Keywords: Orthodontic appliance, Cone-beam computed tomography, Temporomandibular joint condyle, Dental occlusion


Introduction: all orthodontic treatments must be safe in terms of temporomandibular joint health. No reports in the recent literature evaluate the association between the use of posterior bite turbos and condylar position changes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate condylar position changes occurring after three-month treatment with posterior bite turbo in patients from the Dental School of the Universidad del Valle. Methods: a sample of 15 hyperdivergent patients was randomly distributed into two groups: Bite Turbo and Control Group. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CB-CT) was used to assess the condyle position before the bite turbos bonding to first and second molars, and after three months of use of the appliances. Distances were taken from the CB-CT by a single operator, and the calibration was tested with intraclass correlation (> 0.9). Results: no statistical difference between the position of left and right condyles was detected. However, there was a significant difference in the upper space of the left condyle between the initial and final measurement. Patients reported satisfactory use of the occlusal bite turbo (85.8%) in three months of treatment. Conclusion: contrary to the expected, the simultaneous use of posterior occlusal appliances with balanced mandibular movements for 3 months did not cause significant changes in condylar position. The patients tolerate well the use of occlusal stops.



= 88 veces | PDF
= 63 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Santiago Herrera-Guardiola, Universidad del Valle

Odontólogo, Especialista en Ortodoncia - Universidad del Valle. Practica Privada - Cali, Colombia

German Eduardo Puerta Salazar, Universidad del Valle

Profesor Especialidad en Ortodoncia, Universidad del Valle, Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia

Carlos Humberto Martinez Cajas, UNICOC-Cali

Odontólogo, Máster en Epidemiología. UNICOC. Cali, Colombia


Friedman MH, Weisber J. Application of orthopedic principles in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. Phys Ther. 1982; 62(5): 597-603. DOI:

Hidaka O, Adashi S, Takada K. The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72(4): 295-301. DOI:;2

Posselt U. Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1969.

Wang L, Lazebnik M, Detamore MS. Hyaline cartilage cells outperform mandibular condylar cartilage cells in a TMJ fibrocartilage tissue engineering application. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009; 17(3): 346 - 53. DOI:

Tsuruta A, Yamada K, Hanada K, Hosogai A, Kohno S, Koyama J et al. The relationship between morphological changes of the condyle and condylar position in the glenoid fossa. J Orofac Pain. 2004; 18(2):148-55.

Watted N, Witt E, Kenn W. The temporomandibular joint and the disc-condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23(6): 683-93. DOI:

Mejia CA, Salazar L. Desarrollo ontogénico de la articulación temporo-mandibular durante el periodo fetal. Revista Estomatológica. 1996; 6:1-72.

Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Articulators in orthodontics: an evidence-based perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(2): 299-308. DOI:

McNamara J, Seligman D, Okeson J. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9(1): 73-90.

Kozlowski J. Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence. Clin Impressions. 2008; 16: 23-8.

Iscan HN, Sarisoy L. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112(2): 171-8. DOI:

Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. Journal Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(6): 411-29. DOI:

Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(4): 411-7. DOI:;2

Karl P, Foley T. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69(2): 117-25. DOI:;2

Rinchuse D, Kandasamy S. Myths of orthodontic gnathology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 322-30.

Tamaki K, Ikeda T, Wake H, Toyoda M. An assessment of condylar dynamics associated with grinding movements. Part 1: Pattern analysis of condylar dynamics. Prosthodont Res Pract. 2007; 6:28-33.

Gidarakou IK, Tallents RH, Kyrkanides S, Stein S, Moss ME. Comparison of skeletal and dental morphology in asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients with normal temporomandibular joints. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(2): 116-20. DOI:;2

Pahkala R, Qvarnstrom M. Can Temporomandibular dysfunction signs be predicted by early morphological or functional variables? Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26: 367-73.

Ikeda K, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(4): 495-501. DOI:

Girardot RA. Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial skeletal types. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71(4): 240-46. DOI:;2

van Eijden TM. Biomechanics of the mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000; 11(1): 123-36. DOI:

Nebbe B, Major PW. Prevalence of TMJ disc displacement in a pre-orthodontic adolescent sample. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(6): 454-63. DOI:;2

How to Cite
Herrera-Guardiola, S., Puerta Salazar, G. E., & Martinez Cajas, C. H. (2020). CONDYLAR POSITION CHANGES AFTER THREE MONTHS OF TREATMENT WITH POSTERIOR BITE TURBO. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 32(1).