Alternative feedstuffs for swine in Colombia: what are our options?

Jorge Hernán Agudelo

doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.324454

Autores/as

Jorge Hernán Agudelo Editor para Producción Animal - Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324454

Palabras clave:

alternative feedstuffs, byproducts, corn, feed, swine

Resumen

Resumen

Tanto la creciente demanda de granos para la alimentación humana, como la reciente crisis generada por la producción de etanol a partir de maíz en el principal productor mundial del grano, están acorralando a los porcicultores en muchos países, incluido Colombia. Los altos precios del maíz obligan a los formuladores de alimento a buscar fuentes energéticas alternativas para alimentar los cerdos. A pesar de que en Colombia se produce una gran variedad de cosechas durante todo el año, no hay muchas alternativas para reemplazar efectivamente al maíz. Las limitaciones presentadas por los potenciales ingredientes alternativos y sus derivados son, principalmente, sus altos contenidos de agua y/o fibra.

|Resumen

= 105 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 42 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Close WH. Fibrous diets for pigs. In: Animal Production in Developing Countries. Brit J Anim Prod; Occasional Publication No. 16. Midlothian (UK): Gill M, Owen E, Pollot GE, Lawrence TLJ, editors; 1993. p.107-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263967X00031128

Cromwell GL, Coffey RD. Phosphorus – a key essential nutrient, yet a possible major pollutant – its central role in animal nutrition. In: Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Lyons TP, editor. Proceedings of the Alltech’s 7th Annual Symposium. Nicholasville (KY): Alltech Technical Publications; 1991. p.133-145.

Cunha TJ. Swine Feeding and Nutrition. London: Academic Press; 1977.

Dierick NA, Vervaeke IJ, Demeyer DI, Decuypere JA. Approach to the energetic importance of fi bre digestion in pigs. I. Importance of fermentation in the overall energy supply. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1989; 23:141-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(89)90095-3

Ensminger ME, Oldfi eld JE, Heinemann WW. Feeds and Nutrition. 2nd ed. Clovis (CA): The Ensminger Publishing Company; 1990.

Fadel JG. Quantitative analyses of selected plant by-product feedstuffs, a global perspective. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1999; 79:255-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00031-0

FAO, 2004. World cereal supply situation (In: Part II: World and Regional Review: Facts and Figures). In: The State of Food and Agriculture 2003-2004

Available: ht tp://www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/DOCREP/006/Y5160E/Y5160E00.HTM. Accessed: May 5, 2005.FAO, 2009. Key Statistics of Food and Agricultural External Trade.Available: http://www.fao.org/es/ESS/toptrade/trade.asp. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2009

Feedstuffs. Cash market comparisons. 2004; Vol 76. No 30. p.33.

Grieshop CM, Reese DE, Fahey GC. Nonstarch polysaccharides and oligosaccharides in swine nutrition. In: Swine Nutrition, 2nd ed. Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2001. p.107-130.

Jongbloed AW, Everts H, Kemme PA, Mroz Z. Quantifi cation of absorbability and requirements of macroelements. In: A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. Kyriazakis I, editor. New York: CABI Publishing; 1999. p.275-298.

Martínez CH, Acevedo GX. La cadena de alimentos balanceados para animales (aba) en Colombia: una mirada global de su estructura y dinámica. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Bogotá, Colombia. In: Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural: Observatorio Agrocadenas Colombia. Available: http://www.agrocadenas.gov.co. Accessed: Dec 18, 2004.

Miller ER, Holden PJ, Leibbrandt VD. By-products in swine diets. Pork Industry Handbook (no. 108), Coop. Ext. Ser., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette (IN), USA. 1994.

Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia. Available: http://www.agrocadenas.gov.co/cereales/reportes/Imp_arm_24.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2005.

Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia. Available: http://www.agrocadenas.gov.co/indicadores/ind_sec_comercio2.htm. Accessed: Feb 10, 2009.Myer RO, Brendemuhl JH. Miscellaneous feedstuffs. In: Swine Nutrition, 2nd ed. Lewis AJ and Southern LL (Eds). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2001. p.839-64.

Myer R, Hall MB. Guideline for using alternative feedstuffs. Animal Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Available: http://edis.ifas.ufl .edu. Accessed: Jul 20, 2004.

National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th edition. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1998.Noblet J, Le-Goff G. Effect of dietary fi ber on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2001; 90:35-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00195-X

Oke OL. Cassava meal. In: Non Traditional Feed Sources for Use in Swine Production. Thacker PA, Kirkwood RN, editors. Stoneham (MA): Butterworth Publishers; 1990.

Pond WG. Thoughts on fi ber utilization in swine. J Anim Sci 1987; 65:497-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.652497x

Sauber TE, Owens FN. Cereal grains and byproducts for swine. In: Swine Nutrition, 2nd ed. Lewis AJ and Southern LL, editors. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2001. p.785-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041842.ch35

Wisemann J, Cole DJ. Predicting the energy content of pig feeds. In: Recent Developments in Pig Nutrition. Cole DJ, Haresign W, editors. Kent (England): Butterworths; 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-407-00339-2.50007-8