Danto and pluralism in contemporary art and art criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12959Keywords:
Danto, pluralism, philosophy of art, aesthethic, politicsAbstract
A. C. Danto's approaches to pluralism in contemporary art and art criticism take as a point of reference the eighties, a short period in which pluralism emerged as a theme for artistic consciousness. Artistic movements of the sixties such as pop, minimalism, fluxus, had abolished aesthetics as a criterion for defining art: a work of art could be anything. This could no longer be assimilated by criticism but by the philosophy of art, the only one capable of a concept of transhistoric and pluralist art in itself. However, pluralism in art also requires criticism. The article exposes the difference between art philosophy and art criticism, and to face the challenge of pluralism, the difference between free art criticism and criticism dependent on the institutionalized art world. Finally, the article takes advantage of an allusion by Danto to associate the spirit of pluralism in art and politics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Javier Domínguez Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
