Karl Leonhard Reinhold y Edmund Husserl. Two Conceptions of the Phenomenology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n53a02Keywords:
Representation, Phenomenon, Reflection, Self-consciousness, Faculty of RepresentationAbstract
A century before Husserl, in order to complete the system of Kantian philosophy, motivated by the ideals of the Enlightenment and its theological and religious questions, Reinhold designed the program to raise “philosophy to a rigorous science.” For this he developed a discipline whose aim is to access -reflexively- to the elementary principles of consciousness, the faculty of representation. This discipline must be validated phenomenologically. Although at first glance the phenomenology of Reinhold (even in its later 1802 version), has several aspects in common with that of Husserl, there are differences of principle. The comparison between these conceptions of phenomenology, the explicit expression of their convergences and differences, allows to clarify, first, in what sense a conception of ‘phenomenon’ restricted to the manifestation is too narrow; second, what are the limits of a theory of self-consciousness based on reflection, according to an “optical” model. Thus, it is shown that, despite its limitations and weaknesses, the phenomenology of Reinhold keeps shedding lights on philosophical inquiry.
Downloads
References
Ahlers, R. (2005) “Differenz, Identität und Indifferenz im Gespräch des deutschen Idealismus um 1802, besonders bei Reinhold und Schelling”, Archivio di filosofia, LXXIII, pp. 285-312.
Ahlers, R. Sein, Schein und Ursein bei Reinhold und einige Folgen, disponible en: www.academia.edu/7229006/Sein_Schein_und_Ursein_ bei_Reinhold_und_einige_Folgen, 2010. Acceso el 18 de junio de 2014.
Beiser, F. (1993) The Fate of Reason. German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press.
Bernet, R. (2003) “Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud”. En: Welton, D. (ed.) The New Husserl, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 199-222.
Bondelli, M. (1995) Das Anfangsproblem bei K. L. Reinhold: eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Philosophie Reinholds in der Zeit von 1789 bis 1803, Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Cassirer, E. (1994a) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, T. III: Die nachkantischen Systeme. Darmstad: WBG.
Cassirer, E. (1994b) Filosofía de la ilustración. México: F.C.E.
Di Giovanni, G. (ed.) (2010) Karl Leonhard Reinhold and the Enlightenment, Studies in German Idealism, Dordrecht: Springer.
Fabbianelli, F. (2010a) Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellung in Reinholds Elementar philosophie. En: Di Giovanni (2010), 197-207.
Fabbianelli, F. (2010b) “‘Antropologia’, ‘psicologia’ e ‘trascendentale’ nel pensiero di K. L. Reinhold e J.G. Fichte”, Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XII, Vol 2, 47-60.
Frank, M. (1991) Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis, Stuttgart, Reclam.
Hoyos, L. E. (2001) El escepticismo y la filosofía trascendental. Estudios sobre el pensamiento alemán a fines del siglo XVIII, Bogotá: Universidad Nacional, Siglo del Hombre.
Husserl, E. (1968) Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität.Texte aus dem Nachlass. Driter Teil (1928-1935), Husserliana, Edmund Husserl Gesammelte Werke, Vol. XV, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1976) Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, 1. Halband. Husserliana, Edmund Husserl Gesammelte Werke, Vol. III/1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1984a) Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Erster Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Husserliana XIX/1, The Hague, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1984b) Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Husserliana XIX/2, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1994) Ideas relativas una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica II, México, Fondo de Cultura Económico.
Husserl, E. (2006) Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929-1934). Die C-Manuskripte, New York, Springer.
Kant, I. (1993) Crítica de la razón pura. Traducción Pedro Ribas. Madrid, Alfaguara.
Lazzari, K. L. (2010) Reinhold und der Glaube der Vernunft. En: Di Giovanni 2010, 133-144
León, F. (2014) Dacióny reflexión. Una investigación fenomenológica. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional, será publicado en 2015.
Reinhold, K. L. (1789) Versuch einer Theorie des menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögen. Prag- Jena: Mauke.
Reinhold, K. L. (1790) Beyträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Missverständnisse der Philosophen. Erster Band: das Fundament der Elementarphilosophie betreffend, Vol. I, Jena: Mauke.
Reinhold, K. L. (1802) Beyträge zur leichtern Uebersicht des Zustandes der Philosophie beym Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts. Hefte 4, Hamburg.
Reinhold, K. L. (1978). Über das Fundament des philosophischen Wissens, Hamburg: Meiner, 1978 (1791).
Richir, M. (1998) “Qu’est-ce qu’un phénomène?”, Les Études philosophiques Le Phénoménal et sa tradition - octobre-décembre - P.U.F. – Paris No. 4, pp. 435-449.
Schuhmann, K. (1971) Die Fundamental betrachtungder Phänomenologie. Zum Weltproblem in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Zahavi, D. (2013) “Inner Time-Consciousness and Pre-reflective Self- awareness”. En: Welton, D. The New Husserl. A Critical Reader, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Julio César Vargas Bejarano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
