Mechanical and non-mechanical orthodontic procedures in relapse and retention: scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v32n2a8Keywords:
Orthodontics, Literature review as topic, Orthodontic appliances, Orthodontic retainersAbstract
Introduction: stability after orthodontic treatment is an important goal for orthodontists. This issue has been highly important in orthodontics, so its progress and content require constant analysis. Methods: a panoramic and analytical review of citations and keywords from Web of Science helped create a body of information on the current advances in research on this field. Results: several fields of research arise from the analysis, dealing with surgery as an approach, molecular concepts, orthodontists’ experiences in profesional practice, and the use of lasers and other applications. Conclusions: information on relapse and retention within orthodontics is still valid and requires further research on current issues to understand this complex phenomenon for both academia and clinical use.
Downloads
References
Albaladejo A, Leonés AM. La contención natural como solución a la recidiva ortodóncica. Gaceta dental. 2006; 169: 134-48.
Ustrell JM. Retencion postortodoncica fija y estética. Rev Eur Odontoestomatol. 1994; 6(6): 357-62.
Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J. 2017; 62(1 Suppl): 50-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12475
Padmos JA, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153(4): 496-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013
Littlewood SM, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006; 33(3): 205-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021624
Garcia Costa J, Galindo TM, Mattos CT, Cury-Saramago AA. Retention period after treatment of posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017; 22(2): 35-44. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590%2F2177-6709.22.2.035-044.oar
Wasserman I, Ferrer K, Gualdrón J, Jiménez N, Mateos L. Retenedores fijos en ortodoncia: revisión sistemática. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2016; 28(1): 139-57. DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v28n1a8
Gómez M, Herrera Luz E, Suárez Á, Sánchez G. Efectividad de la retención post ortodoncia en pacientes de 12-35 años relacionada con 2 tipos de retención fija: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Odontoestomatologia. 2017; 19(29): 18-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22592/ode2017n29p18.
Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, Strifler L, Ghassemi M, Ivory J et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015; 13(224): 1-15.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(143).
Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for research evidence synthesis: the scoping review approach. J Hosp Med. 2019; 14(7): 416-18.
Gálvez C. El campo de investigación del análisis de redes sociales en el área de las ciencias de la documentación: un análisis de co-citación y co-palabras. Revista general de información y documentación. 2018; 28(2): 455-75.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017; 111(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Mangan R. Web of Science: manual de uso. España: FECYT; 2019.
Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS, Chen J, Koepsell T, Philippe H. Stability of treatment for anterior openbite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(2): 154-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.019
Enaia M, Niko B, Ruf S. White-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: a challenge for clinical excellence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(1): e17-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.016
Baek MS, Yoon JC, Hyung SY, Lee KJ, Kwak J, Park YC. Long-term stability of anterior open-bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(4): 396–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.023
Ko EWC, Hsu SSP, Hsieh HY, Wang YC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(5): 1469-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022
Valiathan M, Hughes E. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(2): 170-77.
Kobayashi T, Izumi N, Kojima T, Sagakami N, Saito I, Saito C. Progressive condylar resorption after mandibular advancement. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 50(2): 176-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.02.006
Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(5): 614-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.041
Gkantidis N, Christou P, Topouzelis N. The orthodontic-periodontic interrelationship in integrated treatment challenges: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(5): 377-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02068.x
Palomares NB, Celeste RK, de Oliveira BH, Miguel JA. How does orthodontic treatment affect young adults’ oral health-related quality of life? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141(6): 751-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.015
Tynelius GE, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention—a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(5): 542–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp145
Brezulier D, Turpin YL, Sorel O. A protocol for treatment of minor orthodontic relapse during retention. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12227
Armstrong A, Oliver D, Araújo EA, Thiesen G, Kim KB. Comparing orthodontic relapse of mandibular anterior teeth with traditional bonded versus magnetic retainers after 2 years of retention. J World Fed Orthod. 2017; 6 (2): 45-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2017.04.003
Edman T, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in Class I four premolar extraction cases – stability after 2 years in retention. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013; 16(2): 105–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12011
Andriekute AA; Vasiliauskas, A; Sidlauskas, A. A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention. Prog Orthod. 2017; 18. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs40510-017-0185-x
Pratt MC, Klumper GT, Hartsfield JK, Fardo D, Nash DA. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 14(4): 520–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.023
Al-Jewair TS, Hamidaddin MA, Alotaibi HM, Alqahtani ND, Albarakati SF, Alkofide EA et al. Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2016; 37(8): 895-901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.8.14570
Rahman NA, Fui Low T, Shaheera Idris N. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia. Korean J Orthod. 2016; 46(1): 36-41. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4041%2Fkjod.2016.46.1.36
Renkema AM, Sips Hélène ET, Bronkhorst E, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in the Netherlands. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(4): 432–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn131
Bjering R, Birkeland K, Vandeuska-Radunovic V. Anterior tooth alignment: a comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment. Angle Orthod. 2015; (85): 353–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/051414-349.1
Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Von den Hoff JW, Ongkosuwito EM. Relapse revisited – animal studies and its translational application to the orthodontic office. Semin Orthod. 2017; 23(4): 390-98. DOI: https://doi.or/10.1053/j.sodo.2017.07.009
Peck S. Extractions, retention and stability: the search for orthodontic truth. Eur J Orthod. 2017; 39(2): 109–15.
Chaison JB, Chen CS, Herring SW, Bolle AM. Bone volume, tooth volume, and incisor relapse: A 3-dimensional analysis of orthodontic stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(6): 778-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.032
Franzen TJ, Zahra SE, El-Kadi A, Vandevska-Radunovic V. The influence of low-level laser on orthodontic relapse in rats. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 37(1): 111-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju053
Franzen TJ, Brudvik P, Vandevska-Radunovic V. Periodontal tissue reaction during orthodontic relapse in rat molars. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35(2): 152–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr127
Feng L, Yang R, Liu D, Wang X, Song Y, Cao H et al. PDL Progenitor–Mediated PDL recovery contributes to orthodontic relapse. J Dent Res. 2016; 95(9): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516648604
Kanzaki H, Shinohara F, Itohiya-Kasuya K, Ishikawa M, Nakamura Y. Nrf2 activation attenuates both orthodontic tooth movement and relapse. J Dent Res. 2015; 94(6): 787-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515577814
Schneider DA, Smith SM, Campbell C, Hayami T, Kapila S, Hatch NE. Locally limited inhibition of bone resorption and orthodontic relapse by recombinant osteoprotegerin protein. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015; 18(Suppl.1): 187–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12086
Zhao N, Lin J, Kanzaki H, Ni J, Chen Z, Liang W, Liu Y. Local osteoprotegerin gene transfer inhibits relapse of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141(1): 30-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.035
Dolci GS, Portela LV, de Souza DO, Medeiros Fos AC. Atorvastatin-induced osteoclast inhibition reduces orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(3): 528-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.026
McManus A, Ultreja A, Chen J, Kalajzic Z, Yang W, Nanda R et al. Evaluation of BSP expression and apoptosis in the periodontal ligament during orthodontic relapse: a preliminary study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014; 17(4): 239-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12049
Al-Duliamy MJ, Ghaid NH, Omar AK, Abdullah BH. Enhancement of orthodontic anchorage and retention by the local injection of strontium: an experimental study in rats. Saudi Dent J. 2015; 27(1): 22-9. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sdentj.2014.08.001
Liu Y, Zhang T, Zhang C, Jin SS, Yang RL, Wang XD. Aspirin blocks orthodontic relapse via inhibition of CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Dent Res. 2017; 1(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022034516685527
Sonesson M, De Geer E, Subraian J, Petrén S. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in accelerating tooth movement,
preventing relapse and managing acute pain during orthodontic treatment in humans: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(11): 2-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0242-8
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Copyright comprises moral and patrimonial rights.
1. Moral rights: are born at the moment of the creation of the work, without the need to register it. They belong to the author in a personal and unrelinquishable manner; also, they are imprescriptible, unalienable and non negotiable. Moral rights are the right to paternity of the work, the right to integrity of the work, the right to maintain the work unedited or to publish it under a pseudonym or anonymously, the right to modify the work, the right to repent and, the right to be mentioned, in accordance with the definitions established in article 40 of Intellectual property bylaws of the Universidad (RECTORAL RESOLUTION 21231 of 2005).
2. Patrimonial rights: they consist of the capacity of financially dispose and benefit from the work trough any mean. Also, the patrimonial rights are relinquishable, attachable, prescriptive, temporary and transmissible, and they are caused with the publication or divulgation of the work. To the effect of publication of articles in the journal Revista de la Facultad de Odontología, it is understood that Universidad de Antioquia is the owner of the patrimonial rights of the contents of the publication.
The content of the publications is the exclusive responsibility of the authors. Neither the printing press, nor the editors, nor the Editorial Board will be responsible for the use of the information contained in the articles.
I, we, the author(s), and through me (us), the Entity for which I, am (are) working, hereby transfer in a total and definitive manner and without any limitation, to the Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, the patrimonial rights corresponding to the article presented for physical and digital publication. I also declare that neither this article, nor part of it has been published in another journal.
Open Access Policy
The articles published in our Journal are fully open access, as we consider that providing the public with free access to research contributes to a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Creative Commons License
The Journal offers its content to third parties without any kind of economic compensation or embargo on the articles. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, known as Attribution – NonCommercial – Share Alike (BY-NC-SA), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited and that the new productions are licensed under the same conditions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
