Selection of dental ceramics in an esthetic área: a case report


  • Germán Martínez-Galeano Universidad del Valle
  • Luisa Fernanda Pacheco-Muñoz Universidad del Valle
  • Lida Constanza López-Palomar Universidad Santiago de Cali



Ceramics, Dental esthetics, Dental materials, Permanent dental restoration


The use of full ceramic systems to restore teeth in the anterior area is today the preferred method over conventional metal-ceramic systems due to the combination of aesthetic and mechanical properties, in addition to the biocompatibility of these materials and the possibility they offer to minimize tooth preparation. However, due to the sensitivity of the technique while using these systems, especially those that require adhesive cementation, it is highly important to be familiar with their characteristics and indications in order to make the right choice according to each patient’s conditions. The literature reports that the possible clinical failures of these materials are multifactorial, with occlusal instability being one of the causes. Therefore, their biomechanical behavior and the strict implementation of clinical protocols are necessary for successful long-term restorations. This article discusses the various adhesive restorative options to rehabilitate the anterior area and presents their application to a patient’s clinical case with esthetic purposes.

= 981 veces | PDF
= 716 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Germán Martínez-Galeano, Universidad del Valle

DMD, Universidad Santiago de Cali. Specialist in Oral Rehabilitation, Universidad del Valle. Professor at Universidad del Valle and Universidad Santiago de Cali.

Luisa Fernanda Pacheco-Muñoz, Universidad del Valle

DMD, Universidad del Valle. Specialist in Oral Rehabilitation, Universidad del Valle. Professor, Universidad del Valle, Colegio Odontológico Colombiano, Cali

Lida Constanza López-Palomar, Universidad Santiago de Cali

DMD, Universidad Santiago de Cali. MBA, Universidad ICES


Özcan M. Anterior restorations: direct composites, veneers or crowns? In: Roulet JF, Kappert HF (eds). Statements: diagnostics and therapy in dental medicine today and in the future. New Malden: Quintessence; 2009. p. 45-67.

Yu B, Lee YK. Comparison of the color stability of flowable and universal resin composites. Am J Dent. 2009; 22(3): 160-164.

Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Endo T, Utterodt A et al. Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28(6): 708-716.

Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 (suppl 3): 73-85.

Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55(2): 333-352. DOI:

Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(1): 4-9.

Magne P, Magne M, Belser U. The esthetic width in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 1999; 8(2): 106-118.

Odén A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(4): 450-456.

Spear FM. The metal-free practice: myth? Reality? Desirable goal? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001; 13(1): 59-67.

Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for dental applications: a review. Materials. 2010; 3(1): 351-368. DOI:

Guess PC, Strub JR, Steinhart N, Wolkewitz M, Stappert CF. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations—midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study. J Dent. 2009; 37(8): 627–637. DOI:

Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015; 31(6): 603-623. DOI:

Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(5): 389-404. DOI:

Denry I, Kelly J. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(3): 299-307. DOI:

Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2014; 27(1): 33-43. DOI:

Raigrodski AJ. All-ceramic full-coverage restorations: concepts and guidelines for material selection. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005; 17(4): 249-256.

Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139 (Suppl): 8S-13S.

Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(8): 641-652. DOI:

Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia- based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107(3): 170-177. DOI:

Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103(2): 80-90. DOI:

Wolfart S, Bohlsen F, Wegner SM, Kern M. A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2005; 18(6): 497-505.

Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prostate Dent. 2014; 112(1): 22-30. DOI:

Murgueitio R, Bernal G, Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced IPS empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21(5): 340-345. DOI:

Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26(1): 31-41.

Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44(8): 557-566. DOI:

Magne M, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior: a biomimetic approach. Chicago: Quintessence; 2003.

Raigrodski AJ, Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(6): 557-562. Doi:

Edelhoff D, Güte JF, Jungwirth F, Beuer F. Light transmission through lithium-disilicate ceramics with different levels of translucency. J Dent Res. 2010. DOI:

Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 (Suppl 3): 193-204. DOI:

Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23(6): 543-555.

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89(3): 268-274. DOI:

Marchack BW, Futatsuki Y, Marchack CB, White SN. Customization of milled zirconia copings for all-ceramic crowns: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99(3): 163-173. DOI:

Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57(4): 236-261. DOI :

Göstemeyer G, Jendras M, Dittmer MP, Bach FW, Stiesch M, Kohorst P. Influence of cooling rate on zirconia/veneer interfacial adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6(12): 4532-4538. DOI:

Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(5): 1668-1677. DOI:

Brentel AS, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Alarça LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldspathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(11): 1323-1331.

Almeida JS, Nunes Rolla J, Araujo E, Baratieri LN. All ceramic crowns and extended veneers in anterior dentition: a case report with critical discussion. Am J Esthet Dent. 2011; 1(1): 60-81.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di-Lenarda R, De-Stefano-Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(1): 90-101.

Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17(6): 536-545.




How to Cite

Martínez-Galeano, G., Pacheco-Muñoz, L. F., & López-Palomar, L. C. (2017). Selection of dental ceramics in an esthetic área: a case report. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 29(1), 222–240.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.