Wittgenstein and the method of analysis by propositional types in On Certainty

Authors

  • Víctor Hugo Chica Pérez Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n52a08

Keywords:

Wittgenstein, method, propositional types, on certainty, philosophical analysis

Abstract


My purpose in this article is to provide a reconstruction of the mechanics of philosophical analysis that Wittgenstein carried out in “On Certainty”. I will show that this analysis is based, specifically, on an appeal to a wide propositional typology that serves to evaluate and diagnose Moore’s propositions. To this end, I shall first explain how common readings of the methodological issues in “On Certainty” fail. Secondly, I focus on the mechanics of analysis found in paragraphs 1-65, specifically the analysis of three sentences: “There are physical objects”, “I know that there is a hand here” and “here the mistake is impossible”. Thirdly, I proceed to identify different stages of the method and justify in what sense the strategic core of such research is the table of propositional typologies.

|Abstract
= 143 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 141 veces| | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 70 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Víctor Hugo Chica Pérez, Universidad de Antioquia

G.I. Conocimiento, filosofía, ciencia, historia y sociedad
Instituto de Filosofía

References

Baker, G. (2004). Wittgenstein’s Method, Neglected Aspects. K. Morris (Ed.). New York: Blackwell.

Cardona, C. (2011). ¿Es Wittgenstein un fundacionalista? Ideas y Valores, LX (146): 73-95.

Coliva, A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein. Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense. London: Palgrave-Mcmillan.

Engelmann, M. (2013). Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Harré, R. (2008). Grammatical Therapy and the Third Wittgenstein. Metaphilosophy, 39 (4–5): 484-491.

Hilmy, S. (1987). The Later Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.

Minar, E. (2005). On Wittgenstein’s Response to Scepticism: The Opening of On Certainty. En: D. Moyal-Sharrock & W. H. Brenner (Comps.), Readings of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. (pp. 253-274). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Moore, G. E. (1983). Defensa del sentido común y otros ensayos. Carlos Solís (Trans.). Barcelona: Orbis.

Morris, K. (2004). Wittgenstein’s Method Neglected Aspects. Essays on Wittgenstein by Gordon Baker. Oxford: Blackwell.

Moyal-Sharrock D. (2009). Introduction to Proceedings Issue of The Third Wittgenstein. Philosophia, 37 (4): 557-562.

_______. (2004). Understanging Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.

_______. (2007). Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mulhall, S. (2004). Philosophy’s Hidden Essence. PI89–133. En: E. Ammereller & E. Fischer (Eds.). Wittgenstein at Work, Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.

Stroll, A. (1994). Moore and Wittgenstein On Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shmitz, B. (2006). Grammatical Propositions. En: M. Kober (Ed.), Deeping our Understanding of Wittgenstein. New York: Rodopi.

Whittaker, J. (2006). Wittgenstein’s On Certainty: There –like our Life– Rush Rhees; The Third Wittgenstein: The Post-investigations Works – Danièle Moyal- Sharrock; Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty –Edited by Danièle Moyal-Sharrock. Philosophical Investigations 29 (3): 287–300.

Wittgenstein, L. (1988a). Investigaciones filosóficas. (IF). México: UNAM.

_______. (1988b). Sobre la Certeza. (SC). Barcelona: Gedisa.

Published

2015-11-20

How to Cite

Chica Pérez, V. H. (2015). Wittgenstein and the method of analysis by propositional types in On Certainty. Estudios De Filosofía, (52), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n52a08

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.