Comparison of the shear bond strength of ceramic coating and zirconia surface with and without modifications

Authors

  • Rodrigo Felipe Naranjo-Restrepo Universidad de Antioquia
  • Luis Efrén Castro-Espitia Universidad de Antioquia
  • Francisco Levi Duque-Serna Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n2a2

Keywords:

Ceramics, Zirconium, Shear strength, Delamination

Abstract


Introduction: the use of titanium miniplates is the gold standard in the treatment of facial fractures. A Colombian company has developed a system of osteosynthesis miniplates for the treatment of facial fractures, which was chemically and mechanically compared with an imported system. Methods: comparative in-vitro tests were carried out to analyze the chemical composition and the biomechanical behavior of the national and imported systems. A sample of 36 items was selected, including 24 miniplates and 12 screws, in order to mechanically assess their materials by means of tensile and flexural tests for the plates and torque strength tests for the screws, and to perform a microscopic analysis of the chemical composition of the plates of both brands by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS). Results: The findings showed that there are no major differences in terms of the chemical composition and the biomechanical behavior of the implants of both brands (national and imported) when assessing plates and screws separately. Conclusions: the results showed a higher content of titanium in the material of national plates; however, the mechanical properties of both brands are very similar. Taking into account the material’s
biomechanical characteristics, either system is a good choice when selecting a device for rigid internal fixation of facial fractures.

|Abstract
= 63 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 86 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rodrigo Felipe Naranjo-Restrepo, Universidad de Antioquia

DMD. Specialist in Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Professor of undergraduate and graduates studies, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia . Medellín, Colombia

Luis Efrén Castro-Espitia, Universidad de Antioquia

DMD. Intern of the Graduate Program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia.

Francisco Levi Duque-Serna, Universidad de Antioquia

DMD. Specialist in Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Professor of undergraduate and graduates studies, Member of the PODCAD Research Group, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia

References

Goodisson D, MacFarlane M, Snape L, Darwish B. Head injury and associated maxillofacial injuries. N Z Med J 2004; 117: 1-5.

Zargar M, Khaji A, Karbakhsh M, Zarei MR. Epidemiology study of facial injuries during a 13 month of trauma registry in Tehran. Indian J Med Sci 2004; 58: 109-114.

Schiltz F, Frérebeau Ph, Segnarbieux F, Jebira S. Craniofacial trauma in severe head injury. Neurosurg Rev 1989; 12 Suppl 1: 106-114.

Duque FL, Martínez E, Gil FA. Epidemiología de las fracturas mandibulares atendidas en el servicio de cirugía maxilofacial y estomatología del Hospital Universitario San Vicente de Paúl en el período 1998-2005. (Medellín, Colombia). Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública 2007; 2(1): 95-110.

Ortiz G, Arango J, Giraldo C, Ramírez D, Uribe J. Análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas de pacientes intervenidos por cirugía maxilofacial en el Hospital General de Medellín. Rev CES Odontol 2007; 20: 17-21.

Das UM, Viswanath D, Subramanian V, Agarwal M. Management of dentoalveolar injuries in children: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007; 25(4): 183-186.

Hausamen JE. The scientific development of maxillofacial surgery in the 20th century and an outlook into the future. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 2-21.

Iribarren BO, Carvajal CM. Complicaciones de la fijación interna con placas de titanio de las fracturas maxilofaciales. Rev Chile Cir 2002; 54(4): 368-372.

Guyuron B, Vasconez HC. Basic principles of bone fixation. En: Ferraro JW. Fundamentals of Maxillofacial Surgery. New York: Springer; 1997. pp. 169-185.

Rahn BA. Cicatrización ósea directa e indirecta después del tratamiento quirúrgico de fractura. Clín Otorrino-laringol Norteam 1987; 3: 457-474.

Gutiérrez JL, Infante P, Fernández G, Hernández JM, González JD, Fracturas de mandíbula. En: Martínez-Villalobos S. Osteosíntesis cráneo maxilofacial. Madrid: Ergon; 2002.

Cheung LK, Chow LK, Chiu WK. A randomized controlled trial of reabsorbable versus titanium fixation for orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98(4): 386-397.

Ellis E. Rigid fixation of fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 163-173.

Booth WP, Eppley BL, Schmelzeisen R. Traumatismos maxilofaciales y reconstrucción facial estética. Madrid: Elsevier; 2005.

Martínez-Villalobos S. Controversias en Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial: Parte I: Osteosíntesis maxilofacial con titanio. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac 2004; 26(6): 351-368.

Gerlach KL, Schwarz A. Bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular angle fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31(4): 345-348.

Tate GS, Ellis E III, Throckmorton G. Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52(7): 734-736.

Cuenca-Pardo JA, Álvarez-Díaz C. Fracturas faciales complejas. Cir Plast 2004; 14(3): 132-140.

Toro-Posada A, Sanín-Arango JE, Uribe-Ríos A. Osteosíntesis con clavos flexibles intramedulares retrógrados para el manejo de las fracturas diafisiarias del fémur en niños entre 6-12 años. Iatreia 2005; 18(2): 167-176.

Alezard R, Carlos M, Nieto A, Edgar. Tratamiento de las fracturas diafisiarias del fémur mediante enclavado endomedular con dispositivo Sampedro® vs Universal Synthes®. Estudio observacional prospectivo mixto en el IAHULA. Rev Venez Cir Ortop Traumatol 2005; 37(2): 69-77.

Edwards TJ, David DJ. A comparative study of miniplates used in the treatment of mandibular fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97(6): 1150-1157.

Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B. Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxilla-facial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1973; 1(2): 79-84.

Champy M, Loddé JP, Jaeger JH, Wilk A. Ostéosynthèses mandibulaires selon la technique de Michelet: I. Bases biomechaniques. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1976; 77: 577-576.

Champy M, Loddé JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 1978; 6(1): 14-21.

Choi BH, Huh JY, Suh CH, Kim KN. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34(2): 174-177.

Hegtvedt AK, Michaels GC, Beals DW. Comparison of the resistance of miniplates and microplates to various in vitro forces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52(3): 251-257.

Loukota RA, Shelton JC. Mechanical analysis of maxillofacial miniplates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33(3): 174-179.

Righi E, Carta M, Bruzzone AA, Lonardo PM, Marinaro E, Pastorino A. Experimental analysis of internal rigid fixation osteosynthesis performed with titanium bone screw and plate systems. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996; 24(1): 53-57.

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Naranjo-Restrepo, R. F., Castro-Espitia, L. E., & Duque-Serna, F. L. (2016). Comparison of the shear bond strength of ceramic coating and zirconia surface with and without modifications. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 27(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n2a2

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>