Critic to major contract consensus theories: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.20035Keywords:
Consensus, Critical Pluralism, Rationality, Repair, JusticeAbstract
The issue of social justice as ethical and political problem in the globalized world, within contemporary democratic societies, is the company legal and political and ethical-moral undertaking the best scholars of the humanities. This is the theme of that address two major contemporary thinkers Jürguen Habermas and John Rawls, each from their discipline of knowledge, but in both cases through the methodology implementation involve conceptual gadget, procedural social actors, into a contractual agreement, which would act as guarant or political ethical achieving Justice. However, these authors raises their conceptual buildings beyond, behind, from the concrete realities of indigenous ethno-culturally well established. It is there, where I propose to address the issue from the field of education, instead of thinking only follow from political or from the ethical, for which the concept of critical pluralism as opposed to contractual consensus, raised by the Canadian philosopher Peter McLaren, enter to filling conceptual gaps in these theories in favor of a more real and human theory.
Downloads
References
Ardoino, J. (1987).Perspectiva política de la educación,Madrid: Editorial Porrua.
Austin, L. (1982).Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
Berlin, I. (1983). ¿Existe Aún la Teoría Política?, Ciudad de México: Editorial Aguilar s.a.
Bobbio, N. (1996). La política en Norberto Bobbio, Ciudad de México: Editorial Arte y fotografía s.a.
Chatino, J. (1999). Revista Internacional de Filosofía. N° 14.
Cepeda rodríguez, J. (1999). Revista Internacional de Filosofía. N° 14.
Habermas, J. (1999). Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa I y II,Madrid: Editorial Taurus.
Habermas, J, Rawls, J. (1998). Debate Sobre el Liberalismo Político, Barcelona:Editorial Paino.
Habermas, J. (1999). Facticidad y Validez,Barcelona: Editorial Paino.
Juls, P, Legrand, L. (1999).Grandes orientaciones de la pedagogía contemporánea,Madrid: Editorial Narcea.
MacIntyre, A. (1987). Tras la Virtud, Barcelona: Editorial Paino.
Mead, G. (2006). Espíritu, Persona y Sociedad,Barcelona: Editorial Cisspraxis.
McLaren, P. (1991). Pedagogía crítica, resistencia cultural y producción del deseo,Buenos Aires: Editorial Aique.
Platón. (1979). La República, Madrid: Editorial Edaf.
Rawls, J. (1971). La Teoría de La Justicia, Barcelona: Editorial Puigcerda.
Rawls, J. (1996). Liberalismo Político, Bogotá: Editorial Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Sartori, G. (1992). Elementos de la Teoría Política, Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.
