Face bows in the production of michigan occlusal splints

Authors

  • Jesús Gámez-C. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
  • Alejandro Dib-K. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP)
  • Irene Aurora Espinosa-de S. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP)

Keywords:

Face bow, Michigan occlusal splint, Semi-adjustable articulator, Bruxism, Occlusal plane

Abstract


Introduction: Michigan occlusal splints (MOS) are frequently used for the management of patients with bruxism. The literature mentions the use of face bows for mounting models in semi-adjustable articulators, but its benefit in the production of MOS is still controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the record of number of contact points and mounting time between MOS made with and without face bows in patients diagnosed with bruxism. Methods: a total of 90 splints were made and distributed among 45 patients diagnosed with bruxism at the Oral Rehabilitation Clinic of Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). The two splints (one made with a face bow mounted model and the other one without it) were compared at the articulator and clinically. The number of obtained contact points was recorded in both splints as well as the time needed for mounting. The comparisons were made with Wilcoxon statistical test and a significance level lower than 0.05. Results: the splints with face bows showed a greater average of contact points in the mouth (11.67) compared with the ones without face bows (11.58), with no significant difference (p = 0.799). Mounting time was higher in the splints made without face bows (51 s) compared with the ones with face bows (33 s), with no significant difference (p = 0.332). Conclusion: there are no significant differences in using face bows for developing MOS in bruxism patients.

|Abstract
= 260 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 345 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Jesús Gámez-C., Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

BSc in Stomatology, DDS, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Pue-bla (BUAP), Puebla, Mexico. Intern at the Specialization in Oral Pros-thesis and Implantology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

Alejandro Dib-K., Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP)

MSc in Biological Sciences. Comprehensive Dentistry Specialist. DDS, MS. Professor at the School of Stomatology, Benemérita Univer-sidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Mexico

Irene Aurora Espinosa-de S., Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP)

Ph.D. in Biological Sciences. Maxillofacial Surgery Specialist. DDS, MS. Professor at the School of Stomatology, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Puebla, Mexico.

References

Okeson JP. Etiología e identificación de los trastornos funcionales del sistema masticatorio. En: Okeson JP, Tratamiento de oclusión y afecciones temporomandibulares 5.a ed. Michigan: Mosby: 2005; 149-180.

American Academy Of Sleep Medicine, The International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Revised: diagnostic and coding manual. Chicago Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2001.

Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, Schäfer R, HandscheL J, Franz M et al. Effects of an occlusal splint compared with cognitive-behavioral treatment on sleep bruxism activity. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115: 7-14.

Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splint, J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 491-500.

Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Diagnóstico y plan de tratamiento del bruxismo. En: Ramfjord SP, Ash MM, Oclusión. 2.a ed., México: Interamericana; 1972. p. 218-242.

Academy of Prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94(1): 10-92.

Rosenstiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J. Modelos diagnósticos y procedimientos relacionados. En: Prótesis fija contemporánea. 4.a ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2006. p. 42-81.

Roark AL, Glaros AG, O’Mahony AM. Effects of interocclusal appliances on EMG activity during parafunctional tooth contact. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 573-577.

Rodrigues-Garcia R, Faot F, Cury AA. Effect of interocclusal appliance on masticatory performance of patients with bruxism. J Craniomandibular Pract 2005; 23(4): 264-268.

Fujii T, TorisuT, Nakamura S. A change of occlusal conditions after splint therapy for bruxers with and without pain in the masticatory muscles, J Craniomandibular Pract 2005; 23(2): 113-118.

Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Sloan P, Glenny AM. Tratamiento con placa de estabilización para el síndrome de disfunción temporomandibular [Internet] [Consultado 2012 May 23] Disponible en: http://www.update-software.com

Hamada T, Kotani H, Kawazoe Y, Yamada S. Effect of occlusal splints on the EMG activity of masseter and temporal muscles in bruxism with clinical symptoms. J Oral Rehabil 1982; 9: 119-123.

Hiyama S, Ono T, IshiwataY, Kato Y, Kuroda T. First night effect of an interocclusal appliance on nocturnalmasticatory muscle activity. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 139-145.

Van der Zaag J, Lobbezoo F, Wicks DJ, Visscher CM, Hamburger HL, Naeije M. Controlled assessment of the efficacy of occlusalstabilization splints on sleep bruxism. J Orofac Pain 2005; 19(2): 151-158.

Harada T, Ichiki R, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. The effect of oral splint devices on sleep bruxism: a 6-week observation with an ambulatoryelectromyographic recording device. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 482-488.

Nacimento DFF, Patto RBC, Marchini L, Cunha VPP. Occlusal splint for sleep bruxism: an electromyographicassociated to Helkimo Index evaluation. Sleep Breath 2008; 12: 275-280.

Shodadai P, Türp J, Gerds T, Strub J. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance? Int J Prosthodont 2001; 4(6): 517-522.

Fernandes D, Luz RB, Marchini L, Prisco da Cunha VP. Double-blind study for evaluation of complete dentures made by two techniques with and without face-bow. Braz J Oral Sci 2004; 3(9): 439-445.

Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: Patient ratings of denture satisfaction from randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int 2008; 39(2): 107-116.

Cunha RE, De Lacerda PE, Navas A, Lucchesi M, Miranda ME. Assessment of three mounting techniques on a semi-adjustable articulator for fabricating occlusal appliances. Int J Clin Dent 2011; 4(4): 309-319.

Pergamalian A, Rudy T, Zaki H, Greco C. The association between wear facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90(2): 194-200.

Dworkin S, LeResche L. Research Diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders; review criteria, examination and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992; 6: 301-355.

Bamber MA, Firouza RL, Harris, MA, Lhmey. A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25: 339-343.

Adrien P, Schouver J. Methods for minimizing the errors in mandibular model mounting on an articulator. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 929-935.

Gateno J, Forrest K, Camp B. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 635-640.

Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Galindo D. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82(2): 237-241.

Published

2014-01-14

How to Cite

Gámez-C., J., Dib-K., A., & Espinosa-de S., I. A. (2014). Face bows in the production of michigan occlusal splints. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 25(1), 117–131. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/14474

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.