Migrating from static to dynamic survivable WDM networks: the capacity-availability trade-off

Authors

  • Ariel Leiva Federico Santa María Technical University
  • Alejandra Beghelli Federico Santa María Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.12490

Keywords:

availability, dimensioning, blocking probability, WDM networks

Abstract

The benefit of migrating from fault-tolerant static WDM networks to survivable dynamic WDM networks is evaluated in terms of the trade-off between the additional network capacity (number of wavelengths) required to provide fault tolerance capability and the availability obtained by doing so.For the static WDM network case, wavelength requirements were obtained using a near-to-optimal dimensioning heuristic procedure, considering shared protection. For the dynamic WDM network case, wavelength requirements to guarantee a blocking probability threshold were evaluated using simulation-based techniques, for shared protection and restoration survivability mechanisms.Results show that, for every additional wavelength in the network, the availability gain of restored dynamic WDM networks is higher than that obtained using static or dynamic protected networks. We expect these results will help network operators in the decision making of migration processes.

|Abstract
= 98 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 41 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ariel Leiva, Federico Santa María Technical University

Department of Electronic Engineering. School of Electrical Engineering. Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso.

Alejandra Beghelli, Federico Santa María Technical University

Department of Electronic Engineering. Electronic & Electrical Engineering Department. University College London.

References

A. Sano, H. Masuda, T. Kobayashi, M. Fukiwara, K. Horikoshi, E. Yoshida, Y. Miyamoto, M. Matsui, M. Mizoguchi, Y. Yamazaki, Y. Sakamaki, H. Ishii. 69.1- Tb/s (432 x 171-Gb/s) C-and Extended L-Band Transmission over 240 km Using PDM-16-QAM Modulation and Digital Coherent Detection. In Proc. of Optical Fiber Communication Conference OFC/ NFOEC. San Diego (USA). 2010. pp. PDPB7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2010.PDPB7

S. Baroni, P. Bayvel. “Wavelength requirements in arbitrarily connected wavelength-routed optical networks”. J. Lightwave Technol. Vol. 15. 1997. pp. 242-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/50.554330

P. Yuan, A. Xu. “The influence of physical network topologies on wavelength requirements in optical networks”. J. Lightwave Technol. Vol. 28. 2010. pp. 1338-1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2010.2045153

A. Saleh, J. Simmons. “Technology and architecture to enable the explosive growth of the internet”. IEEE Commun. Mag. Vol. 49. 2011. pp. 126-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5681026

A. Zapata, S. Ahumada. Static vs. Dynamic WavelengthRouted Optical Networks under Time-Varying Traffic. In Proc. of OFC/NFOEC. San Diego (USA). 2008. pp.1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2008.4528111

A. Zapata, P. Bayvel. “Dynamic vs. static wavelengthrouted optical networks”. J. Lightwave Technol. Vol. 26. 2008. pp. 3403-3415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2008.925718

J. Zhang, B. Mukherjee. “A review of fault management in WDM mesh networks: Basic concepts and research challenges”. IEEE Network. Vol. 18. 2004. pp. 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2004.1276610

D. Schupke, R. Prinz. “Capacity Efficiency and Restorability of Path Protection and Rerouting in WDM Networks Subject to Dual Failures”. Photonic Netw. Commun. Vol. 8. 2004. pp. 191-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000033978.22198.6f

A. Leiva, J. Finochietto, B. Huiszoon, V. López, M. Tarifeño, J. Aracil, A. Beghelli. “Comparison in Power Consumption of Static and Dynamic WDM Networks”. Opt. Switch. Netw. Vol. 8. 2011. pp. 149-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2011.03.005

E. Bouillet, G. Ellinas, J. Labourdette. Path Routing in Mesh Optical Networks. Ed. John Wiley & Sons. 2007. pp. 63-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470032985

M. Düser, P. Bayvel. “Analysis of a dynamically wavelength-routed optical burst switched network architecture”. J. Lightwave Technol. Vol. 20. 2002. pp. 574-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/50.996576

N. Seitz. “ITU-T QoS standards for IP-based networks”. IEEE Commun. Mag. Vol. 41. 2003. pp. 82-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2003.1204752

A. Mokhtar, “Adaptive wavelength routing in alloptical networks”. IEEE/ACM T. on Networking. Vol. 6. 1998. pp. 197-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/90.664268

R. Vallejos, A. Zapata, M. Aravena. Fast and effective dimensioning algorithm for end-to-end optical burst switching networks with ON-OFF traffic model. In Proc. of ONDM. Athens (Greece). 2007. pp. 378-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72731-6_41

A. Zapata, A. Leiva, R. Vallejos, M. Aravena. Dynamic versus static WDM networks under single link failure conditions. Proc. of ONDM. Braunschweig (Germany). 2009. pp. 111-116.

Published

2012-08-01

How to Cite

Leiva, A., & Beghelli, A. (2012). Migrating from static to dynamic survivable WDM networks: the capacity-availability trade-off. Revista Facultad De Ingeniería Universidad De Antioquia, (63), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.12490