. Palmer. “Risk perception: Another look at the’white male’effect”. Health Risk Soc. Vol. 5. 2003. pp. 71-83.

T. O’Connor, D. Loomis, C. Runyan, J. Santo, M. Schulman. “Adequacy of health and safety training among young Latino construction workers”. J Occup Env Med. Vol. 47. 2005. pp. 272-277.

M. Camino, D. Ritzel, I. Fontaneda, O. Gonzalez. “Construction industry accidents in Spain”. J. Saf. Res. Vol. 39. 2008. pp. 497-507.

E. Vaughan, B. Nordenstam. “The perception of environmental risks among ethnically diverse groups”. J Cross-Cult Psychol. Vol. 22. 1991. pp. 29-60.

T. Blocker, D. Eckberg. “Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey”. Soc Sci Quart. Vol. 78. 1997. pp. 841-858.

B. Williams, Y. Florez. “Do Mexican Americans perceive environmental issues differently than Caucasians: a study of cross-ethnic variation in perceptions related to water in Tucson”. Environ. Health Perspect. Vol. 110. 2002. pp. 303.

J. Lerner, R. Gonzalez, D. Small, B. Fischhoff. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism A National Field Experiment”. Psych Sci. Vol. 14. 2003. pp. 144-150.

A. Tversky, D. Kahneman. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases”. Science. Vol. 185. 1974. pp. 1124-1131.

B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, B. Combs. “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits”. Policy Sci. Vol. 9. 1978. pp. 127-152.

M. Douglas, A. Wildavsky. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. 1st ed. Ed. University of California Press. Berkeley, USA. 1982. pp. 1-284.

P. Slovic. “Perception of risk”. Science. Vol. 236. 1987. pp. 280-285.

M. Viklund. “Trust and risk perception in western Europe: A cross‐national study”. Risk Anal. Vol. 23. 2003. pp. 727-738.

M. Portell, M. Solé. Riesgo percibido: un procedimiento de evaluación. NTP 578. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT). Madrid, Spain. 2001.

M. Hallowell. A Formal Model for Construction Safety and Health Risk Management. Doctoral Thesis. Oregon State University. Corvallis, USA. 2008. pp. 1-318.

J. Bohm, D. Harris. “Risk perception and risk-taking behavior of construction site dumper drivers”. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergonomics. Vol. 16. 2010. pp. 55-67.

D. Knowles. Risk perception leading to risk taking behaviour amongst farmers in England and Wales. 1st ed. Ed. HSE Books. Wolverhampton, UK. 2002. pp. 1-149.

N. Holmes, H. Lingard, Z. Yesilyurt, F. Munk. “An exploratory study of meanings of risk control for long term and acute effect occupational health and safety risks in small business construction firms”. J. Saf. Res. Vol. 30. 1999. pp. 251-261.

D. Litai, D. Lanning, N. Rasmussen. “The public perception of risk”. V. Covello, W. Flamm, J. Rodricks, R. Tardiff (editors). The analysis of actual versus perceived risks. 1st ed. Ed. Springer. New York, USA. 1983. pp. 213-224.

M. Björkman. “Decision making, risk taking and psychological time: Review of empirical findings and psychological theory”. Scand. J. Psychol. Vol. 25. 1984. pp. 31-49.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-19

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Delgado-Padial, A., Martinez-Fiestas, M., & Lucas-Ruiz, V. (2015). The delay of consequences and perceived risk: an analysis from the workers’ view point. Revista Facultad De Ingeniería Universidad De Antioquia, (74), 165–176. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/19758