Hermeneutical Model of Due Process in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.14147Keywords:
due process, fundamental right, hermeneutics, judge, justiciability, principles, constitutional values, practical reasonAbstract
This article proposes a hermeneutic model based on due process as a fundamental right or constitutional principle, which enables, in the application of procedural rules, the attribution of sense in defense of man/woman and his/her well-known values as cultural expression of the Constitutional and Democratic Rule of Law. It is about to vindicate the guarantor voice in the process, so that it forms and develops from its dialectical character governed by impartiality, cooperation, freedom, equality, and human dignity. In this structure, judges are spokesmen of the practical reason in each specific case and, therefore, they assume the legal and constitutional duty to make of law the best work of art.
Downloads
References
AGUDELO RAMÍREZ, Martín (2004). Introducción al Estudio del Derecho Procesal. Una aproximación dogmática, constitucional y filosófica a la Teoría General del Proceso. Medellín: Señal Editora, 444 p.
ALEXY, Robert (1993). Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 607 p.
ATIENZA, Manuel. El derecho como argumentación. En: Isegoría: Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política. Madrid. No. 21 (nov, 1999). p. 37-47.
BACHOF, Otto (1985). Jueces y Constitución. Madrid: Civitas S.A, 69 p.
BERLIN, Isaiah (1983). Contra la corriente: ensayos sobre historia de las ideas. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 455 p.
BERNAL PULIDO, Carlos (2007). El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 883 p.
______________________ (2005). El derecho de los derechos. Escritos sobre la aplicación de los derechos fundamentales. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 417 p.
BOBBIO, Norberto (2009). Teoría general de la política. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 779 p.
BERMAN, Harold (2001). La formación de la tradición jurídica de occidente. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 675 p.
CALAMANDREI, Piero (2005). Instituciones de Derecho Procesal Civil. Bogotá: Leyer, 505 p.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro (2002). El testimonio de la parte en el sistema de la oralidad. Contribución a la teoría de la utilización probatoria del saber de las partes en el proceso civil. Buenos Aires: Librería Editora Platense.
CARNELUTTI, Francesco (1993). Las miserias del proceso penal. Bogotá: Temis, 107 p.
CARPIO MARCOS, Edgar (2004). La interpretación de los derechos fundamentales. Lima: Palestra editores, 166 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.
