Information and knowledge in Relational Quantum Mechanics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.360861

Keywords:

Rovelli, Realism, Objetivity, Relation, Relativism, System

Abstract

The relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) has generated intense philosophical debate, particularly regarding its distinctive conception of knowledge. This paper examines how RQM articulates that conception through the notion of “information.” I begin by analyzing Carlo Rovelli’s view of scientific knowledge, followed by a reconstruction of the main argument supporting RQM. I then critically assess how the theory connects information and knowledge to present a realist, naturalist, and relational account of science. I argue that, in its current form, RQM fails to offer a coherent epistemological framework. Moreover, recent attempts by its advocates to resolve these issues expose deep philosophical tensions at the core of the interpretation, indicating the need for substantial theoretical revisions.

|Abstract
= 85 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 74 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Vila, UBA-UNTREF-CONICET

Juan Vila holds a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Buenos Aires, a Master's degree in Musical Creation, New Technologies, and Traditional Arts (IUNTREF), and a Diploma in Argentine Art – Folklore (UNSAM). He has specialized in areas such as phenomenology, philosophy of science, and environmental thought. He is a postdoctoral fellow at CONICET (Argentina), teaches philosophy and arts at UNTREF, and is the author of several philosophical articles published in national and international books and specialized journals. He is also the author of a book: The Paradox of Rationality (Teseo Press, 2015). For his work on the concept of the biological organism in Martin Heidegger, he was awarded the “Ted Kisiel Junior Scholar Award 2023” by the Heidegger Circle of North America in New York (2024).

References

Adlam, E. (2025). What Kind of Relationality does Quantum Mechanics Exhibit? arXiv: 2502.06991v1 [quant-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.06991

Aikin, S. (2006). “Pragmatism, Naturalism, and Phenomenology”. Human Studies, 29(3), 317-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-006-9026-5

Artmann, S. (2008). “Biological information”. In S. Sarkar & A. Plutynski (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (pp. 22-39). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696590.ch2

Barrett, J.A. (2005), The Preferred-Basis Problem and the Quantum Mechanics of Everything. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 56(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi114

Bitbol, M. (2007). Relations physiques ou relations fonctionnelles? Une lecture non-métaphysique de l’interprétation relationnelle de la mécanique quantique de Rovelli. En M. Bitbol, De l’intérieur du monde. Pour une philosophie et une science des relations (pp. 1-15). Flammarion.

Bitbol, M. (2024). Relations and relativities: A Kantian approach to relational interpretations of quantum theory. La Cultura, Rivista di filosofia e filologia, 3, 409-434. https://doi.org/10.1403/115370

Brukner, E. & Zeilinger, A. (2001). Conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum measurements. Physical Review A, 63, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022113

Bub, J. (2005). Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information. Foundations of Physics, 35(4), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-2010-x

Candiotto, L. (2017). The reality of relations. Giornale di Metafisica, 2, 537-551.

De Ronde, C. & Fernández Moujan, R. (2018). Epistemological vs. Ontological Relationalism in Quantum Mechanics: Relativism or Realism? In D. Aerts, M.L. Dalla Chiara, C. de Ronde and D. Krause (Eds.), Probing the Meaning and Structure of Quantum Mechanics: Information, Contextuality, Relationalism and Entanglement (pp.277-317). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276895_0015

Di Biagio, A., & Rovelli, C. (2021). Stable Facts, Relative Facts. Foundations of Physics, 51:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00429-w13

Di Biagio, A., & Rovelli, C. (2022). Relational Quantum Mechanics is About Facts, Not States: A Reply to Pienaar and Brukner. Foundations of Physics, 52(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00579-5

Dieks, D. (2009). Objectivity in Perspective: Relationism in the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Foundation of Physics, 39, pp. 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9293-x

Dorato, M. (2016). Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics, Monism and Quantum Becoming. In A. Marmodoro & A. Yates (Eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations (pp. 290–324). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0014

Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. MIT Press.

Dretske, F. (1983). Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information. The behavioral and brain sciences, 6, 55-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00014631

Einstein, E., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

Fuchs, C. A. (1962). Objective and subjective aspects of statistics in quantum description. In Körner, S. (Ed.), Observation and interpretation in the philosophy of physics proceedings of the ninth symposium of the Colston Research Society, Dover Publishing, pp. 197-203.

Ladyman, J. (1998). What is Structural Realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5

Lombardi, O. (2004). What is Information? Foundations of Science, 9(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025034.53313.7c

López, C. & Lombardi, O. (2015). Información Clásica e información cuántica. Scientiae Studia, 13(1), 143-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000100007

Markiewicz, M. & Żukowski, M. (2024). Relational Quantum Mechanics with Cross-Perspective Links Postulate: An Internally Inconsistent Scheme. arXiv: 2312.07056v2 [quant-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.13338

Millikan, R., (2006). Styles of Rationality. In S. Hurley & M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational Animals? (pp. 117-126). Oxford University Press.

Muciño, R., Okon, E., & Sudarski, D. (2015). Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics. arXiv: 2105.13338 [quant-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.13338

Pienaar, J. (2021a). A Quintet of Quandaries: Five No-Go Theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics. Foundation of Physics 51(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00500-6

Pienaar, J.L. (2021b). QBism and relational quantum mechanics compared. Foundations of Physics, 51(5), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00501-5

Riedel, T. (2024). Relational Quantum Mechanics, quantum relativism, and the iteration of relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 104, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.02.007

Robson, C. (2023). Relational Quantum Mechanics and Contextuality. arXiv: 2308.08922 [quant-ph]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-024-00788-0

Rouse, J. (2002). How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism, Chicago University Press.

Rovelli, C. (2015). Relative Information at the Foundation of Physics. In A. Aguirre, B. Foster, Z. Merali (Eds), It From Bit or Bit From It? (pp. 79-86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12946-4_7

Rovelli, C. (1996a). Relational Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637-1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302261

Rovelli, C. (2016b). Meaning: information + evolution. arXiv:1611.02420v1[physics.hist-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.02420

Rovelli, C. (2016c). A response to the Muciño-Okon-Sudarsky’s Assessment of Relational Quantum Mechanics. arXiv: 2106.03205 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.03205

Rovelli, C. (2018a). ‘Space Is Blue and Birds Fly through It’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376 (2123): 20170312. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0312

Rovelli, C. (2018b). Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. Foundation of Physics, 48, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0167-y

Rovelli, C. (2019). Neither Presentism nor Eternalism. Foundations of Physics, 49(12), 1325-1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-019-00312-9

Rovelli, C. (2021). Helgoland. Making sense of the quantum revolution, [trad. Segre, E. and Carnell S.] Riverhead Books.

Rovelli, C. & Adlam, E. (2022). Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics. arXiv: 2203.13342 [quant-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.13342

Rovelli, C. (2024). Princeton seminars on physics and philosophy. arXiv: 2407.01989 [physics.hist-ph]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.01989

Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is life. Cambridge University Press.

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press.

Van Fraassen, B. (2010). Rovelli’s world. Foundations of Physics, 40, 390-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9326-5

Vila, J. (2015), La paradoja de la racionalidad. Teseo Press.

Wood, D. (2010). Everything is relative: Has Rovelli found the way out of the woods? PHILM0005, Philosophy of Physics.

Published

13-08-2025

How to Cite

Vila, J. (2025). Information and knowledge in Relational Quantum Mechanics. Estudios De Filosofía. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.360861