Observations on the look: conceptual and methodological matters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.12049Keywords:
psychoanalysis, Lacan, look, methodologyAbstract
This work aims to make a criticism of three recent bibliographic productions about the object look, under the objective of clarifying a minimum of crucial questions that should be answered in order to conceptually grasp this form ofobject little a in Lacan’s psychoanalysis. Therefore, the clarifying of the criticism of these references does not do a mere “destructive” reading, but it seeks to go through the formulations and approaches that others have done in order to delimit a study field through its most recent state of art.
Downloads
References
Lacan, J. (1981) El seminario Libro 1: Los escritos técnicos de Freud(1953-1954). R. Cevasco y V. Mira Pascual (Trads.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Lacan, J.(1994) El seminario Libro 4: La relación de objeto(1956-57). E. Berenguer (Trad). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Lacan, J.(2007) El seminario Libro 10: La angustia(1962-63). E. Berenguer (Trad.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Lacan, J.(1986) El seminario Libro 11: Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis(1964). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Lacan, J.(inédito) “El seminario 12: Problemas cruciales para el psicoanálisis”. Grupo Verbum (Trad. Efba).
Nasio, D. (1988) Los ojos de Laura. El concepto de objeto a en la teoría de J. Lacan. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu.
Negro de Leserre, M. (2010) Lo imaginario en la enseñanza de Lacan. Incidencia del objeto mirada en su constitución. Buenos Aires, Argentina: La Barca.
Zimmerman, D. (2009) La mirada, paradigma del objeto en psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Letra Viva.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors authorize the Journal to publish their academic writings in the Journal’s webpage and in any other printed or electronic media propriety of the Journal, as well as in the databases the Journal is registered in. Affectio Societatis acknowledges that moral rights and decision criteria for the material’s subsequent publication in other media falls exclusively within the author’s authority, who for such cases is prompted to give explicit credit to Affectio Societatis..
