Neonatal pediatric suffering: limits of the phenomenology of suffering?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.355671Keywords:
Neonatal suffering, Theories of suffering, Existential feelings, PhenomenologyAbstract
Neonatal suffering has been the focus of recent debates in pediatric bioethics and suffering theory. How can we access and conceptualize the suffering that can be attributed to newborns? How are we to discern the suffering of newborns who are non-neurotypical and may have short lives and severe neurocognitive disabilities, in addition to being entirely dependent on people or life-sustaining technologies? Phenomenology has provided valuable tools for analyzing the human experiences of suffering, but its application to neonatal suffering comes with fundamental challenges. In this paper, I consider recent contributions for elucidating the phenomenon of neonatal suffering, especially those in the field of non-experiential theories of suffering. Based on this review, a recent phenomenological approach to suffering is examined. Explicitly directed toward narrative persons, that approach appears to be inherently limited in elucidating the phenomenon of neonatal pediatric suffering. A suggestion is offered for partially elaborating the theoretical foundations of a phenomenological theory of neonatal suffering. This suggestion points towards a program for a phenomenology of the existential feelings of newborns.
Downloads
References
Anand, K. J.; Hickey, P. R. (1987). Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. The New England Journal of Medicine, 317(21), 1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198711193172105.
Brady, M. (2018). Suffering and Virtue. Oxford University Press.
Brancatisano, S. (2021). Suffering and end-of-life decision making. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 57(5), 766. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15461.
Campelia, G.; Kett, J; Wightman, A. (2020). Relational suffering and the moral authority of love and care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 41(4), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09530-z.
Carel, H.; Feder, G.; Gyorffy, G. (2019). Children and health. En A. Gheaus; G. Calder; J. Wispelaere (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children (pp. 373–383). Routledge.
Carel, H.; Kidd, I. (2020). Suffering and transformative experience. En D. Bain; M. Brady; J. Corns, J. (eds.), Philosophy of Suffering: Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity (pp. 165–179). Routledge.
Cassel E. (1991). The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Clément de Cléty, S.; Friedel, M.; Verhagen, A. A.; Lantos, J. D.; Carter, B. S. (2016). Please do whatever it takes to end our daughter’s suffering! Pediatrics, 137(1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3812.
Corns, J. (2021). Suffering as significantly disrupted agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 10 (3), 706–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12841.
de Weerd, W.; van Tol, D.; Albers, M.; Sauer, P.; Verkerk, M. (2015). Suffering in children: Opinions from parents and health-care professionals. European Journal of Pediatrics, 174(5), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-014-2440-1
Fitzgerald M. (2015). What do we really know about newborn infant pain? Experimental Physiology, 100(12), 1451–1457. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP085134.
Friedrich, A. B.; Dempsey, K. M.; Salter, E. (2019). The use of suffering in pediatric bioethics and clinical literature: a qualitative content analysis. Pediatric Ethicscope, 32(2). https://pediatricethicscope.org/article/the-use-of-suffering-in-pediatric-bioethics-and-clinical-literature-a-qualitative-content-analysis.
Green, J.; Darbyshire, P.; Adams, A.; Jackson, D. (2016). It’s agony for us as well: Neonatal nurses reflect on iatrogenic pain. Nursing Ethics, 23(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014558968.
Hanson S. S. (2016). Pediatric euthanasia and palliative care can work together. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 33(5), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909115570999.
Isaacs, D.; Preisz, A. (2021). Suffering and end-of-life decision-making. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 57(9), 1356–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15380.
Kauppinen, A. (2020). The world according to suffering. En D. Bain; M. Brady; J. Corns (eds.), Philosophy of Suffering: Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
Kious B. (2022). Three kinds of suffering and their relative moral significance. Bioethics, 36(6), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13021.
Kious B. (2023). Suffering and the dilemmas of pediatric care: a response to Tyler Tate. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 44(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-023-09615-5.
Klinke, M.; Fernandez, A. (2022). Taking phenomenology beyond the first-person perspective: conceptual grounding in the collection and analysis of observational evidence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22 (1), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09796-1.
Lagercrantz, H.; Changeux, J. P. (2009). The emergence of human consciousness: from fetal to neonatal life. Pediatric Research, 65(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181973b0d.
Leder, D. (1990). The Absent Body. University of Chicago Press.
Massie J. (2021). Suffering and the end of life. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 57(7), 979–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15566.
Mayerfeld, J. (1999). Suffering and Moral Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
McClelland, T. (2020). The disruption model of suffering. En D. Bain; M. Brady; J. Corns (eds.), Philosophy of Suffering: Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity (pp. 37-54). Routledge.
Phillips, W. R.; Uygur, J. M.; Egnew, T. R. (2023). A comprehensive clinical model of suffering. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 36(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220308R1.
Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being. Phenomenology, Psychiatry, and the Sense of Reality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199206469.001.0001
Ratcliffe, M. (2015). Experiences of Depression. A Study in Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (2020). Existential feelings. En T. Szanto; H. Landweer, (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotion (pp. 250-261). Routledge.
Ratcliffe, M. (2023). The underlying unity of hope and trust. The Monist, 106, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onac018.
Ratcliffe, M. (unpublished). Scaffolding regulation and the social world: A perspective on human emotional experience. Available at https://www.academia.edu/92412177/.
Ratcliffe, M.; Broome, M. (2022). Beyond “salience” and “affordance”: Understanding anomalous experiences of significant possibilities (50–69). En S. Archer (ed.). Salience. Routledge.
Ratcliffe, M.; Ruddell, M.; Smith, B. (2014). What is a “sense of foreshortened future?” A phenomenological study of trauma, trust, and time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01026.
Reis, R. (2020). Fenomenologia hermenêutica e psicologia experimental do desenvolvimento. Ekstasis. Revista de Hermenêutica e Fenomenologia, 9(20), 149-194. https://doi.org/10.12957/ek.2020.51551.
Rochat, P. (2011). What is it like to be a newborn? En S. Gallagher (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Self (pp. 57–79). Oxford University Press.
Salter, E. K. (2020). The new futility? The rhetoric and role of “suffering” in pediatric decision-making. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019840745.
Svenaeus, F. (2014). The phenomenology of suffering in medicine and bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 35(6), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-014-9315-3.
Svenaeus, F. (2018). Phenomenological Bioethics: Medical Technologies, Human Suffering, and the Meaning of Being Alive. Routledge.
Svenaeus, F. (2020). To die well: The phenomenology of suffering and end of life ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 23(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09914-6.
Svenaeus F. (2022). Health and illness as enacted phenomena. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 41(2), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09747-0.
Tate T. (2020a). Pediatric suffering and the burden of proof. Pediatrics, 146(1), S70–S74. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0818N.
Tate T. (2020b). Philosophical investigations into the essence of pediatric suffering. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 41(4), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09531-y.
Tate, Tyler (2020c). What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 41(4), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8.
Tate, T.; Pearlman, R. (2019). What we mean when we talk about suffering—and why Eric Cassell should not have the last word. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 62(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2019.0005.
Tobin, B. (2021). Suffering and end-of-life decision-making. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 57(9), 1360–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15437.
van Hooft, S. (1998). Suffering and the goals of medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1(2), 25–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009923104175.
van Manen, M. (2019). Phenomenology of the Newborn: Life from Womb to World. Routledge.
Vincini, S.; Gallagher, S. (2021). Developmental phenomenology: Examples from social cognition. Continental Philosophy Review, 54, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09510-z.
Verhagen, E.; Sauer, P. J. (2005). The Groningen Protocol—Euthanasia in severely ill newborns. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352(10), 959–962. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp058026.
Walsh, J. (2022). Into that darkness: A Heideggerian phenomenology of pain and suffering. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 53(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-20221399
Zayegh A. M. (2022). Addressing suffering in infants and young children using the concept of suffering pluralism. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 19(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10161-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Róbson Ramos dos Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
