The sense of mineness in personal memory: problems for the endorsement model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n64a08Keywords:
personal memory, sense of ownership, veridicality, non-believed memories, sense of minenessAbstract
What does it take for a subject to experience a personal memory as being her own? According to Fernández’ (2019) model of endorsement, this particular phenomenal quality of our memories, their “sense of mineness”, can be explained in terms of the experience of the mnemonic content as veridical. In this article, I criticize this model for two reasons: (a) the evidence that is used by Fernández to ground his theoretical proposal is dubious; and more importantly, (b) the endorsement model does not accommodate many non-pathological everyday memories that preserve their sense of mineness, but whose veridicality is explicitly denied, suspected, not automatically endorsed, or neither denied nor endorsed. Finally, I sketch two alternative explanations: one also problematic, the other one more promising, and present some normative advantages of the latter. This also displays the undesirability of the endorsement model from a normative perspective.
Downloads
References
Arango-Muñoz, S. (2013). Scaffolded memory and metacognitive feelings. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0124-1
Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2305-2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.003
Fernández, J. (2019). Memory: a self-referential account. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190073008.001.0001
Friedman, J. (2013). Suspended judgment. Philosophical studies, 162(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9753-y
Hyman, I. (2021, May). Can we erase false memories? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental-mishaps/202105/can-we-erase-false-memories
Gerrans, P. (2001). Authorship and ownership of thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 8(2), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2001.0009
Goldie, P. (2012). The mess inside: narrative, emotion and the mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230730.001.0001
Klein, S. B. & Nichols, S. (2012). Memory and the sense of personal identity. Mind, 121, 677-702. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzs080
Klein, S. B. (2013). Making the case that episodic recollection is attributable to operations occurring at retrieval rather than to content stored in a dedicated subsystem of long- term memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00003
Klein, S. B. (2014). Autonoesis and belief in a personal past: an evolutionary theory of episodic memory indices. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5(3), 427-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0181-8
Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1333
Mazzoni, G. A. L., Clark, A. & Nash, R. A. (2014). Disowned recollections: denying true experiences undermines belief in occurrence but not judgments of remembering. Acta Psychologica, 145, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.007
Mazzoni, G. A. L., Scoboria, A. & Harvey, L. (2010). Non-believed memories. Psychological Science, 21, 1334-1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379865
McCarroll (2018). Remembering from the outside. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190674267.003.0001
Mueller, R. O. & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Factor analysis and latent structure, confirmatory. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5239-5244). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00426-5
Oeberst, A., Wachendörfer, M. M., Imhoff, R. & Blank, H. (2021). Rich false memories of autobiographical events can be reversed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(13), e2026447118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026447118
Otgaar, H., Scoboria, A. & Mazzoni, G. A. L. (2014). On the existence and implications of nonbelieved memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414542102
Otgaar, H., Bucken, C., Bogaard, G., Wade, K. A., Hopwood, A. R., Scoboria, A. & Howe, M. L. (2019). Nonbelieved memories in the falsememory archive. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 429-438.
Rosenbaum, R. S., Köhler, S., Schacter, D. L., Moscovitch, M., Westmacott, R., Black, S. E. & Tulving, E. (2005). The case of KC: contributions of a memory-impaired person to memory theory. Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 989-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.007
Rubin, D. C, Schrauf, R. W. & Greenberg, D. L. (2003). Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 31, 887-901. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196443
Sacks, O. (2005). On memory. The Threepenny Review. https://www.threepennyreview.com/samples/sacks_w05.html
Salje, L. & Geddes, A. (forthcoming). Conscious experience: what’s in it for me? In M. García Carpintero & M. Guillot (Eds.), The Sense of Mineness. Oxford University Press.
Scoboria, A., Boucher, C. & Mazzoni, G. A. L. (2015). Reasons for withdrawing belief in vivid autobiographical memories. Memory, 23, 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.910530
Scoboria, A., Jackson, D. L., Talarico, J., Hanczakowski, M., Wysman, L. & Mazzoni, G. A. L. (2014). The role of belief in occurrence within autobiographical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1242–1258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034110
Scoboria, A., Mazzoni, G. A. L., Kirsch, I. & Relya, M. (2004). Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 791-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1062
Scoboria, A., Nash, R. A. & Mazzoni, G. A. L. (2016). Sub-types of nonbelieved memories reveal differential outcomes of challenges to memories. Memory, 25(7), 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437
Stuss, D. T. & Guzman, D. A. (1988). Severe remote memory loss with minimal anterograde amnesia: a clinical note. Brain and Cognition, 8(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(88)90036-X
Talland, G. A. (1964). Self-reference:a neglected component in remembering. American Psychologist, 19(5), 351-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039768
Trakas, M. (2019). On epistemic responsibility while remembering the past: the case of individual and historical memories. Les ateliers de l’éthique / The Ethics Forum, 14(2), 240-273. https://doi.org/10.7202/1071139ar
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Marina Trakas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
