Physicochemical properties of two epoxy resin-based sealants: Topseal® and Adseal™. a comparative study

Authors

  • Julio César Cardona-Hidalgo Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • José Manuel González-Carreño Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Julio César Avendaño-Rueda Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v31n1-2a6

Keywords:

Root canal sealer, Flow rate, Solubility, Radiopacity, Topseal®, Ah plus®, AdSeal™

Abstract

Introduction: a new epoxy resin-based root-canal sealer (AdSeal™) recently appeared on the market. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity, flow rate, and film thickness of this sealant compared to Topseal®. Methods: the tests were conducted in compliance with ISO 6876:2012 standards. To evaluate radiopacity, 5 discs of each sealant measuring 10 mm in diameter by 1 mm thick were crafted, comparing their radiographic density in mm of aluminum (Al). For flow rate analysis, 0.05 ml of sealant were placed between 2 glass plates under a weight of 120 g for 10 minutes. The diameters of the formed discs were measured with a calibrator and analyzed with the imageJ software. For film thickness analysis, the sealants were placed between 2 glass plates, applying a load of 150N with a universal testing machine (AGIS 5KN) for 10 minutes. Distance between the glass plates was measured using a stereomicroscope at three equidistant points. Results: Topseal® showed more radiopacity (Wilcoxon p < 0.05) and less flow rate than AdSeal™, with statistically significant differences (Anova p = 0.0001863). The film thickness values are above the limit allowed by standard 6876, possibly because of the methodology used in this study; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the sealants (Anova p = 0.4927). Conclusions: the radiopacity and flow rate of AdSeal™ and Topseal® sealants comply with the ISO 6876:2012 standard, but the film thickness values fail to meet the standard.

|Abstract
= 344 veces | FIGURAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 169 veces| | HTML
= 29 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Julio César Cardona-Hidalgo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDS. Specialist in Endodontics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

José Manuel González-Carreño, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDS. Specialist in Endodontics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. MSc in Microbiology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Associate Professor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Julio César Avendaño-Rueda, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDS. Specialist in Endodontics, Universidad Santo Tomás. MSc in Endodontics, UNESP-Brazil. Assistant Professor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

References

Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. J Endod. 2006; 32(4): 281-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007

Ørstavik D. Endodontic filling materials. Endod Topics. 2014; 31(1): 53-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12068

Soares IJ, Goldberg F. Obturación del conducto radicular. En: de-Alvear MT. Endodoncia técnica y fundamentos. 2 ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2002. 141-66.

Chang SW, Lee YK, Zhu Q, Shon WJ, Lee WC, Kum KY, et al. Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers. Int J Oral Sci. 2015; 7(1): 56-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2014.33

Singh H, Markan S, Kaur M, Gupta G. Endodontic sealers: current concepts and comparative analysis. Dent Open J. 2015; 2(1): 32-7.

Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endod Topics. 2005; 12: 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00197.x

Schroeder A. The impermeability of root canal filling material and first demonstrations of new root filling materials. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1954; 64(9): 921-31.

Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, Cohen S. Obturación del sistema de conductos radiculares una vez limpios y conformados. En: Cohen. Vías de la pulpa. 11 ed. España: Elsevier; 2011. 349-88.

Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodoncia, principios y práctica. 4 ed. España: Elsevier; 2009.

Cañadas PS, Berástegui E, Gaton-Hernández P, Silva LA, Leite GA, Silva RS. Physicochemical properties and interfacial adaptation of root canal sealers. Braz Dent J. 2014; 25(5): 435-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300037

De-Almeida WA, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru-Filho M, Silva LA. Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2000; 33(1): 25-7.

Kaplan AE, Ormaechea MF, Picca M, Canzobre MC, Ubios AM. Rheological properties and biocompatibility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(8): 527-32.

Marciano MA, Guimarães BM, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, et al. Physical properties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-based sealers. J Endod. 2011; 37(10): 1417-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.023

Instituto de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). NTC 4390 Materiales para sellado de conductos radiculares. Bogotá: ICONTEC; 2014.

International Organization for Standarization (ISO). ISO 6876:2012 Dentistry root canal sealing materials. Genova: ISO; 2012.

Collins TJ. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques. 2007; 43(suppl 1): 25-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2144/000112517

Duarte MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bernardes RA, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, et al. Influence of calcium hydroxide association on the physical properties of AH Plus. J Endod. 2010; 36(6): 1048-51. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.007

Marín-Bauza GA, Silva-Sousa YT, da-Cunha SA, Rached-Junior FJ, Bonetti-Filho I, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Physicochemical properties of endodontic sealers of different bases. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20(4): 455-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000400011

Tagger M, Katz A. Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. J Endod. 2003; 29(11): 751-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200311000-00016

Tanomaru-Filho M, Jorge EG, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Gonçalves M. Radiopacity Evaluation of New Root Canal Filling Materials by Digitalization of Images. J Endod. 2007; 33(3): 249-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.015

Gümrü B, Tarçın B, Türkaydın DE, İriboz E, Öveçoğlu HS. Evaluation of the radiopacity of a mta-based root-canal filling material using digital radiography. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 2013; 3(1): 19-25.

Taşdemir T, Yesilyurt C, Yildirim T, Er K. Evaluation of the radiopacity of new root canal paste/sealers by digital radiography. J Endod. 2008; 34(11): 1388-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.008

Ehsani M, Abesi F, Haghanifar S, Khafri S, Hamzeh M, Habibi A. Comparison of radiopacity of six endodontic sealers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 2(2): 23-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.3dj.2.2.23

Grossman LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod. 1976; 2(6): 166-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(76)80059-3

Song YS, Choi Y, Lim MJ, Yu MK, Hong CU, Lee KW, et al. In vitro evaluation of a newly produced resin-based endodontic sealer. Restor Dent Endod. 2016; 41(3): 189-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.189

Downloads

Published

2019-07-09

How to Cite

Cardona-Hidalgo, J. C., González-Carreño, J. M., & Avendaño-Rueda, J. C. (2019). Physicochemical properties of two epoxy resin-based sealants: Topseal® and Adseal™. a comparative study. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 31(1-2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v31n1-2a6