An overview of asphalt pavement design for streets and roads

Keywords: Asphalt pavement, Pavement design, Perpetual pavement, Incremental design, MEPDG


Pavements constitute a geotechnical problem since they are built on the ground and with materials obtained from it: untreated, such as soils and rocks, and processed as hydraulic and bituminous binders; consequently, a geotechnical framework is useful to describe their constitutive elements. The design of asphalt pavements for streets and roads evolved from empiric to mechanistic-empiric (M-E) procedures throughout the 20th century. The mechanistic-empiric method, based on layered elastic theory, became a common practice with the publication of separate procedures by Shell Oil, Asphalt Institute, and French LCPC, among others. Since its origin, the M-E procedure can consider incremental pavement design but, only until the beginning of the 21st century, the computational power became available to practicing engineers. American MEPDG represents the state-of-the-art M-E incremental design procedure with significant advantages and drawbacks, the latter mainly related to the extensive calibration activities required to assure a proper analysis and design according to subgrade, climate, and materials at a particular location and for an intended level of reliability. Perpetual pavements are a subset of M-E designed pavements with a proven history of success for the conditions where they are warranted. No design method, either the most straightforward empirical approach or the most elaborated incremental mechanistic one, is appropriate without proper knowledge about the fundamental design factors and calibration of the performance models for each distress mode upon consideration.

= 403 veces | PDF
= 339 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luis Ricardo Vásquez-Varela, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Docente e investigador

Francisco Javier García-Orozco, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Docente investigador


A. Das, “Structural design of asphalt pavements: Principles and practices in various design guidelines,” Transportation in Developing Economies, vol. 1, July 21 2015. [Online]. Available:

Z. Wu, G. Flintsch, A. Ferreira, and L. de Picado, “Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 138, no. 12, May 29 2012. [Online]. Available:

E. J. Yoder and M. W. Witczak, Principles of Pavement Design, 2nd ed. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1975.

N. C. Yang, Design of Functional Pavements. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

Y. H. Huang, Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.

R. B. Mallick and T. El-Korchi, Pavement Engineering: Principles and Practice, 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

C. R. Gonzales, W. R. Barker, and A. Bianchini, “Reformulation of the CBR procedure report i: Basic report,” U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Missouri, Tech. Rep. ERDC/GSL TR-12-16, Apr. 2012.

G. W. Jameson, “Origins of AUSTROADS design procedures for granular pavements,” ARRB Transport Research Ltd, Vermont South, Australia, Tech. Rep. ARR 292, Sep. 1996.

Pavement Design - A Guide to the Structural Design of Road Pavements, Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 1992.

Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTO, Washington D.C., USA, 1993.

L. H. Nguyen, “Research on the correlation between international roughness index (IRI) and present serviceability index (PSI), recommendations on evaluation rates in Vietnam’s conditions,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 266–271, Sep. 2017.

B. Al-Omari and M. Darter, “Relationships between international roughness index and present serviceability rating,” Transportation Research Record 1435, pp. 130–136, 1994.

D. M. Burmister, “The theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems and application to design of airport runways,” in Proceeding HRB, Washington D.C., USA, 1943, pp. 126–148.

C. L. Monismith, “Evolution of long-lasting asphalt pavement design. distinguished lecture international society for asphalt pavements,” in International Symposium on Design and Construction of Long Lasting Asphalt Pavements, Auburn, Alabama, 2004.

M. E. Harr and C. W. Lovell, “Vertical stresses under certain axisymmetrical loadings,” Highway Research Record, vol. 39, pp. 68–81, 1963.

W. Kai, “Analysis and calculation of stresses and displacements in layered elastic systems,” Acta Mechanica Sinica, vol. 3, pp. 251–260, Aug. 1987.

J. W. Maina, Y. Ozawa, and K. Matsui, “Linear elastic analysis of pavement structure under non-circular loading,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 13, no. 3, August 01 2012. [Online]. Available:

A. Loulizi, I. L. Al-Qadi, and M. A. Elseifi, “Difference between in situ flexible pavement measured and calculated stresses and strains,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 132, no. 7, July 2006. [Online]. Available: 132:7(574)

A. T. Papagiannakis and E. A. Masad, Pavement Design and Materials, 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008.

R. B. Freeman and M. E. Harr, “Stress predictions for flexible pavement systems,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 130, no. 4, June 15 2004. [Online]. Available:

A. R. Ghanizedeh and M. R. Ahadi, “Application of artificial neural networks for analysis of flexible pavements under standard axle loading,” International Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–43, Jul. 2015.

A. R. Ghanizadeh, “Application of support vector machine regression for predicting critical responses of flexible pavements,” International Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 305–315, Mar. 2017.

Y. H. Cho, B. F. McCullough, and J. Weismann, “Considerations on finite-element method application in pavement structural analysis,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1539, no. 1, January 01 1996. [Online]. Available:

M. Y. Shahin, Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots, 2nd ed. USA: Springer, 2006.

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP, Washington D.C., USA, 2004.

Overseas Road Note 19 A guide to the design of hot mix asphalt in tropical and sub-tropical countries, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 2002.

Shell Pavement Design Software for Windows, Shell International Petroleum Company, London, 2000.

J. F. Corté and M. T. Goux, “Design of pavements structures: The french technical guide,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1539, no. 1, January 01 1996. [Online]. Available:

Conception et dimensionnement des structures de chaussée, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris, France, 1994.

P. Pereira and J. Pais, “Main flexible pavement and mix design methods in europe and challenges for the development of an european method,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, August 2017. [Online]. Available:

T. Ingason and et al., “Amadeus - advanced models for analytical design of european pavement structures,” Tech. Rep. RO-97-SC.2137, Jan. 2000.

C. W. Schwartz and R. L. Carvalho, “Implementation of the NCHRP 1-37A design guide,” University of Maryland, Maryland, USA, Tech. Rep., 2007.

AASHTO, Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice. Washington D.C., USA: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2008.

L. M. Pierce and G. McGovern, “Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide and software,” Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., USA, Tech. Rep. NCHRP Synthesis 457, 2014.

N. Tran, M. M. Robbins, C. Rodezno, and D. H. Timm, “Pavement ME design - impact of local calibration, foundation support, and design and reliability thresholds,” National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Alabama, Tech. Rep. NCAT Report 17-08, Sep. 2017.

C. W. Schwartz, S. H. Kim, H. Ceylan, K. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Li, “Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction,” Iowa State University, Maryland, USA, Tech. Rep. NCHRP Project 1-47, 2011.

T. Kasperick and K. Ksabaiti, “Calibration of the mechanisticempirical pavement design guide for local paved roads in Wyoming,” The Mountain Plains Consortium, Laramie, Wyoming, Tech. Rep. MPC 15-294, Dec. 2015.

Y. R. Kim, F. M. Jadoun, T. Hou, and N. Muthadi, “Local calibration of the MEPDG for flexible pavement design,” North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC, Tech. Rep. FHWA-NC-2007-07, Oct. 2011.

R. Velasquez and et al., “Implementation of the MEPDG for new and rehabilitated pavement structures for design of concrete and asphalt pavements in minnesota,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, Tech. Rep. MnDOT 2009-06, 2009.

R. L. Baus and N. R. Stires, “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide implementation,” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - The University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, Tech. Rep. FHWA-SC-10-01, Jun. 2010.

R. C. Williams and R. Shaidur, “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide calibration for pavement rehabilitation,” Oregon Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration, Salem, Oregon, Tech. Rep. SPR 718, 2013.

Q. Li, D. X. Xiao, K. C. P. Wang, K. D. Hall, and Y. Qiu, “Mechanisticempirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): A bird’s-eye view,” Journal of Modern Transportation, vol. 19, no. 2, June 2013. [Online]. Available:

P. Ullidtz and et al., “CalME, a mechanistic-empirical program to analyze and design flexible pavement rehabilitation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2153, November 2010. [Online]. Available:

(2019) Calme version 3 help file. University of California Pavement Research Center UCPRC. Accessed Jan. 31, 2020. [Online]. Available:

S. Hu, F. Zhou, and T. Scullion, “Texas M-E flexible pavement design system: Literature review and proposed framework,” Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, Texas, Tech. Rep. FHWA-TX-12-0-6622-1, Apr. 2012.

D. H. Timm, M. M. Robbins, N. Tran, and C. Rodezno, “Flexible pavement design - state of the practice,” National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, Tech. Rep. NCAT Report 1404, Aug. 2014.

D. E. Newcomb, M. Buncher, and I. J. Huddleston, “Concepts of perpetual pavements,” Transportation Research Board, vol. 503, pp. 4– 11, 2001.

A. Institute, Thickness Design: Asphalt Pavements for Highways & Streets. Lexington, Kentucky: Asphalt Institute, 1981.

R. N. Walker, W. D. O. Patterson, C. R. Freeme, and C. P. Marias, “The south african mechanistic pavement design procedure,” in 4th International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 1977.

Pavement Design - A Guide to the Structural Design of Road Pavements. Interim Version of Revised Overlay Design Procedures, Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 1994.

How to Cite
Vásquez-Varela, L. R., & García-Orozco, F. J. (2020). An overview of asphalt pavement design for streets and roads. Revista Facultad De Ingeniería Universidad De Antioquia, (98), 10-26.