Un precursor desconocido de la sintaxis estructural: H. Tiktin, por Eugenio Coseriu

Eugenio Coseriu; Jorge Mauricio Molina Mejía; Maribel Betancur Serna

doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.n79a30

Authors

Eugenio Coseriu University of Tübingen
Jorge Mauricio Molina Mejía University of Antioquia
Maribel Betancur Serna University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n79a30

Keywords:

structural syntax, syntactic representation, stemmas, immediate constituents, dependencies model

Abstract

An unpublished translation of one of the works of Eugenio Coseriu (1980) is offered. It is a historiographic chapter that seeks to scrutinize the syntactic representation schemes of sentences, called stemmas. One can thus glimpse a whole work of historical tracing that seeks to refer to the predecessors of this type of syntactic models, attributed to Tesnière (1934) and to some American structuralists such as Bloomfield, Nida and Hockett from 1940. Coseriu would then present Heimann Hariton Tiktin, a German philologist, who would have proposed in 1883 a type of representation based on a model of dependencies.

|Abstract

= 464 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 0 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 308 veces|

Downloads

Author Biographies

Jorge Mauricio Molina Mejía, University of Antioquia

PhD in Computer Science and Language Sciences from the Grenoble-Alpes University (France), Professor in the area of Computational Linguistics and General Linguistics. His fields of work have to do with the processing of natural language, Corpus Linguistics and the application of computing for the teaching and learning of foreign languages. He is currently the coordinator of the Sociolinguistic Studies Group - GES and the research hotbed Corpus Ex Machina, both attached to the Faculty of Communications and Philology of the University of Antioquia (Colombia).

Maribel Betancur Serna, University of Antioquia

Undergraduate student of the Bachelor of Literature and Spanish Language of the Faculty of Education at the University of Antioquia (Colombia). Student in training of the seedling Corpus Ex Machina at the Faculty of Communications and Philology of the University of Antioquia (Colombia). Her field of interest is descriptive linguistics, particularly focused on syntactic and morphological analyses.

References

Beckman, N. (1904). Svensk språklära för den högre undervisningen [sic]. Stockholm: A. Bonnier.

Beckman, N. (1935). Svensk språklära för den högre elementarundervisningen. Stockholm: A. Bonnier.

Billroth, J. G. F. (1832). Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen. Leipzig: Weidmann.

Billroth, J. G. F. (1834). Lateinische Schulgrammatik. Leipzig: Weidmann.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.

Collinder, M. B. (1970). Noam Chomsky und die generative Grammatik. Eine kritische Betrachtung. Uppsala: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Upsaliensis.

Fries, Ch. C. (1952). The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt/Brace.

Fry, I. (1925). A Key to Language, London: Sidgwick & Jackson.

Gleason, H. A. (1955). An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Henry Holt.

Hockett, Ch. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: The MacMillan Company.

Jespersen, O. (1937). Analytic Syntax. Copenhague: Levin & Munksgaard.

Kern, F. (1883a). Die Deutsche Satzlehre: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Grundlagen. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.

Kern, F. (1883b). Zur Methodik deutschen Unterrichts. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.

Kern, F. (1884). Grundriß der Deutschen Satzlehre. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.

Nida, E. (1946 [1949]). Morphology. The Descriptive Analysis of Words. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Nida, E. (1959 [1964]). A Synopsis of English Syntax. Oklahoma: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.

Rizescu, I. (1971). H. Tiktin, Omul şi opera. Bucarest: Editura ştiinţifică.

Sandmann, M. (1973). La contraction de simples constructions du type S-P. In Expériences et critiques. Essais de Linguistique générale et de Philologie romane (pp. 81-94). Paris : Klincksieck.

Seyffert, M. (1869). Dr. Friedrich Ellendt’s Lateinische Grammatik. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.

Tesnière, L. (1934). Comment construire une syntaxe. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg, 12(7), 219-229.

Tesnière, L. (1953). Esquisse d’une syntaxe structurale. Paris : Klincksieck.

Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris : Klincksieck.

Tiktin, H. (1891-1893). Gramatica română. Bukarest: Iaşi.

Ušakov, Smirnova & Ščeptova (1929). Učebnaja kniga po russkomu jazyku. Moscú/Leningrado: Gosizdat.

Wells, R. S. (1947). Immediate Constituents. Language, 23, 81-117.

Coseriu, E. (1980). Un précurseur méconnu de la syntaxe structurale : H. Tiktin. In Recherches de linguistique : hommage à Maurice Leroy (pp. 48-62). Bruxelles : Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

Hudson, R. (2014). Sentence-Diagramming Systems Used in the USA. https://dickhudson.com/grammar-usa/

Imrenyi, A. & Mazziotta, N. (2020). Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A Historical Survey from Antiquity to Tesniere. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Mazziotta, N. & Kahane, S. (2017). To What Extent is Immediate Constituency Analysis Dependency-Based? A Survey of Foundational Texts. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017), (pp. 116-126), Pisa, Italy, September 18-20, 2017.

Menéndez, A. G. (1990). Las representaciones: medio para visualizar la estructura de la frase. Philologia Hispalensis, 5(17), 255-263.

Osborne, T. (2019). A Dependency Grammar of English: An Introduction and Beyond. John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Sarfati, G.-E. & Paveau, M.-A. (2014). Les grandes théories de la linguistique : De la grammaire comparée à la pragmatique. Paris : Armand Colin.

Tesnière, L. (1934). Comment construire une syntaxe. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg, 12(7), 219-229.