Global Economical Justice in the International System of States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12683Keywords:
Liberalism, realism, global justice, human rightsAbstract
This article discusses some of the proposals that modern and contemporary discussions offer on the normative methods for a New International Order. It treats of the possibility of demanding, as a matter of justice, the transformation of the relations of power in the International economical and political orders, between the richest societies and the poorer ones. Four different models of Internal and Interstate State Order are exposed and criticized. First) The realist model of the Absolutist State which establishes peace internally and externally through dissuasion, and which denies that a criteria of justice can be formulated to de ne the relations between states. Second) The Kantian model of State of Law. Third) The Social State of Rawls with two differentiated models of the contract to de ne the relations in the interior and the exterior and Fourth) the Cosmopolitan Project. Finally, the liberal Project of Justice is criticized because it reduces the problem of the Re-Ordering of the International Order to distributive justice and does not question the structures of the actual Global Economic System.
Downloads
References
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. La globalización. Consecuencias humanas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 1999.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. La posmodernidad y sus descontentos. Akal, Madrid, 2001.
BECK, Ulrich. Un nuevo mundo feliz. La precariedad del trabajo en la era de la globalización. Paidós, Barcelona, 2000.
BECK, Ulrich. La sociedad del riesgo. Paidós, Barcelona, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v13i3.1025
BEITZ, Charles R. Political Theory and International Relations. N. J., Princeton, 1979.
BRAND, R., “Von Weltbürgerrecht”, in: Höffe, Ottfried (ed.) Kant: zum ewigen Frieden. Klassiker Auslegen, Vol. 1, Berlin, 1995, pp. 133- 148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050070810-009
CHAUVIER, Stéphane. “Justice and Nakedness” in: Pogge, Thomas (ed.) Global Justice. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 2001, p. 91-105.
CHWASZCZA, Christine. “Anthropologie und Moralphilosophie im ersten Teil des Leviathan”, in: Kersting, W. (Hrsg.) Leviathan oder Stoff, Form und Gewalt eines bürgerlichen und kirlichen Staates. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 83-108.
GERHARD, V. “Ausübende Rechtslehre. Kants Begriff der Politik”, in: Schönrich, G. und Kato, G. Kant in der Diskussion der Moderne. Surhkamp, Francfort, 1996, 464-488.
HABERMAS, J. “La idea kantiana de paz perpetua. Desde la distancia histórica de doscientos años”, en: Isegoría, Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, N°. 16, 1997, Madrid, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.1997.i16.184
HEDLEY, Bull. La sociedad anárquica. Un estudio sobre el orden en la política mundial. Editorial Catarata, Madrid, 2005.
HOBBES, Thomas. Leviatán. La materia, forma y poder de un Estado eclesiástico y civil. Editorial Nacional, Madrid, 1980.
HÖFFE, O. “Volkerbund oder Weltrepublik?”, in: Höffe, Ottfried (ed.) Kant: zum ewigen Frieden. Klassiker Auslegen, Vol. 1, Berlin, 1995.
HÖFFE, Ottfried (ed.) Kant: zum ewigen Frieden. Klassiker Auslegen, Vol. 1, Berlin, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050070810
KANT, Immanuel. Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf, Werke in zwölf Bänden, Edit. W. Weischedel. Suhrkamp, Vol. XI, Frankfurt, 1997.
KANT, Immanuel. Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Werke in zwölf Bänden, Edit. W. Weischedel. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1997, Vol. VIII
KANT, Immanuel. La Metafísica de las Costumbres. Tecnos, Madrid, 1989.
KELSEN, H. La paz por medio del derecho. Editorial Trotta, Madrid,
KERSTING, W. “Die bürgerliche Verfassung in jedem Staate soll republikanisch sein”, in: Höffe, Ottfried (ed.) Kant: zum ewigen Frieden. Klassiker Auslegen, Vol. 1, Berlin, 1995.
LAFONT, Cristina. “Justicia global en una sociedad mundial pluralista”, en: III Congreso Iberoamericano de Filosofía-Memorias, Estudios de Filosofía, Medellín, Octubre 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12881
OCAMPO, José Antonio. Reconstruir el futuro. Globalización, desarrollo y democracia en América Latina. Editorial Norma, Bogotá, 2004.
POGGE, Thomas. “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples”, in: Philosophy and Public Affairs N°. 23, p. 195-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00011.x
POGGE, Thomas. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignity”, in: Ethics 103, p. 48-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293470
POGGE, Thomas. “Rawls and Global Justice”, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, N°. 18, p. 227-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1988.10717175
POGGE, Thomas. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, London, 1989.
POGGE, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. Polity, Oxford, 2002.
RAWLS, J. A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
RAWLS, John. The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
SHUE, Henry. Basic Rights: Subsistence, A uence, and US Foregn Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691200835
STIGLITZ, Joseph E. El malestar en la globalización. Taurus, Madrid, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Francisco Cortés Rodas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
