Heidegger and the notion of prescience (Vorwissenschaft) as existential propaedeutic. (Part 1: The affection of the time)

  • José Ordóñez García Grupo de Investigación Filosofía Aplicada: Sujeto, Sufrimiento, Sociedad, Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
  • Kurt Rüdinger Grupo de Investigación Filosofía Aplicada: Sujeto, Sufrimiento, Sociedad, Facultad de Filología Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
Keywords: Heidegger, phenomenology, existence, time, prescience

Abstract

Introduction. This article deals with Heidegger’s notion of “prescience” (Vorwissenschaft), since it addresses knowing and thinking, and the incidence of existing features in their activities. First of all there is existence, which is the condition of possibility for any discipline. Time, which determines existence, will become the radical phenomenon that defines human being as Dasein. This is the term given to the subject of “prescience” and that we will translate as Extar, because we believe that this is the best way to understand thinking as characterized by finitude. Methodology. We have developed this work through a hermeneutic analysis of a genealogical nature based on the deployment of beingness. Results and conclusions. Time is not a scientific subject but a pre-scientific one and so it is a topic that concerns ontology rather than science. Not a physical phenomenon but an affective phenomenon.

|Abstract
= 631 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 823 veces| HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 638 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

COLLI, G. (1994) El nacimiento de la Filosofía. Barcelona, Tusquets.

ESCUDERO, J. A. (2009) El lenguaje de Heidegger. Diccionario filosófico 1912-1927. Barcelona, Herder.

FREUD, S. (2001) “El yo y el ello”. En: Obras Completas (vol. 7). Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.

GONZÁLEZ, J. (2008) Heidegger y los relojes. Madrid, Encuentro.

HEIDEGGER, G. (2005) Mein liebes Seelchen! Briefe Martin Heideggers an seine Frau Elfride 1915-1970.

Heidegger, G. (2012) Alma mía. Santiago de Chile: Manantial). München, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

HEIDEGGER, M. (1962) “Die Frage nach der Technik”. En: Die Technik und die Kehre. Pfullingen, Günther Neske, pp. 5-36.

____________ (1984) Was ist das - Die Philosophie? Pfullingen, Günther Neske.

____________ (1988) “Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens”. En: Zur Sache des Denkens. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, pp. 61-80.

____________ (2004) “Der Begriff der Zeit (Vortrag 1924)”. En: Gesamtausgabe (Band 64). Frankfurt a.m., Vittorio Klostermann, pp. 105-125.

LACAN, J. (2001) “La instancia de la letra en el inconsciente o la razón desde Freud”. En: Escritos 1. México, Siglo XXI, pp. 473-512.

____________ (2002) “La ciencia y la verdad”. En: Escritos 2. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, pp. 834-856.

SAFRANSKI, R. (1997) Un maestro de Alemania. M. Heidegger y su tiempo. Barcelona, Tusquets.

Published
2014-11-01
How to Cite
Ordóñez García, J., & Rüdinger, K. (2014). Heidegger and the notion of prescience (Vorwissenschaft) as existential propaedeutic. (Part 1: The affection of the time). Estudios De Filosofía, (50), 155-169. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/21143
Section
Original or Research articles