Apparent ritual excess in the colombian constitucional jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.21668Keywords:
excess obvious ritual, procedural forms, prevalence of substantive law, arbitrary decision, effective judicial protectionAbstract
The article illustrates about the construction of the figure of creating jurisprudence, called apparent ritual excess, framed within the defect in the proceedings, as appropriate grounds for protection against court orders. Intended to be a reflection of the prevalence of substantive law and material justice, against the procedural formalities, differentiating between them and process the proper forms, the latter element of the fundamental right to law. Also aims to clarify a possible tension between the principle of legal certainty and the principle of substantive justice, discussion it was settled by the Constitutional Court in favor of the latter, in favor of a genuine security through the providence that fits the objective legal truth.
Downloads
References
CARNELUTTI, Francesco, Sistema de Derecho Procesal Civil, Buenos Aires: UTEHA, 1944.
CLARIÁ OLMEDO, Jorge. Derecho Procesal: Conceptos fundamentales. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Depalma, 1982.
MORALES MOLINA, Hernando. Curso de derecho procesal civil. Sexta edición. Bogotá: Editorial ABC, 1973.
OLIVEIRA, Álvaro, Do Formalismo no processo civil, passim Traducción de Renzo I. Cavani Brain, El formalismo valorativo frente al formalismo excesivo. 4ª ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 2010.
PUPPIO, Vicente. Teoría General del Proceso. Caracas: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2008.
QUINTERO DE PRIETO, Beatriz. El debido proceso. En: Temas Procesales. Octubre, 1997, no. 21, p. 5-39
Corte Constitucional Colombia. Sentencia T-283 (1994)
__________. Sentencia T-452 (1994)
_________. Sentencia T 668 (1997)
__________. Sentencia T 008 (1998)
__________. Sentencia T-267 (2000)
__________. Sentencia T 1180 (2001)
__________. Sentencia C-252 (2001)
__________. Sentencia T-1306 (2001)
__________. SU 159 (2002)
__________. Sentencia T-1123 (2002)
__________. Sentencia T-950 (2003)
__________. Sentencia T-231 (2004)
__________. Sentencia T-289 (2005)
__________. Sentencia T-613 (2005)
__________. Sentencia T-1091 (2008)
__________. Sentencia T-264 (2009)
__________. Sentencia T-599 (2009)
__________. Sentencia T-386 (2010)
__________. Sentencia T-429 (2011)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios de Derecho is governed by the following regulation: Political Constitution of Colombia, article 61; Law 23 of 1982, articles 1 and 2; Law 44 of 1993, chapter II, article 6 and chapter IV, article 51; Law 599 of 2000 through which the Penal Code is issued, articles 270, 271 and 272. In addition, the journal is governed by the guidelines of the National Copyright Directorate and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for Colombia. Finally, it abides by Rectoral Resolution 21231 of 5 August, 2005, through which the Statute on Intellectual Property is issued.
Authors who publish in Estudios de Derecho continue to retain their rights, however, they should bear in mind that the contents of the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license. In this sense, The material created may be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if they credit it. No commercial benefit can be obtained.
