The formulation of the first principles in Physics I 7 in light of the notion of generation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n63a02Keywords:
principles, generation, matter, form, deprivationAbstract
In the present work we are interested in analyzing how Aristotle formulates the principles of physics from the notion of generation. Our thesis is that Physics I 7 is the “moment” of euporia that closes a process beginning in 1-2 with the problematization about the nature and number of the principles. To prove this, we will divide the work into two parts. In the first we will try to establish the argumentative context from which he postulates his principles. In the second part, we will analyze the assumptions on the basis of which it maintains that matter, form and deprivation are the three principles sought.
Downloads
References
Aguirre Santos, J. (2001). Aristóteles: Aporética como metodología. El caso de Metafísica B. Revista Laguna, 9, 37-52.
Aguirre Santos, J. (2015). Dialéctica y filosofía primera. Lectura de la Metafísica de Aristóteles. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Aristotele. (2008). Sulla generazione e la corruzione (G. I. Giardina, Introduzione, traduzione e note). ARACNE Editrice S. R. L.
Aristóteles. (1982). Tópicos. En Organon, vol. I (M. Candel Sanmartin, Trad. Introducción y notas) (pp. 89-306). Gredos.
Aristóteles. (1982). Categorías. En Organon, vol. I (M. Candel Sanmartin, Trad. Introducción y notas) (pp. 23-77). Gredos.
Aristóteles. (1983). Metafísica (T. Calvo Martínez, Trad. Introducción y notas). Gredos.
Aristóteles. (1987). Acerca de la generación y corrupción (E. La Croce, Trad. Introducción y notas). Gredos.
Aristóteles. (1993). Física (M. Boeri, Trad. Introducción y notas). Biblos.
Aristóteles. (1995). Física (G. Echandía, Trad. Introducción y notas). Gredos.
Aristóteles. (2011). Física (R. Radice, Trad. Introduzione e commento). Bompiani.
Aristóteles. (2013). Física (M. Zanatta, Trad. Introduzione e commento). Editrice Torinese.
Aristotle. (1999). Physique (A. Stevens, Trad. et commentaire). Vrin.
Aubenque, P. (2008). El problema del ser en Aristóteles (V. Peña, Trad.). Escolar y Mayor Editores. (Original publicado en 1962).
Bastit, M. (2002). Les quatre causes de l’être selon la philosophie première d’Aristote. Éditions Peeters.
Berti, E. (2004). Aristotele: dalla dialettica alla filosofia prima. Bompiani. (Original publicado en 1977).
Berti, E. (2008). Struttura e significato della Metafisica di Aristotele. EDUSC.
Boeri, M. (2006). Aristóteles contra Parménides: el problema del cambio y la posibilidad de una ciencia física. Tópicos, 30 bis, 45-68.
Bogen, J. (1992). Change and Contrariety in Aristotle. Phronesis, 37(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852892321052632
Bolton, R. (1990). The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic. In D. Devereux & P. Pellegrin (Eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote (pp. 185-236). Editions Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Bolton, R. (2003). Aristotle ́s Method in Natural Science: Physics I. In L. Judson (Ed.), Aristotle ́s Physics. A Collection of Essays (pp. 1-29). Clarendon Press.
Bostock, D. (1982). Aristotle on the Principles of Change in Physics. In I. M. Schofield & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Language and Logos (pp. 179-96). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550874.011
Bruce, L. & Robertson, L. A. (2002). Commentary on Book Alpha Elatton of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Animus, 7, 1-22.
Brunschwig, J. (1990). Remarques sur la communication de Robert Bolton. In D. Devereux, & P. Pellegrin (Eds), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote (pp. 237-262). Editions Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Carbonell, C. (2007). Movimiento y forma en Aristóteles. Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, S. A.
Carbonell, C. (2014). La forma como sujeto: ¿un desliz de Aristóteles? Eidos como sujeto y garante de la identidad. Estudios de Filosofía, 48, 49-72.
https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/18346
Cárdenas Mejía, L. G. (1998). ¿Dialoga Aristóteles con Parménides? Estudios de Filosofía, 17-18, 59-71. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/338009
Cassin, B. (1989). Parle si tu es un homme. En B. Cassin & M. Narcy (Eds), La décision du sens. Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d’ Aristote (pp. 9-60). Vrin.
Charlton, W. (2008). Aristotle’s Physics I- II, Introduction and commentary. Clarendon Press. (Original publicado en 1970).
Code, A. (2018). Physics I 6. En D. Quarantotto (Ed.), Aristotle’ Physics Book I. A systematic Explanation (pp. 154-177). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181853.008
Couloubaritsis, L. (1980). La Physique d’ Aristote. L’ avenement de la science Physique. Peeters.
Dancy, R. M. (1975). Sense and Contradiction. A Study in Aristotle. Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9770-3
Díaz, M. E. (2014). Alternativas para pensar la génesis. El mapa aristotélico de los que abordaron el problema de la generación. En G. Marcos & M. E. Díaz (Eds.), El filósofo y sus adversarios en los escritos de Platón y Aristóteles (pp. 135–151). Rhesis.
Giardina, G. I. (2002). Fondamenti della Fisica. Analisi critica di Aristotele, Phys. I. Symbolon.
Irwin, T. (1988). Aristotle’s Principles. Clarendon Press.
Judson, D. (2018). Physics I 5. En D. Quarantotto (Ed.), Aristotle’ Physics Book I. A systematic Explanation (pp. 130-153). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108181853.007
Kelsey, S. (2008). The Place of I 7 in the Argument of Physics I. Phronesis, 53, 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852808X278721
Mesquita, A. P. (2016). Platón y Aristóteles. Dos ontologías en confrontación. Estudios de Filosofía, 53, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n53a04
Mié, F. (2006). Persistencia y continuidad del sustrato material en la Física de Aristóteles. Tópicos, 30 bis, 69-100.
Mié, F. (2009). Dialéctica y ciencia en Aristóteles. Signos Filosóficos, 11(21), 9-42.
Quevedo, A. (1997). Aristóteles en torno a la privación y la causalidad. Anuario Filosófico, 30, 71-99.
Ross, W. D. (1936). Aristotle’s Physics. Introduction and commentary. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198141099.book.1
Rossi, G. (2001). Algunas notas sobre la discusión con los eléatas en Física I de Aristóteles. Tópicos, 20, 13 -159.
Rossi, G. (2017). Going through Aporiai: The Critical Use of Aristotle’s Dialectic. Oxford Studies, Ancient Philosophy, 52, 209 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805762.003.0006
Severino, E. (1995). I principi del divenire. Libro primo della Fisica. La scuola.
Simplicius. (1882). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca: in Physika (H. Diels, Ed.). De Gruyter.
Spangenberg, P. (2014). La figura de Protágoras en la prueba aristotélica contra el negador del principio de no-contradicción. En G. Marcos & M. E. Díaz (Eds.), El filósofo y sus adversarios en los escritos de Platón y Aristóteles (pp. 153–177). Rhesis.
Vigo, A. (2016). Filosofía y dialéctica en Aristóteles: un enfoque sinóptico. Hypnos, 36(1), 1-24.
Waterlow, S. (1982). Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A philosophical study.
Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246534.001.0001
Wright, M. R. (1981). Empedocles. The Extant Fragments. Introduction, commentary and concordance. Yale University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Claudia Marisa Seggiaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
