Strength of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded with two different adhesives


  • Karlla Elizabeth Pezo-Vargas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Joyce Mariana Salinas-Francia Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • John Alexis Domínguez Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia



Adhesives, Ceramics, Tensile strength


Introduction: lithium disilicate ceramics are an excellent choice in rehabilitation, made with the technique of injection or machining. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two adhesive systems on the values of binding resistance in injected and machined lithium disilicate ceramics. Methods: lithium disilicate disks, IPS e. were used Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Swiss), 10mm in diameter and 1mm in thickness embedded in PVC tubes. Was distributed in 4 working groups, 2 in injected lithium ceramics and 2 in machined, Palfique Bond and Tetric N-bond Universal adhesives were applied according to the group distribution, then photopolymerized for 10 seconds with led light bulb, Tygon® tubes were placed for filling with fluid resin; once the Tygon® tubes were removed. The samples were taken to a universal testing machine where the micro-spraying test was performed. Results: the most significant binding resistance values were found in lithium disisilicate ceramics adhered with the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive having a significant difference (p= 0,001), the bond strength values of the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive in injected ceramic did not differ significantly. Conclusion: machined lithium disilicate ceramics have better values of binding resistance to micro-spraying.

= 171 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 155 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Karlla Elizabeth Pezo-Vargas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Estudiante de pregrado. Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú

Joyce Mariana Salinas-Francia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Estudiante de pregrado. Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

John Alexis Domínguez, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

PhD en Dentística Restauradora. Docente, Departamento de Odontología Social, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú


Poss S. The rapid evolution of restorative dentistry. Dent Econ. 2013; 103(3): 58-60.

Figueroa RI, Cruz FG, de Carvalho RF, Leite FPP, Chaves MGAM. Rehabilitación de los dientes anteriores con el sistema cerámico disilicato de litio. Int J Odont. 2014; 8(3): 469-74. DOI:

Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28(3): 227-35. DOI:

Warreth A, Elkareimi Y. All-ceramic restorations: a review of the literature. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32(8): 365-72. DOI:

Salazar-López C, Quintana-del Solar M. Rehabilitación estética-funcional combinando coronas de disilicato de Litio en el sector anterior y coronas metal-cerámica en el sector posterior. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2016; 26(2): 102-09. DOI:

Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, Nejat AH, Burgess JO. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120(1): 132-7. DOI:

Saavedra R, Iriarte R, Oliveira Junior OB, Moncada G. Clasificación y significado clínico de las diferentes formulaciones de las cerámicas para restauraciones dentales. Acta Odont Venez. 2014; 52(2).

González ACC, Mejía ED. Alternatives of surface treatments for adhesion of lithium disilicate ceramics. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2018; 55(1): 59-72.

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(26): 3757-85. DOI:

Mandri MN, Aguirre AGB, Zamudio ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología Restauradora. Odontoestomatología. 2015; 17(26): 50-6.

Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(5): 467-77. DOI:

Tian T, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2014; 30(7): 147-62. DOI:

Zamorano Pino X, Aránguiz VV, Juliá VP, Pino CS. Micromorfología superficial de 2 cerámicas grabables tratadas con diferentes ácidos. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2016; 9(1): 30-5. DOI:

Yao C, Zhou L, Yang H, Wang Y, Sun H, Guo J et al. Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017; 125(2): 173-80. DOI:

Moncada G, García Fonseca R, de Oliveira OB, Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P. Rol del 10-metacriloxidecilfosfato dihidrogenado en el cambio de paradigma de los sistemas adhesivos integrados en la dentina. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7(3): 194-9. DOI:

Álvarez-Fernández MA, Peña -López JM, González-González IR, Olay-García MS. Características generales y propiedades de las cerámicas sin metal. RCOE. 2003; 8(5): 525-46.

Caparroso Pérez C, Duque Vargas JA. Cerámicas y sistemas para restauraciones CAD-CAM: una revisión. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2010; 22(1): 88-108.

Willard A, Chu TMG. The Science and application of IPS e.Max dental ceramic. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018; 34(4): 238-42. DOI:

Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004; 20(5): 441-8. DOI:



How to Cite

Pezo-Vargas, K. E., Salinas-Francia, J. M., & Domínguez, J. A. (2022). Strength of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded with two different adhesives. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 34(2).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.