La metáfora en el siglo XX: dos maneras de interpretar el concepto

Tatiana Mukhortikova

doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.n74a07

Authors

Tatiana Mukhortikova University of Valencia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n74a07

Keywords:

metaphor, pragmatics, conceptual metaphor, formalism

Abstract

The aim of this article is to summarize, through the analysis of the main theoretical sources, the development of two ways to interpret metaphor. They might be called: 1) the formalist vision, centered on description of features of metaphor, its formal structure and its functions in a text or a discourse; and 2) the pragmatic and cognitive vision that offers an understanding of metaphor in the communicative situation showing its role as one of the basic chains of the human thought.

|Abstract

= 408 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 206 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristóteles (2009). El arte poética [e-book]. Santa Fe: El Cid Editor.

Arutyunova N.D. (1978). Funktsional’nye tipy yazykovoy metafory. Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR, 37(4), 333-343.

Arutyunova N.D. (1999). Yazyk i mir cheloveka. Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury.

Austin, J. L. (1982). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras: palabras y acciones. Barcelona: Paidós.

Avélichev, A. N. (1973). Zametki o metafore. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, 10 (1), 18-29.

Avélichev, A. N. (1974). Metafora i kontekst. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, 9 (3), 30-40.

Balashova, L. (2014a). Russkaja metaforicheskaja sistema v razvitii: XI–XXI vv. Moskva: Ruko-pisnye pamjatniki Drevnej Rusi.

Balashova, L.V. (2014b). Russkaja metafora: proshloe, nastojashhee, budushhee. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.

Bally, C. (1965). Lingüística general y lingüística francesa. Madrid: Alianza.

Black, M. (1955). Metaphor. Procedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273-294. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4544549?uid=3737952&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102399897351.

Budaev, Je.V. (2016). Kognitivnaja metafora v rakurse teorii konceptual’noj integracii. Kul’tura i tekst, 27 (4), pp. 6-13. Recuperado de: http://www.ct.uni-altai.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/4_2016budaev.pdf.

Fauconnier, G. (2003). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: University Press.

Fauconnier, G. y Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2),133-187.

Fauconnier, G. y Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Gaidukova, T.M. (2012). Cvetovaja metafora v antropocentricheskoj sfere (na materialah nemec-kogo jazyka). Vestnik Vjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp. 68-73.

Gak, V. G. (1988). Metafora: universal’noe i spetsificheskoe. En VV. AA. (Eds.) Metafora v yazyke i tekste (pp. 11-26). Moskva: Nauka.

Grady, J. et al. (2001). Blending and metaphor. En R. W. Gibbs, y G. J. Steen, (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Confer-ence: Ámsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 101-124). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grice, H. P. (1996). Logic and conversation. En A. P. Martinich (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language (pp. 156-176). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jakobson, R. (2003). The metaphoric and metonymic poles. En R. Dirven, y R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparasion and Contrast (pp. 41-47). Berlin: Mounton Gruyter.

Kalínin, A. V. (1971). Leksika russkogo yazyka. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Kӧvecses, Z. (1995). The “Container” metaphor of anger in English, Chinese, Japanese and Hungarian. En Z. Radman (Ed.), From a Metaphorical Point of View: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor (pp. 117-145). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Kӧvecses, Z. (2001). Metaphor. Does it constitute or reflect cultural models? En R. W. Gibbs, y G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth Interna-tional Cognitive Linguistics Conference: Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 167-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphor and war. The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. En M. Pütz (Ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 463-481). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporany theory of metaphor. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1995). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.

Llamas Saiz, C. (2005). Metáfora y creación léxica. Pamplona: Eunsa. 27. Rahmanova, L.I. y Suzdal’ceva, V.N. (2003). Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Richards, I. A. (1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London; New York: Oxford University Press.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. En E. Rosch y B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rozental’, D.Je. (1987). Prakticheskaja stilistika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Vysshaja shkola.

Searle, J. R. (1985). Metaphor. En A. P. Martinich (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language (pp. 416-437). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shklovski, V. B. (1983). Izbrannoe. V 2-kh tomakh. T.2. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Sklyarevskaya, G. N. (1993). Metafora v sisteme yazyka. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.

Steen, G. (2001). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. En R. W. Gibbs y G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference: Amsterdam, July 1997 (pp. 57-77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tomashevski, V. B. (2001). Teoriya literatury. Poetika. Moskva: Aspekt-Press.37. Vico, G. (2006). Ciencia nueva. Madrid: Tecnos.