Legislative Institutionalization: Historical Origins and Analytical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.15790Keywords:
Legislative Institutionalization, Legislature, Legislative Development, Political InstitutionsAbstract
This article revises the theory of legislative institutionalization, which emerged in political science to analyze historical trends in the U.S. Congress. It singles out Polsby’s “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House” as the starting point of this theory and maintains that this theory takes aim at understanding the historical development of legislatures, besides highlighting issues of governance, authority building, and differentiation from the environment. After reviewing the observations and criticisms raised by the theory, this article provides an analytical framework to study the institutionalization of national, democratic legislatures, based upon a traditional process-oriented concept of legislative institutionalization. This framework draws from theoretical contributions made by institutional sociologists and both presidential and legislative researchers, all of which are brought together to understand the process that presides over the institutionalization of a legislature. Finally, this article suggests the existence of a link among the dimensions of the institutionalization process, the institutional design of a legislature, and the exchanges between the legislature and the environment.
Downloads
References
(1) Ann-Lee, Patricia. (1996). England: An Unfinished Revolution. In: Mary Ellen Fischer, (Ed.). Establishing Democracies (pp. 22-55). Boulder: Westview Press.
(2) Brady, David. W. (2001). Institutionalization. In: Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, (pp. 7.558-7.561). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
(3) Chaffey, Douglas C. (1970). The Institutionalization of State Legislatures: A Comparative Study. The Western Political Quarterly, 23 (1), pp. 180-196.
(4) Close, David, (Ed.). (1995). Legislatures and the New Democracies in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
(5) Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David. (1981). Toward a Diachronic Analysis of Congress. The American Political Science Review, 75 (4), pp. 988-1.006.
(6) Dometrius, Nelson C. and Lee Sigelman. (1991). Costs, Benefits, and Careers in the U.S. House of Representatives: A Developmental Approach. Congress and the Presidency, 18 (1), pp. 55-75.
(7) Eckstein, Harry. (1998). Lesson for the ‘Third Wave’ from the First: An Essay on Democratization. In: Eckstein, Harry; Fleron Jr., Frederic J.; Hoffmann, Erik P. and Reisinger, William M. (Eds.). Can Democracy Take Root in Post-Soviet Russia: Explorations in State-Society Relations (pp. 249-285). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
(8) Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1964). Institutionalization and Change. American Sociological Review, 29 (2), pp. 235-247.
(9) Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1968). Social Institutions. In: Sills, David L. (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 14, (pp. 409-421). New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press.
(10) Fiorina, Morris P. (1992). Divided Government. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
(11) Fiorina, Morris P., Rohde, David W. and Wissel, Peter. (1975). Historical Change in House Turnover. In: Ornstein, Norman J. (Ed.). Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform (pp. 24-57). New York: Praeger Publishers.
(12) Fish, Steven M. (2006). Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17 (1), pp. 5-20.
(13) Forrest, Joshua B. (1994). Asynchronic Comparisons. Weak States in Post-colonial Africa and Medieval Europe. In: Dogan, Mattei and Kazancigil, Ali (Eds.). Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance (pp. 260-296). Oxford: Blackwell.
(14) Haeberle, Steven H. (1978). The Institutionalization of the Subcommittee in the United States House of Representatives. Journal of Politics, 40 (4), pp. 1.054-1.065.
(15) Hibbing, John R. and Patterson, Samuel C. (1994). The Emergence of Democratic Parliaments in Eastern and Central Europe. In: Copeland, Gary W. and Patterson, Samuel C. (Eds.). Parliaments in the Modern World (pp. 129-149). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
(16) Hibbing, John R. (1999). Legislative Careers: Why and How We Should Study Them. Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXIV (2), pp. 149-171.
(17) Hibbing, John R. (1988). Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science, 32 (3), 681-712.
(18) Huntington, Samuel P. (1973). Congressional Responses to the Twentieth Century. In: Truman, David (Ed.). The Legislature and America’s Future (pp. 6-38). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc. for The American Assembly.
(19) Huntington, Samuel P. (1965). Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics, 17 (3), pp. 383-430.
(20) Jepperson, Ronal J. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In: Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(21) Judge, David. (2003). Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow? Government and Opposition, 38 (4), pp. 497-516.
(22) Kornberg, Allan. (1970). Parliament in Canadian Society. In: Kornberg, Allan and Musolf, Lloyd D. (Eds.). Legislatures in Developmental Perspective (pp. 55-129). Durham: Duke University Press.
(23) Loewenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel C. (1979). Comparing Legislatures: An Analytic Study. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
(24) Mainwaring, Scott and Hagopian, Frances. (2005). Introduction: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. In: Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott P. (Eds.). The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks (pp. 1-13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(25) March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78 (3), pp. 734-749.
(26) North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(27) Obando Camino, Iván Mauricio. (2009). Legislative Institutionalization in Chile, 1834-1924. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York at Albany.
(28) Opello, Jr., Walter C. (1986). Portugal’s Parliament: An Organizational Analysis of Legislative Performance. Legislative Studies Quarterly, XI (3), pp. 291-319.
(29) Palanza, Valeria, Scartascini, Carlos and Tommasi, Mariano. (2012). On the Institutionalization of Congress(es) in Latin America and Beyond. Washington D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank, IDB Working Paper Series N° IDB-WP-363.
(30) Patterson, Samuel C. and Copeland, Gary W. (1994). Parliaments in the Twenty-first Century. In: Copeland, Gary W. and Patterson, Samuel C. (Eds.). Parliaments in the Modern World (pp. 1-11). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
(31) Patterson, Samuel C. (1981). Understanding Congress in the Long Run: A Comment on Joseph Cooper and David Brady, ‘Toward a Diachronic Theory of Congress’. American Political Science Review, 75 (4), pp. 1.007-1.009.
(32) Peters, B. Guy. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London: Pinter.
(33) Polsby, Nelson W., Gallagher, Miriam and Spencer Rundquist, Barry. (1969). The Growth of the Seniority System in the U. S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 63 (3), pp. 787-807.
(34) Polsby, Nelson W. (1975). Legislatures. In: Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (Eds.). Handbook of Political Science, 5, (pp. 257-319). Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
(35) Polsby, Nelson W. (1981). Studying Congress through Time: A Comment on Joseph Cooper and David Brady, ‘Toward a Diachronic Analysis of Congress.’ American Political Science Review, 75 (4), pp. 1.010-1.012.
(36) Polsby, Nelson W. (1968). The Institutionalization of the U.S. House. The American Political Science Review, 62 (1), 144-168.
(37) Przeworski, Adam. (1993). Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts. In: Jon Elster and Slagstad, Rubne (Eds.). Constitutionalism and Democracy (pp. 59-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(38) Ragsdale, Lynn and Theis, John J. (1997). The Institutionalization of the American Presidency, 1924-1992. American Journal of Politics, 41 (4), pp. 1.280-1.318.
(39) Rosenthal, Alan. (1996). State Legislative Development: Observations from Three Perspectives. Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXI (2), pp. 169-198.
(40) Saivetz, Carol R. (1996). Russia: Problems and Prospects for Democratization. In: Fischer, Mary Ellen (Ed.), Establishing Democracies (pp. 253-279). Boulder: Westview Press.
(41) Schmitter, Philippe and Karl, Terry Lyn. (1993). What Democracy is… and Is Not. In: Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc (Eds.). The Global Resurgence of Democracy (pp. 39-52). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
(42) Sisson, Richard. (1974). Comparative Legislative Institutionalization: A Theoretical Exploration. In: Kornberg, Allan (Ed.). Legislatures in Comparative Perspective (pp. 17-38). New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
(43) Solt, Frederick. (2004). Electoral Competition, Legislative Pluralism, and Institutional Development: Evidence from Mexico’s States. Latin American Research Review, 39 (1), pp. 155-167.
(44) Squire, Peverill. (1992). The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly. The Journal of Politics, 54 (4), pp. 1.026-1.054.
(45) Witmer, Richard. (1964). The Aging of the House. Political Science Quarterly, 79, pp. 526-541.
(46) Ziblatt, Daniel. (2006). How Did Europe Democratize? World Politics, 58, pp. 311-318.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios Políticos authorizes the copy of articles and texts for academic purposes or the internal use of institutions as long as the proper citation of the source is provided. Total or partial reproduction of the journal with different purposes should have an explicit authorization by the Institute of Politic Studies of the University of Antioquia.
The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessary reflect or bind those of the Institute of Political Studies of the University of Antioquia.
