Rehabilitation of the esthetic zone using multiple adjacent individual implant-supported restorations: where are the limits?

Authors

  • Guillermo Bernal-Dulcey Universidad Javeriana
  • Rafael Murgueitio Unicoc Universidad del Valle
  • Héctor Fabio Ríos Universidad de Michigan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v30n2a11

Keywords:

Dental implants, Partial edentulous, Screw retained crown

Abstract

Rehabilitation of the partially edentulous anterior maxilla is considered one of the most difficult challenges for the restorative dentist due to the esthetic, functional and psychological implications. Implant-supported restorations provide an appealing treatment alternative that responds to today’s patient expectations. The gold standard for this scenario has been the use of an implant-supported fixed partial denture with pontics that masks the soft tissue deficiencies, with acceptable esthetic results. However, nowadays patients are looking for individual single crowns since they believe that this type of restorations resemble the natural dentition, are easy to clean and floss. From the dentist perspective, they are easy to maintain and in case of prosthetic complications they can be repaired or changed without compromising the adjacent restorations. Three parameters have been identified that could guide the decision-making process when multiple adjacent implant supported restorations (MAISR) are selected as the treatment of choice: 1) Smile line 2) Inter-implant distance and tooth-implant distance 3) Patient's expectations and ability to clean.

|Abstract
= 597 veces | PDF
= 300 veces| | FIGURAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guillermo Bernal-Dulcey, Universidad Javeriana

Professor, Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia. Adjunct Professor, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California. Private Practice, Bogota, Colombia

Rafael Murgueitio, Unicoc Universidad del Valle

Professor, School of dentistry UNICOC, School of dentistry Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. Private Practice, Cali, Colombia

Héctor Fabio Ríos, Universidad de Michigan

Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

References

Kay H. Classification of altered dental esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22(1): 85-94

Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of toothsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(Suppl 3): 97-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x

Belser U, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(1): 140-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435

Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(1): 169-78

Spear F. Implants or pontics: decision making for anterior tooth replacement. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140(9): 1160-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0345

Seibert J. Lindhe J: Esthetics in periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP (eds). Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 3 ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen: Wiley-Blackwell, 1997. pp. 647-81

Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-years prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22(2): 108-17

Aghaloo T, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 49-70

Vailati F, Belser UC. Replacing four missing maxillary incisors with regular- or narrow-neck implants: analysis of treatment options. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007; 2(1): 42-57

Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(2): 121-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9

Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71(3): 283-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90468-5

Dong JK, Jin TH, Cho HW, Oh SC. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int JProsthodont. 1999; 12(1): 9-19

Passia N, Blatz M, Strub J. Is the smile line a valid parameter for esthetic evaluation? A systematic literature review. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011; 6(3): 314- 27

Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(4): 546-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546

Nevins M, Nevins M, Gobbato L, Lee HJ, Wang CW, Kim DM. Maintaining interimplant crestal bone height via a combined platform-switched, Laser-Lok implant/abutment system: a proof-of-principle canine study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33(3): 261-7. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1773

Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Mendez-Blanco V, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29(2): 141-51

Romanos GE, Javed F. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth? J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41(9): 700-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12189

Mankoo T. Maintenance of interdental papillae in the esthetic zone using multiple immediate adjacent implants to restore failing teeth—a report of ten cases at 2 to 7 years follow-up. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3(4): 304-22

Avila G, Galindo-Moreno P, Soehren S, Misch CE, Morelli T, Wang HL. A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(3): 476-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/

jop.2009.080454

Serino G, Ström C. Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(2): 169-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01627.x

Downloads

Published

2019-10-10

How to Cite

Bernal-Dulcey, G., Murgueitio, R., & Ríos, H. F. (2019). Rehabilitation of the esthetic zone using multiple adjacent individual implant-supported restorations: where are the limits?. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 30(2), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v30n2a11