Genetic parameters of days open in Charolais cattle of Cuba

Authors

  • José L Espinosa Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur
  • Dianelys González Peña
  • Alejandro Palacios Espinoza
  • Ricardo Ortega
  • Ariel Guillén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324960

Keywords:

beef cattle, fertilit, genetic correlations, heritability, post-partum interval

Abstract

 there is little information in Cuba regarding the genetic components of the postpartum period in beef cattle. Objective: to compare estimates of genetic parameters of days open (DO) obtained with three models in Charolais cattle of Cuba. Methods: data from individual reproductive control of Charolais cattle from 17 herds in two Cuban companies were analyzed. The sample consisted of 16,891 calvings from 4,593 cows, daughters of 190 sires and 2,770 dams. Up to 10 parities per female between years 1981 and 2005 were considered. The WOMBAT program was used to estimate variance components. Three models were applied; an univariate model (UM) for each separate parity until the sixth calving; a repeatability model (RM) with all parities; and a random regression model (ARM) taking the number of calving as an independent variable. Results: the overall average for DO was 171 ± 93 days. The trend of the average value for DO in each calving was decreasing from the first to the tenth parity, with a seasonal performance around 155 days between the fourth and eighth calving. DO heritability estimated by UM was variable, with values of 0.03 for the first calving and 0.06 for the sixth. These variations cannot be observed with RM that estimated a heritability of 0.06. Values of 0.05 in the first calving until 0.07 in the tenth were estimated with ARM. Genetic correlations among DO for different parities were close to unity. Conclusions: changes of the estimated heritability for DO through the productive life of a female can be observed with ARM. The heritability estimates were low and did not differ from the results reported in other beef cattle breeds.

|Abstract
= 488 veces | PDF
= 175 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arellano S, Martínez J, Romero E, Briones F, Domínguez M, de la Garza F. Factores genético-ambientales que afectan el intervalo entre partos y días al primer parto del ganado de doble propósito en el norte de Veracruz. AIA 2006; 10:43-53.Bertipaglia EC, Gomes da Silva R, Cardoso V, Campos AS. Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos e fenotípicos de características do pelame e de desempenho reprodutivo de vacas holandesas em clima tropical. R Bras Zootec 2007; 36:350-9.Chang YM, Andersen Ramberg IM, Heringstad B, Gianola D, Klementsdal G. Bivariate analysis of number of services to conception and days open in Norwegian Red using a censored threshold-linear model. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:772-8.De Luna R, Guerra D, González Peña D, Espinoza JL, Palacios A, Núñez R. Componentes de (co)varianza de caracteres reproductivos y su relación genética con el peso al destete en ganado Cebú de Cuba. Tec Pecu Mex 2008; 46:225-34.

Espinoza JL, Palacios A, de Luna R, Ávila N, Guerra D, González-Peña D, Rodríguez F, Mellado M. Componentes de (co)varianza para caracteres de crecimiento y reproducción en Ganado cebú en Cuba. Arch Zootec 2007; 56:919-27.Estrada León RJ, Magaña JG, Segura Correa JC. Genetic parameters for reproductive traits of Brown Swiss cows in the tropics of Mexico. J Anim Vet Adv 2008; 7:124-9.Ghiasi H, Pakdel A, Nejati Javaremi A, Meharabani Yeganeh H, Honarvar M, González Recio O, Carabaño MJ, Alenda R. Genetic variance components for female fertility in Iranian Holstein cows. Livest Sci 2011; 139:277-80.González Peña D, Espinoza Villavicencio JL, Guerra D, Palacios A, Evora JC, Portales A. Components of (co)variante of the days open in Siboney dairy cows. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2010; 62:136-43.Goyache F, Gutiérrez JP, Fernández I, Royo LJ, Álvarez I. Genetic analysis of days opens in beef cattle. Livest Prod Sci 2005; 93:283-9. Gressler MGM, Pereira JCC, Bergmann JAG, Andrade VJ, Paulino MF, Gressler SL. Aspectos genéticos do peso à desmama e de algumas características reprodutivas de fêmeas Nelore. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2005; 57:533-8. Guerra Iglesias D, Espinoza Villavicencio JL, Palacios Espinosa A, González Peña D, Rodríguez Almeida F, Guillen Trujillo A. Componentes de (co)varianza de los días abiertos en bovinos Santa Gertrudis. Tec Pecu Mex 2009; 47:145-55.Jansen J, Van der Werf J, de Woer W. Genetic relationships between fertility traits for dairy cows in different parities. Livest Prod Sci 1987; 17:337-49.Meirelles S, Espasandin AC, Mattar M, de Queiroz S. Genetic and environmental effects on sexual precocity traits in Nellore cattle. R Bras Zootec 2009; 38:1488-93.Meyer K. WOMBAT- Digging deep for quantitative genetics analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress of Genetic Applied to Livestock Production; 2006 Aug 13-18; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Mialon MM, Renend G, Krauss D, Ménissier F. Genetic relationship between cyclic ovarian activity in heifers and cows and beef traits in males. Genet Sel Evol 2001; 33:273-87.ONE. Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas. República de Cuba 2008; [Access date: December 1, 2014]. URL:http://www.one.cu/publicaciones/50aniversario/medio%20ambiente/public%20completa.pdf.Oseni S, Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Rekaya R. Genetic parameters for days open and pregnancy rates in US Holsteins using different editing criteria. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:4327-33.Ossa G, Suárez M, Pérez J. Factores ambientales y genéticos relacionados con el intervalo entre partos en la raza Romosinuano. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2006; 11:799-805.Oyama K, Katsuta T, Anada K, Mukai F. Genetic parameters for reproductive performance of breeding cows and carcass traits of fattening animals in Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle. Anim Sci 2004; 78:195-201.Pantelić V, Sretenović L, Ostojić-Andrić D, Trivunović S, Petrović MM, Aleksić S, Dragana R. Heritability and genetic correlation of production and reproduction traits of Simmental cows. Afr J Biotech 2011; 10:7117-21.Philipsson, J. Genetic aspects of female fertility in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci 1981; 8:307-19.Restrepo G, Pizarro E, Quijano JH. Índices de selección y niveles independientes de descarte para dos características productivas y reproductivas en un hato Holstein (Bos taurus). Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2008; 21:239-50.Santana Y, Guerra D, Veliz D, Falcón R, Rodríguez M, González-Peña D, Ortíz J. Parámetros genéticos y no genéticos que afectan las características reproductivas de la hembra Cebú en Cuba. Rev Cubana Reprod Anim 2004; 30:39-46. Schaeffer LR. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci 2004; 86:35-45.Spasić Z, Stolić N, Milošević B, Ilić Z, Anđušić L. Age influence at the first insemination and the service period on longevity and life-long production of milk in Simmental cows. Macedonian J Anim Sci 2012; 2:253-6.Véliz D, Guerra D, Falcón R, Santana Y, Rodríguez M, González-Peña D. Parámetros genéticos y no genéticos que afectan la reproducción en la raza Santa Gertrudis. Rev Cubana Reprod Anim 2004; 30:53-8. Zambrano JC, Echeverri J. Genetic and environmental variance and covariance parameters for some reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Antioquia (Colombia). R Bras Zootec 2014; 43:132-9.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-05

How to Cite

Espinosa, J. L., González Peña, D., Palacios Espinoza, A., Ortega, R., & Guillén, A. (2016). Genetic parameters of days open in Charolais cattle of Cuba. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 29(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324960

Issue

Section

Original research articles

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.