First developments of the stoic theory of fate


  • Laura Liliana Gómez Espíndola Universidad del Valle



Ancient Stoicism, Fate, Fatalism, Divine Reason.


The goal of this article is to clarify the first developments of Zeno, Cleanthes and Chrysippus’ Theory of Fate. In the course of the argumentation it will be clear that all of them considered Fate as identical to Divine Reason, the active principle of Nature responsible for moving and qualifying matter. On those grounds it will be argued, on the one hand, that they held that Fate is part of the intrinsic nature of the world and, on the other hand, that Fate has a universal scope, since all the movements and the qualitative states of the world, even in their smallest details, are produced by Divine Reason. Finally it will be shown that, according to the first developments of the three heads of the school, Fate has a fatalistic mechanism in the production of human life’s events.

= 237 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 172 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Laura Liliana Gómez Espíndola, Universidad del Valle

Departamento de Filosofía
Universidad del Valle
Grupo de investigación Praxis
Cali, Colombia


ARNIM, H. F. A. V. (1903) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta collegit Ioannes ab Arnim. Lipsiae: aedibus B. G. Teubneri.

BOBZIEN, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.

BOTROS, S. (1985) “Freedom, Causality, Fatalism and Early Stoic Philosophy”, en: Phronesis, 30, 274-304.

CALCIDIO. (1962) “Platonis Timaeus translatus commentarioque instructus”, en: J. H. Waszink (Ed.). Londres: Leiden.

CICERÓN (1984). “De natura deorum”, en: Samaranch (Ed.). Sobre la naturaleza de los dioses. Madrid: Sarpe.

CICERÓN (2005) “De Fato”, en: J. Pimentel (Ed.). Del Hado. México: Bibliotheca scriptorum graecorum et romanorum mexicana.

EPÍCTETO (1928a). “Dissertationes ab Arriano digestae”, en: W. A. Old father (Ed.). Discourses. Londres: Loeb Classical Library.

EPÍCTETO (1928b) “Enchiridion”, en: W. A. Oldfather (Ed.). Enchereidon. Londres: Loeb Classical Library.

EUSEBIO (1954-1956) “Preparatio evangelica”, En: e. K. Mras (Ed.). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

FILÓN (1896) "Legum allegoriarum libri i-iii.", en: L. Cohn (Ed.). Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt vol. 1. Berlin: Reimer.

GALENO (1821) “Introductio sive medicus”, en: C. G. Kühn (Ed.). Claudii Galeni opera omnia (Vol. 14). Leipzig: Knobloch.

GOULD, J. (1974) “The Stoic Conception of Fate”, en: Journal of the History of Ideas, 35, 17-32.

LAERCIO, D. (1925) “Vitae philosophorum”, en: R. D. Hicks (Ed.). Lifes of eminent philosophers. Londres: Loeb Classical Library.

LONG, A. (1971) “Freedom and Determinism in the Stoic Theory of Human Action”, en: A. Long (Ed.). Problems in Stoicism. Londres: Athlone Press.

LONG, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic philosophers. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

LIEDL, H. G., SCOTT, R., JONES, H. S., & McKENZIE, R. (1996) A Greek- English lexicon (Rev. y aum. ed.). Oxford New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.

PLUTARCO (1959) “De Stoicorum repugnantiis”, en: R. W. y. M. Pohlenz. (Ed.). Plutarchi moralia (2 ed., Vol. 6). Leipzig: Teubner.

SHARPLES, R.W. (1986) “Soft determinism and freedom in early Stoicism”, en: Phronesis, 31, 266-279.



How to Cite

Gómez Espíndola, L. L. (2012). First developments of the stoic theory of fate. Estudios De Filosofía, (45), 59–80.



Original or Research articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)