El rol ciudadano en la nueva y posnueva gestión pública. Un análisis a partir de los enfoques y características
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n73a07Palabras clave:
Administración Pública, Nueva Gestión Pública, Posnueva Gestión Pública, Rol Ciudadano, Gobierno, EstadoResumen
Este artículo tiene como propósito realizar una reflexión teórica sobre la gestión pública actual a partir de los paradigmas que han permeado la administración pública a lo largo de la historia. Para tal fin se indaga ¿cuál es el papel del ciudadano desde y para los paradigmas de la nueva gestión pública (NGP) y la posnueva gestión pública (P-NGP)? Para ello se emplea un enfoque cualitativo de alcance descriptivo. Específicamente, se acude al análisis de contenido como una metodología basada en el análisis e interpretación de fuentes documentales. Se identifican tres conclusiones: i) cambio en la comprensión del rol ciudadano, pasando de ser reactivo-espectador en la NGP a uno activo-participativo en la P-NGP; ii) modos de interacción como factores clave que marcan la transición hacia el concepto de P-NGP; y iii) acuerdos de gobernanza combinados, es decir, de arriba hacia abajo y de abajo hacia arriba.
Descargas
Citas
(1) Alford, John & O’Flynn, Janine. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (3-4), pp. 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732731
(2) Ali, Amanat; Iqbal, Shadid; Haider, Syed Arslan; Tehseen, Shehnaz; Anwar, Bilal; Sohail, Mariam & Rehman, Khalid. (2021). Does Governance in Information Technology Matter When It Comes to Organizational Performance in Pakistani Public Sector Organizations? Mediating Effect of Innovation. SAGE Open, 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016557
(3) Andrews, Leighton. (2019). Public Administration, Public Leadership and the Construction of Public Value in the Age of the Algorithm and ‘Big Data’. Public Administration, 97 (2), pp. 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12534
(4) Attard, Judie; Orlandi, Fabrizio; Scerri, Simon & Auer, Sören. (2015). A Systematic Review of Open Government Data Initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (4), pp. 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
(5) Barzelay, Michael. (2003). The New Public Management: a bibliographical essay for Latin American (and other) scholars. International Public Management Journal, 3 (2), pp. 229-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00038-6
(6) Bloch, Carter. (2011). Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries (MEPIN). Nordic Innovation Centre. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707193/FULLTEXT01.pdf
(7) Boyne, George. (2002). Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39 (1), pp. 97-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284
(8) Bozeman, Barry. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Georgetown University. https://doi.org/10.1353/book13027
(9) Brinkerhoff, Derick & Brinkerhoff, Jennifer. (2015). Public Sector Management Reform in Developing Countries: Perspectives Beyond NPM Orthodoxy. Public Administration and Development, 35 (4), pp. 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1739
(10) Bryson, John M.; Crosby, Barbara C. & Bloomberg, Laura. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74 (4), pp. 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
(11) Buyannemekh, Battulga; Gasco-Hernández, Mila & Gil-García, J. Ramón. (2024). Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City Development. Sustainability, 16, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051750
(12) Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (CLAD). (1999). Una nueva gestión pública para América Latina. Economía y Sociedad, 9, pp. 5-20. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.1999.175.49119
(13) Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (CLAD). (8 de octubre de 2020). Carta iberoamericana de innovación en la gestión pública. XIX Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministras y Ministros de la Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado. Andorra.
(14) Christensen, Tom & Fan, Yongmao. (2018). Post-New Public Management: A New Administrative Paradigm for China? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84 (2), pp. 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316633513
(15) Christensen, Tom & Lægreid, Per. (2007). The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review, 67 (6), pp. 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
(16) Chica-Vélez, Sergio Alberto y Salazar-Ortiz, Cristian Andrés. (2016). Nueva y posnueva gestión pública ¿Continuidad o ruptura de las doctrinas de reforma a partir de 1990? Administración y Desarrollo, 46 (1). https://doi.org/10.22431/25005227.89
(17) Chica-Vélez, Sergio Alberto y Salazar-Ortiz, Cristian Andrés. (2020). Posnueva gestión pública, gobernanza e innovación. Tres conceptos en torno a una forma de organización y gestión de lo público. Opera, 28, pp. 17-51. https://doi.org/10.18601/16578651.n28.02
(18) Cortés-Cediel, María; Cantador, Iván & Rodríguez-Bolívar, Manuel. Pedro. (2021). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39 (4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478
(19) Criado, J. Ignacio; Ferreira Dias, Thiago; Sano, Hironobu; Rojas-Martín, Francisco; Silvan, Aitor & Filho, Antônio Isidro. (2021). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. International Journal of Public Administration, 44 (6), pp. 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181
(20) Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara. (2016). Governing Smart Cities: An Empirical Analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 34 (6), pp. 693-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611093
(21) De Vries, Hanna; Bekkers, Victor & Tummers, Lars. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94 (1), pp. 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
(22) De Vries, Michiel & Nemec, Juraj. (2013). Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26 (1), pp. 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293408
(23) Deckert, Mark; Stern, Abram & Sack, Warren. (2011). Peer to PCAST: What does Open Video have to do with Open Government? Information Polity, 16 (3), pp. 225-241. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0239
(24) Dent, Mike. (2005). Post-New Public Management in Public Sector Hospitals? The UK, Germany and Italy. Policy and Politics, 33 (4), pp. 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557305774329208
(25) DiGaetano, Alan & Strom, Elizabeth. (2003). Comparative Urban Governance: An Integrated Approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38 (3), pp. 356-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087402238806
(26) Donadelli, Flavia; Cunha, Bruno Q & Dussauge-Laguna, Mauricio I. (2020). ‘Post-NPM’ by Force or Fiat? A Comparison of Administrative Reform Trajectories in Brazil and Mexico. Public Administration and Development, 40 (5), pp. 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1897
(27) Downe-Wamboldt, Barbara. (1992). Content Analysis: Method, Applications, and Issues. Health Care for Women International, 13 (3), pp. 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
(28) Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon & Tinkler, Jane. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (3), pp. 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
(29) Free, Clinton & Radcliffe, Vaughan. (2009). Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 84 (2), pp. 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9681-8
(30) Gao, Yingying; Janssen, Marijn & Zhang, Congcong. (2023). Understanding the Evolution of Open Government Data Research: Towards Open Data Sustainability and Smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89 (1), pp. 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211009955
(31) García García, Jesús. (2014). Gobierno abierto: transparencia, participación y colaboración en las Administraciones Públicas. Innovar, 24 (54), pp. 75-88. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46441
(32) Gibbert, Michael & Ruigrok, Winfred. (2010). The “What” and “How” of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work. Organizational Research Methods, 13 (4), pp. 710-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351319
(33) Gil-García, J. Ramón; Gasco-Hernández, Mila & Pardo, Theresa. (2023). Making Sense of Open Government: A Conceptual Framework and Ideas for Future Research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6 (2-3), pp. 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvad005
(34) Gomes de Sousa, Weslei; Pereira de Melo, Elis; de Souza Bermejo, Paulo; Sousa Farias, Rafael & Oliveira, Adalmir. (2019). How and Where is Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector Going? A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36 (4), pp. 101-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
(35) Guerrero, Omar. (2003). Nueva gerencia pública: ¿Gobierno sin política? Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 8 (23), pp. 379-395. https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v8i23.9599
(36) Guerrero, Omar. (2019). Neoliberalismo y Neogerencia. REAd, 25 (2), pp. 4-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.246.90269
(37) Hansson, Karin; Belkacem, Kheira & Ekenberg, Love. (2015). Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, 33 (5), pp. 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560847
(38) Harrison, Teresa; Guerrero, Santiago; Burke, Brian; Cook, Meghan; Cresswell, Anthony;Helbig, Natalie; Hrdinová, Jana & Pardo, Theresa. (2011). Open Government and E-Government: Democratic Challenges from a Public Value Perspective. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037597
(39) Hollands, Robert. (2015). Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8 (1), pp. 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
(40) Hood, Christopher. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
(41) Hood, Christopher. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2-3), pp. 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
(42) Ivars-Baidal, Josep; Vera-Rebollo, Fernando, Perles-Ribes, José; Femenia-Serra, Francisco & Celdrán-Bernabeu, Marco. (2021). Sustainable Tourism Indicators: What’s New within the Smart City/Destination Approach?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31 (7), 1556-1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1876075
(43) Jiang, Huaxiong; Geertman, Stan & Witte, Patrick. (2022). Smart Urban Governance: An Alternative to Technocratic “Smartness.” GeoJournal, 87 (3), pp. 1639-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
(44) Jurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando y Valencia Upegui, Sandra. María. (2021). Gestión del conocimiento: caso de una entidad del sector público colombiano. Tendencias, 22 (2), pp. 130-156. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.212202.171
(45) Kitchin, Rob. (2015). Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8 (1), pp. 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027
(46) Krivý, Maroš. (2016). Towards a Critique of Cybernetic Urbanism: The Smart City and the Society of Control. Planning Theory, 17 (1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631
(47) Lewis, Jenny; Ricard, Lykke Margot & Klijn, Erik Hans. (2018). How Innovation Drivers, Networking and Leadership Shape Public Sector Innovation Capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84 (2), pp. 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
(48) Locke, Karen; Feldman, Martha & Golden-Biddle, Karen. (2022). Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data. Organizational Research Methods, 25 (2), pp. 262-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600
(49) Maestre, Leydis; Páez Cabas, Andrea; Lombana Coy, Jahir y Vega Jurado, Jaider. (2021). Innovación social: un análisis bibliométrico del concepto y sus tendencias actuales. Revista Universidad y Empresa, 23 (41), pp. 266-292. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.8964
(50) Mariñez, Freddy. (2015). Innovación pública. Para que funcionarios públicos y ciudadanos actúen con saberes cívicos. Fontamara.
(51) McCourt, Willy. (2013). Models of Public Service Reform: A Problem-Solving Approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6428. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2258956
(52) McFarlane, Colin & Söderström, Ola. (2017). On Alternative Smart Cities. From a Technology-Intensive to a Knowledge-Intensive Smart Urbanism. City Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 21 (3-4), pp. 312-328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166
(53) Meijer, Albert J.; Curtin, Deirdre & Hillebrandt, Maarten. (2012). Open Government: Connecting Vision and Voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78 (1), pp. 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
(54) Meijer, Albert; Gil-García, Ramón & Rodríguez-Bolívar, Manuel Pedro. (2016). Smart City Research: Contextual Conditions, Governance Models, and Public Value Assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34 (6), pp. 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315618890
(55) Meijer, Albert & Rodríguez-Bolívar, Manuel Pedro. (2016). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2), pp. 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
(56) Meijer, Albert & Thaens, Marcel. (2021). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. Public Performance and Management Review, 44 (1), pp. 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954
(57) Metcalfe, Les. (1993). Public Management: From Imitation to Innovation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 52 (3), pp. 292-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1993.tb00281.x
(58) Meynhardt, Timo. (2009). Public Value Inside: What is Public Value Creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (3-4), pp. 192-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632
(59) Meynhardt, Timo. (2015). Public Value Turning a Conceptual Framework. In: Bryson, John M.; Crosby, Barbara C. & Bloomberg, Laura (Eds.). Public Value and Public Administration (pp. 147-169). Georgetown University.
(60) Meynhardt, Timo & Jasinenko, Anna. (2020). Measuring Public Value: Scale Development and Construct Validation. International Public Management Journal, 24 (2), pp. 222-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1829763
(61) Moore, Mark. (1995). Creating Public Value Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University.
(62) Moore, Mark & Khagram, Sanjeev. (2004). On Creating Public Value. What Business might Learn from Government about Strategic Management. Harvard University.
(63) Mora, Luca; Gerli, Paolo; Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni, Antonio. (2023). Smart City Governance from an Innovation Management Perspective: Theoretical Framing, Review of Current Practices, and Future Research Agenda. Technovation, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
(64) Morrow, Susan & Smith, Michael Lee. (2000). Qualitative Research for Counseling Psychology. In: Brown, Steven D. & Lent, Robert W. (Eds.). Handbook of Counseling Psychology (pp. 199-230). John Wiley & Sons.
(65) Nam, Taewoo. (2012). Citizens’ Attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78 (2), pp. 346-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312438783
(66) Neumann, Oliver; Matt, Christian; Hitz-Gamper, Benedikt Simon; Schmidthuber, Lisa & Stürmer, Matthias. (2019). Joining Forces for Public Value Creation? Exploring Collaborative Innovation in Smart City Initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 36 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101411
(67) Oliver, Joan Guix. (2008). El análisis de contenidos: ¿qué nos están diciendo? Revista de Calidad Asistencial, 23 (1), pp. 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1134-282X(08)70464-0
(68) Osborne, David & Gaebler, Ted. (1992). Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison Wesley.
(69) Osborne, David y Gaebler, Ted. (2002). La reinvención del gobierno. Paidós.
(70) Osborne, Stephen (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8 (3), pp. 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
(71) Page, Stephen; Stone, Melissa; Bryson, John & Crosby, Barbara. (2015). Public Value Creation by Cross-Sector Collaborations: A Framework and Challenges of Assessment. Public Administration, 93 (3), pp. 715-732. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12161
(72) Papi, Luca; Bigoni, Michele;Bracci, Enrico & Deidda Gagliardo, E. (2018). Measuring Public Value: A Conceptual and Applied Contribution to the Debate. Public Money and Management, 38 (7), pp. 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1439154
(73) Pardo, Theresa; Gil-García, J. Ramón; Gascó-Hernández, Mila; Cook, Meghan & Choi, Iseul. (2021). Creating Public Value in Cities: A Call for Focus on Context and Capability. In: Estevez, Elsa; Pardo, Theresa A.; Jochen Scholl, Hans (Eds.). Smart Cities and Smart Governance. Towards the 22nd Century Sustainable City (pp. 119-139). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61033-3_6
(74) Pereira, Gabriela; Parycek, Peter; Falco, Enzo & Kleinhans, Reinount. (2018). Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review. Information Polity, 23 (2), pp. 143-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067
(75) Peters, B. Guy y Murillo, Lorena (2005). Gobernanza y burocracia pública: ¿nuevas formas de democracia o nuevas formas de control? Foro Internacional, 4 (182), pp. 585-598.
(76) Pierre, Jon. (1999). Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34 (3), pp. 372-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
(77) Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University.
(78) Przeybilovicz, Erico; Cunha, Maria Alejandra; Geertman, Stan; Leleux, Charles; Michels, Ank; Tomor, Zsuzsanna; Webster, William & Meijer, Albert. (2022). Citizen Participation in the Smart City: Findings from an International Comparative Study. Local Government Studies, 48 (1), pp. 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204
(79) Ramírez-Alujas, Álvaro. (2023). Gobierno Abierto en Iberoamérica. El camino recorrido para promover y consolidar la apertura institucional en la región (2011-2021). Estado, Gobierno y Gestión Pública, 20 (38), pp. 5-10. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8980.2022.70341
(80) Ranchod, Rushil. (2020). The Data-Technology Nexus in South African Secondary Cities: The Challenges to Smart Governance. Urban Studies, 57 (16), pp. 3281-3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019896974
(81) Robinson, Mark. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service.Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Global Centre for Public Service Excellence. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/PS-Reform_Paper.pdf
(82) Ruhlandt, Robert Wilhelm. (2018). The Governance of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Cities, 81, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
(83) Shelton, Taylor; Zook, Matthew & Wiig, Alna. (2015). The “Actually Existing Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 8 (1), pp. 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026
(84) Sørensen, Eva & Torfing, Jacob. (2011). Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Administration and Society, 43 (8), pp. 842-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
(85) Sørensen, Eva & Vabo, Signy Irene. (2020). A Public Innovation Perspective on Change in Local Democracy. Innovation Journal, 25 (1), pp. 1-19.
(86) Steele, Jennifer; Murnane, Richard & Willett, John. (2010). Do Financial Incentives Help Low-Performing Schools Attract and Keep Academically Talented Teachers? Evidence. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29 (3), pp. 451-478. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20505
(87) Stoker, Gerry. (2006). Public Value Management. A New Narrative for Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), pp. 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
(88) Tomor, Zsuzsanna; Przeybilovicz, Erico & Leleux, Charles. (2021). Smart Governance in Institutional Context: An In-Depth Analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba. Cities, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103195
(89) Torfing, Jacob. (2019). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument. Public Management Review, 21 (1), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
(90) Trencher, Gregory. (2019). Towards the Smart City 2.0: Empirical Evidence of Using Smartness as a Tool for Tackling Social Challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, pp. 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033
(91) Vanolo, Alberto. (2014). Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 51 (5), pp. 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427
(92) Viale-Pereira, Gabriela; Cunha, Maria Alexandra; Lampoltshammer, Thomas; Parycek, Peter & Testa, Maurício Gregianin. (2017). Increasing Collaboration and Participation in Smart City Governance: A Cross-Case Analysis of Smart City Initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23 (3), pp. 526-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
(93) Viezzer-Baretta, Julia; Gaia-Hoffmann, Micheline; Militao, Luciana & Silva-Farias, Josivania. (2024). Coproduction, Public Sector Innovation and Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17 (3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2023-0107
(94) Walker, Richard (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84 (2), pp. 311-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x
(95) Wirtz, Bernd; Becker, Marcel & Weyerer, Jan. (2023). Open Government: Development, Concept, and Future Research Directions. International Journal of Public Administration, 46 (12), pp. 797-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2019273
(96) Wirtz, Bernd & Birkmeyer, Steven. (2015). Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38 (5), pp. 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735
(97) Yuan, Qianli & Gasco-Hernández, Mila. (2021). Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Creating Public Value through Civic Hackathons. Public Management Review, 23 (4), pp. 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1695884
(98) Zhao, Fang; Fashola, Olushola; Olarewaju, Tolulope & Onwumere, Ijeoma. (2021). Smart City Research: A Holistic and State-of-the-Art Literature Review. Cities, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103406
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Diego Armando Jurado Zambrano, Gleidy Alexandra Urrego Estrada
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Estudios Políticos autoriza la copia de artículos y textos únicamente con fines académicos, bajo la condición ineludible de citar la fuente. Para la reproducción total o parcial de la Revista con otros fines, se debe contar con la autorización explícita del Instituto de Estudios Políticos de la Universidad de Antioquia, previa consulta al correo electrónico revistaepoliticos@udea.edu.co
Los autores son los titulares de los derechos morales de sus artículos y pueden archivar y divulgar citando la fuente. Estudios Políticos asume los derechos de reproducción.
El material creado por usted puede ser distribuido, copiado y exhibido por terceros si se muestra en los créditos. No se puede obtener ningún beneficio comercial y las obras derivadas tienen que estar bajo los mismos términos de licencia que el trabajo original.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
