Estigmas y paradigmas de los encantos y encantamientos de Dulcinea

Paola Uparela Reyes

doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.21835

Stigmas and paradigms around Dulcinea’s enchantments

Authors

Paola Uparela Reyes University of Notre Dame

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.21835

Keywords:

Dulcinea, enchantment, monstrosity, Aldonza, princess

Abstract

Dulcinea is not simply the princess or Aldonza Lorenzo as critics have assumed for decades. The ambiguity between don Quixote’s ideal and the novel triggers the appearance of women as apocryphal Dulcineas. This paper analyzes the ambiguity with Aldonza, the appearance of the Enchanted Dulcinea in the begining of the Second part, the dream in Montesinos’ Cave, and the function of Dulcinea as justification of the knight errant’s actions. Yet, Dulcinea as imagined by Sancho, the Enchanted Dulcinea, as well as the wish for her disenchantment, introduce a character opposed don Quixote’s ideal: she is rustic, grotesque, abject and monstrous.

|Abstract

= 163 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 133 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arreola, J. (2005). «Teoría de Dulcinea». Cuentos de Caballeros Extraordinarios. Madrid: Páginas de Espuma.

Cervantes, M. de. (2005). Don Quijote de la Mancha. F. Rico (Ed.). San Pablo: Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española / Editorial Alfaguara.

Coleman, L. (1997). «Stigma: an Enigma Demystified.»The Disability Studies Reader.London: Routledge.

Delicado, F. (2003). La lozana Andaluza. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

Douglas, M. (1988). purity and Danger: an Analysis of the Concepts of pollution and Taboo. London: Ark Paperbacks.

Freud, S. (1950). The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Ballantyne Press.

Kayser, W. (1963). The Grotesque in Art and Literature. Bloomington: Ulrich Weisstein.

Kristeva, J. (1982). powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

Mitchell, D. & Sharon Snyder. (2000). narrative prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Quevedo, F. de. (1991). El buscón. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

Riquer, M. de. (1970). Aproximación al Quijote. Madrid: Salvat Editores.

Santiesteban, H. (2003). Tratado de monstruos: ontología teratológica. México, D.F.: Plaza y Valdés.

Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (Bio)ethics. London: Routledge.

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2015-02-11

How to Cite

Uparela Reyes, P. (2015). Stigmas and paradigms around Dulcinea’s enchantments. Lingüística Y Literatura, 36(67), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.21835

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 36 Núm. 67 (2015): ENERO-JUNIO, 2015

Section

Research articles

License

Creative Commons by-nc-sa

Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:

1. The journal is the owner of the copyright of the articles, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows third parties to share the work provided its author is indicated and its first publication in this journal.

2. The authors may adopt other agreements of non-exclusive license of distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.

3. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.