Heuristic parameter estimation for a continuous fermentation bioprocess

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n88a04

Keywords:

Heuristic algorithms, Local search methods, Bacterial chemotaxis, Continuous time system estimation, Zymomonas mobilis

Abstract


Zymomonas mobilis continuous fermentation bioprocess has the ability of producing energy from glucose catabolism, which promises a relevant application for biomass conversion into fuel, and therefore it represents an industrial scale production alternative for our country. However, it has demonstrated high complexity regarding the non-linear and non-Gaussian characteristics of its dynamics. Several works have been dealing not only with the bioprocess modeling but also with controller design and implementation. These works have developed state and parameter estimation strategies based on particle filters and Gaussian methods, as well as closing the loop with nonlinear controllers. Nevertheless, there is a need to improve previous parameter estimation results, enabling future design of control strategies for industrial applications. We present a set of heuristics algorithms for the non-linear system parameter estimation evaluated with data from 150 hours of fermentation. Some algorithms such as local search methods, simulated annealing, population heuristics, differential evolution, bacterial chemotaxis and other techniques were tested for the bioprocess. Simulations of the microorganism model and experimental verifications showed the good performance in parameter accuracy and convergence speed of some of the heuristic methods proposed here. Moreover, the reliability and acceptable computational costs of these methods demonstrate that they could also be applied as parameter estimators for other bioprocesses of a similar complexity.

|Abstract
= 119 veces | PDF
= 136 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nicolás Prieto-Escobar, EAFIT University

Department of Mathematical Sciences.  

Pablo Andrés Saldarriaga-Aristizabal, EAFIT University

Department of Mathematical Sciences.

Valentina Chaparro-Muñoz, EAFIT University

Department of Mathematical Sciences.

References

A. Alireza, “Pso with adaptive mutation and inertia weight and its application in parameter estimation of dynamic systems,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 541–549, May 2011.

A. C. R. Camêlo, J. C. Pinto, and I. O. Pinheiro, “Parameter estimation of continuous fermentations using particle swarm,” in 2/textsuperscriptnd Mercosur Congress on Chemical Engineering 4/textsuperscriptth Mercosur Congress on Process Systems Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2005, pp. 1–10.

C. G. Moles, P. Mendes, and J. R. Banga, “Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods,” Genome research, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2467–2474, Oct 2003.

M. Rodriguez, J. A. Egea, and J. R. Banga, “Novel metaheuristic for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic biological systems,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 483, Nov 2006.

A. Amicarelli, L. Quintero, and F. Sciascio, “Substrate feeding strategy integrated with a biomass bayesian estimator for a biotechnological process,” nternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1187–1200, Abr 2016.

O. L. Quintero, A. A. Amicarelli, F. di Sciascio, and G. Scaglia, “State estimation in alcoholic continuous fermentation of zymomonas mobilis using recursive bayesian filtering: A simulation approach,” Bioresources, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 316–334„ 2008.

M. X. et al, “Zymomonas mobilis: a novel platform for future biorefineries,” Biotechnology for biofuels, vol. 7, no. 101, Jul 2014.

L. R. Lynd, “Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: Technology, economics, the environment, and policy.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 403–465, Nov 1996.

O. L. Quintero, J. D. Nieto, A. A. Amicarelli, G. Scaglia, T. Luna, and F. di Sciascio, “Control engineering perspective of fermentation process from zymomonas mobilis : Modeling , state estimation and control,” 2008.

O. L. Q. Montoya, G. Scaglia, F. di Sciascio, and V. Mut, “Numerical methods based strategy and particle filter state estimation for bio process control,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, April 2008, pp. 1–6.

J. Wei and Y. Yu, “An effective hybrid cuckoo search algorithm for unknown parameters and time delays estimation of chaotic systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 6560–6571, 2018.

J. Baxter., “Local optima avoidance in depot location,” The Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 815–819, Dec 1981.

J. Holland., Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence, 1st ed. University of Michigan Press, 1975.

N. Mladenović and P. Hansen, “Variable neighborhood search,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1097–1100, Nov 1997.

R. C. White, “A survey of random methods for parameter optimization,” SIMULATION, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 197–205, 1971.

S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, vol. 220, no. 4598, pp. 671–680, 1983.

S. Kitayama, M. Arakawa, and K. Yamazaki, “Discrete differential evolution for mixed discrete non-linear problems.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 594–605, May 2012.

H. Bremermann, “Chemotaxis and optimization,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 279, no. 5, pp. 397–404, May 1974.

S. D. Muller, J. Marchetto, S. Airaghi, and P. Kournoutsakos, “Optimization based on bacterial chemotaxis,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–29, Feb 2002.

H. Alvarez, O. Quintero, A. Angel, and M. Yepes, “Strategies for avoiding local extreme in function optimization through bacterial chemotaxis,” 08 2018.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-18

How to Cite

Prieto-Escobar, N., Saldarriaga-Aristizabal, P. A., & Chaparro-Muñoz, V. (2018). Heuristic parameter estimation for a continuous fermentation bioprocess. Revista Facultad De Ingeniería Universidad De Antioquia, (88), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n88a04