The idea of argumentation at Lugano School. Approach and perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n56a05Keywords:
Argumentation, pragma-dialectics, model of topics, argumentative analysis, School of LuganoAbstract
Pragma-dialectical approach, due to its research agenda, has entered into fruitful dialogue with the theoretical perspective offered by theorists of Lugano School. In Spanish language there’s been a poor reference, or no reference at all, of this dialogue.
This paper wants to provide a first approach to the way the scholars of Lugano understand argumentation and to some instruments proposed by them for analysis and evaluation of arguments. It is expected, on the one hand, to spread the work of these scholars in hispanic-american ambit, and on the other hand to contribute to the discussion about pragma-dialectics in the theory of argumentation.
Downloads
References
Cigada, S. (2007). Nomi e cose. Aspetti semantici e pragmatici delle strutture nominali. Milano: I.S.U Universita Cattolica. Recuperado de http://www.unicatt.it/librario
Clark, H. (1996). Communities, commonalities, and communication. En J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Edits.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (págs. 324-355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de http://web.stanford.edu/~clark/pubs.html
Craig, R. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Communication theory, 119-161.
Giussani, L. (1991). Educar es un riesgo (Segunda ed.). Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro.
Greco Morasso, S. (Diciembre de 2008). Argumentative and other communicative strategies of the mediation practice. Lugano: Università della Svizzera italiana.
Griffin, E. (2012). A first look at communication theory (Eighth ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Tiempo y narración 1. Configuración del tiempo en el relato histórico. (Quinta, ed.). (A. Neira, Trad.) Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Rigotti, E. (1995). Veritá e persusione. il nuovo areopago, 14(1), 3-14.
Rigotti, E. (1997). Lezioni di linguistica generale. (A. Rocci, & S. Bignamini, Trads.) Milano: CUSL.
Rigotti, E. (2005). Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 75-96. Recuperado de http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14244896
Rigotti, E. (2006). Towards a typology of manipulative processes. En L. de Saussere, & P. Shulz (Edits.), Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind (págs. 61- 84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Rigotti, E. (2007). Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage. Argumentation, 20, 519-540.
Rigotti, E. (2009). Conoscenza e significato. Per una didattica responsabile (Prima ed.). (R. Mazzeo, Ed.) Milano: Mondadori.
Rigotti, E. (2009). Whether and how classical topics can be revived whitin contemporary argumentation theory. En F. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Edits.), Pondering on problems of argumentation - Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pág. 304). Springer.
Rigotti, E., & Cigada, S. (2004). La comunicazione verbale. Milano: Apogeo.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2005). Argumentum: e-course of argumentation theory for human and social sciences. LUGANO. Recuperado de http://www.argumentum.ch/
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (18 de Agosto de 2010). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. (Springer, Ed.) Argumentum, 24, 489-515.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (s.f.). Argumentum: e-course of argumentation theory for human and social sciences. LUGANO. Recuperado de http://www.argumentum.ch/
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A. (2006). Towards a definition of communication context. (U. of Lugano, Ed.) Studies in communication sciences, 6(2), 155-180.
Rigotti, E., & Wolfsgruber, C. (Edits.). (2011). Conoscenza e compimento di sé. Formazione interdisciplinare in Matematica, Scrittura, Storia. Dante. Milano: Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà.
Rigotti, E., Rocci, A., & Greco, S. (July de 2004). Intercultural communication: A linguistic and argumentative approach. Master in Intercultural Communication. Working Paper n. 5, 54. Lugano. Recuperado de http:/ /corsi.elearninglab.org
Van Eemeren, F. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (First ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Eemeren, F. (2012). Maniobras estratégicas en el discurso argumentativo (1 ed.). (C. Santibañez Yañez, & M. Molina, Trads.) Madrid - México: Plaza y Valdéz.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2013). Los actos de habla en las discusiones argumentativas (1 ed.). (M. Molina, C. Santibáñez Yáñez, & C. Fuentes, Trads.) Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales. Recuperado el 2014
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2011). Una teoria sistemática de la argumentación (1 ed.). (C. López, & A. Vicuña, Trads.) Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2011). Una teoría sistemática de la argumentación: la perspectiva pragamadialéctica (Primera ed.). (C. Lopez, & A. Vicuña, Trads.) Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E., Snoeck Henkemans, A., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. (2014). Handbook of or argumentation theory (First ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
Van Eeremen, Frans H; Grootendorst, Rob. (2002). Argumentación, comunicación y falacias. Una perspectiva pragmadialéctica. Santiago: Universidad Católica de Chile.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jorge Iván Hoyos Morales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
