Gobernabilidad y gobernanza: una revisión cienciométrica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n74a14Palabras clave:
Gobernabilidad, Gobernanza, Análisis Cienciométrico, Biblioshiny, Árbol de la CienciaResumen
Este artículo examina la evolución conceptual de la gobernabilidad y la gobernanza a través de un análisis cienciométrico de 1921 publicaciones indexadas en las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science entre 2000 y 2023. Mediante técnicas como el algoritmo Tree of Science (ToS) y herramientas computacionales (R con Bibliometrix para análisis bibliométrico y Python para preprocesamiento), se identificaron tres fases de desarrollo en la producción científica: crecimiento inicial (2000-2008), expansión acelerada (2009-2021) y estabilización reciente (2022-2023). Los resultados, visualizados mediante redes de coautoría y citación, evidencian un claro predominio de estudios anglosajones —especialmente de Estados Unidos y los Países Bajos— y de revistas como Marine Policy. Asimismo, se identifican tensiones entre enfoques de gobernanza colaborativa y modelos estatocéntricos, particularmente en estudios sectoriales sobre sistemas pesqueros (rama 1 del ToS). Un hallazgo relevante es la subrepresentación de la literatura latinoamericana en los núcleos centrales de citación y producción académica, lo que plantea desafíos para una integración más equitativa del conocimiento global. Esta revisión aporta elementos clave para investigadores y tomadores de decisiones al visibilizar patrones, vacíos y trayectorias emergentes en el campo. Se concluye con un llamado a construir marcos teóricos más inclusivos que integren diversidad institucional y contextos locales. Finalmente, se reconoce como limitación principal el sesgo hacia publicaciones angloparlantes en las bases analizadas, lo que abre rutas para investigaciones futuras con mayor representatividad regional.
Descargas
Citas
(1) Abbasi, A.; Altmann, J. & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
(2) Aguilar, L. F. (2007). El aporte de la política pública y de la nueva gestión pública a la gobernanza. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 39, 5-32. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=357533693001
(3) Aguilar, L. F. (2010). Gobernanza: El nuevo proceso de gobernar. Fundación Friedrich Naumann para la Libertad. https://repositorio.21.edu.ar/handle/ues21/12820
(4) Aguilar Villanueva, L. F. (2023). Nueva gobernanza pública: Un panorama conceptual. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 32 (63). https://doi.org/10.18504/pl3263-001-2024
(5) Aguirre, K. A. & Cuervo, D. P. (2023). Water safety and water governance: A scientometric review. Sustainability, 15 (9), 7164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097164
(6) Amore, A. & Hall, C. M. (2016). From governance to meta-governance in tourism? Re-incorporating politics, interests and values in the analysis of tourism governance. Tourism Recreation Research, 41 (2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2016.1151162
(7) Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
(8) Barragán-Paladines, M. J. (2019). Exploring the governability of small-scale fisheries in Ecuador and Galapagos islands under the buen vivir principle. In: Salas, S.; Barragán-Paladines, M. J. & Chuenpagdee, R. (Eds.). Viability and Sustainability of Small-Scale Fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean Vol. 19 (pp. 513-539). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76078-0_22
(9) Bassoli, M. (2010). Local governance arrangements and democratic outcomes (With some evidence from the italian case). Governance, 23 (3), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01491.x
(10) Bavinck, M.; Jentoft, S.; Pascual-Fernández, J. J. & Marciniak, B. (2015). Interactive coastal governance: The role of pre-modern fisher organizations in improving governability. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.012
(11) Bekkers, V.; Dijkstra, G. & Fenger, M. (2016). Governance and the democratic deficit. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585451
(12) Biermann, F. (2007). Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3-4), 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010
(13) Bouckaert, G.; Dooren, W. V.; Verschuere, B.; Voets, J. & Wayenberg, E. (2002). Trajectories for modernizing local governance: Revisiting the flanders case. Public Management Review, 4 (3), 309-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670210151603
(14) Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). Interactive governance for marine conservation: An illustration. Bulletin of Marine Science, 87 (2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2010.1063
(15) Chuenpagdee, R. & Jentoft, S. (2009). Governability assessment for fisheries and coastal systems: A reality check. Human Ecology, 37 (1), 109-120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40603006
(16) Coppedge, M. (2002). Venezuela: Popular sovereignty versus liberal democracy. Kellogg Institute Working Papers. https://kellogg.nd.edu/documents/1587
(17) Crozier, M. J.; Huntington, S. P. & Watanuki, J. (2012). The crisis of democracy. Report on the governability of democracies to the trilateral commission. Sociología Histórica, 1. https://revistas.um.es/sh/article/view/165241
(18) Di Lucia, L. (2013). Too difficult to govern? An assessment of the governability of transport biofuels in the EU. Energy Policy, 63, 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.080
(19) Dilla Alfonso, H. (2001). Los recursos de la gobernabilidad en la Cuenca del Caribe: ¿Hay Alternativas? Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 26 (52), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2001.10874512
(20) Do Carmo, G.; Felizardo, L. F.; De Castro Alcântara, V.; Da Silva, C. A. & Do Prado, J. W. (2023). The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: A scientometric review. Scientometrics, 128 (3), 1853-1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04625-x
(21) Dring, C. C.; Newman, L. & Wittman, H. (2023). Assessing governability of agricultural systems: Municipal agricultural planning in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 855684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.855684
(22) Edelenbos, J. & Van Meerkerk, I. (Eds.). (2016). Critical reflections on interactive governance: Self-organization and participation in public governance. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479078
(23) Fernández-Vidal, D. & Muiño, R. (2014). Fact or fiction? Assessing governance and co-management of marine reserves of fishing interest in Cedeira and Lira (New Spain). Marine Policy, 47, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.016
(24) Frosini, T. E. (2014). Una ley electoral que protege la bipolaridad y favorece la gobernabilidad = An electoral law that protects and promotes bipolarity governance. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 34, 425. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.34.2014.14092
(25) García-Lillo, F.; Úbeda-García, M. & Marco-Lajara, B. (2015). Estructura intelectual de la investigación sobre dirección de recursos humanos: Un análisis bibliométrico aplicado a la revista The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000-2012. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 24 (3), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.07.001
(26) García-Lorenzo, I. & Varela-Lafuente, M. M. (2019). Interacciones de gobernanza en las pesquerías a pequeña escala de Galicia: Percepciones y dinámicas en las cofradías de pescadores. Studies of Applied Economics, 37 (3), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v37i3.2772
(27) Goetz, K. H. (2008). Governance as a path to government. West European Politics, 31 (1-2), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835066
(28) Grisales A. M.; Robledo, S. & Zuluaga, M. (2023). Topic modeling: Perspectives from a literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 4066-4078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232939
(29) Hovik, S. & Bjørn Stokke, K. (2007). Network governance and policy integration-The case of regional coastal zone planning in Norway. European Planning Studies, 15 (7), 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701356647
(30) Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2014). The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33 (4), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002
(31) Hurtado-Marín; V. A., Agudelo-Giraldo, J. D.; Robledo, S. & Restrepo-Parra, E. (2021). Analysis of dynamic networks based on the Ising model for the case of study of co-authorship of scientific articles. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 5721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85041-8
(32) Jäntti, A.; Paananen, H.; Kork, A.-A. & Kurkela, K. (2023). Towards interactive governance: Embedding citizen participation in local government. Administration & Society, 55 (8), 1529-1554. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231177220
(33) Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 31 (4), 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.11.003
(34) Jentoft, S. & Bavinck, M. (2014). Interactive governance for sustainable fisheries: Dealing with legal pluralism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.005
(35) Jentoft, S. & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33 (4), 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002
(36) Jentoft, S. & Chuenpagdee, R. (2015a). Enhancing the Governability of Small-Scale Fisheries Through Interactive Governance. In: Jentoft, S. & Chuenpagdee, R. (Eds.). Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, Vol. 13. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_37
(37) Jentoft, S. & Chuenpagdee, R. (Eds.). (2015b). Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: Global reflections Vol. 13. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3
(38) Jentoft, S.; Chuenpagdee, R.; Bundy, A., & Mahon, R. (2010). Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy, 34 (6), 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.06.004
(39) Jentoft, S.; Van Son, T. C. & Bjørkan, M. (2007). Marine protected areas: A governance system analysis. Human Ecology, 35 (5), 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9125-6
(40) Johnsen, J. P. (2014). Is fisheries governance possible? Fish and Fisheries, 15 (3), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12024
(41) Kemp, R.; Parto, S. & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8 (1-2), 12. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
(42) Kersbergen, K., & Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability, and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43 (2), 143-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x
(43) Kjær, A. M. (2014). Debate on governance in Africa: An emerging political economy paradigm. In: Mudacumura, G.& Morçöl, G. (Eds.). Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries (pp. 19-35). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_2
(44) Koch, P. (2013). Overestimating the shift from government to governance: Evidence from swiss metropolitan areas. Governance, 26 (3), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01600.x
(45) Kooiman, J. (2016). Interactive governance and governability. In: Edelenbos, J. & Van Meerkerk, I. (Eds.). Critical reflections on interactive governance (pp. 29-50). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479078.00007
(46) Kooiman, J.; Bavinck, M.; Chuenpagdee, R.; Mahon, R. & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: an introduction. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7 (1).
(47) Lafferty, W. M. (2004). Chapter 1: Introduction: Form and Function in Governance for Sustainable Development. In: Governance for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421700.00009
(48) Le Galès, P. (2001). Urban governance and policy networks: On the urban political boundedness of policy networks. A french case study. Public Administration, 79 (1), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00251
(49) Limaymanta, C. H.; Zulueta-Rafael, H.; Restrepo-Arango, C. & Alvarez-Muñoz, P. (2020). Análisis bibliométrico y cienciométrico de la producción científica de Perú y Ecuador desde Web of Science (2009-2018). Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 43, 31-52. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i43.7926
(50) Lin, W.; Chan, P. W. K. & Xie, X. (2023). Network governance in Chinese education: The case study of schools in civil aviation industry. Chinese Education & Society, 56 (3-4), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2023.2269814
(51) Linke, S. & Jentoft, S. (2013). A communicative turnaround: Shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 38, 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.011
(52) Lopes, J. (2021). Engagement of csos in the collaborative governance of education policy process in Cabo Verde. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, 41, 91-117. https://doi.org/10.4000/cea.6336
(53) Lorenzi, M. R. & Chuenpagdee, R. (2020). Technological entropy and its implications to fisheries governability. Science of The Total Environment, 724, 137973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137973
(54) Mahon, R.; Fanning, L. & McConney, P. (2009). A governance perspective on the large marine ecosystem approach. Marine Policy, 33 (2), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.07.013
(55) Malinauskaite, L.; Cook, D.; Ariza, E.; Davíðsdóttir, B. & Ögmundardóttir, H. (2022). Interactive governance of whale ecosystem services: Governability assessment of three case studies in the Arctic. Ecology and Society, 27 (2), art22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13307-270222
(56) Marsh, I. (2005). Neo-liberalism and the decline of democratic governance in Australia: A problem of institutional design? Political Studies, 53 (1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00515.x
(57) Mayntz, R. (1993). Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks. Knowledge and Policy, 6 (1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692798
(58) Munévar, M. V. W. (2010). ¿Qué es la gobernanza y para qué sirve? Revista Análisis Internacional, 2, 219-236. https://revistas.utadeo.edu.co/index.php/RAI/article/view/24
(59) Papadopoulos, Y.; Tortola, P. D. & Geyer, N. (2024). Taking stock of the multilevel governance research programme: A systematic literature review. Regional & Federal Studies, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2024.2334470
(60) Peters, B. G.; Pierre, J.; Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2022). A Research Agenda for Governance. Edward Elgar.
(61) Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295143.001.0001
(62) Restrepo-Medina, M. A. & Nieto-Rodríguez, M. A. (2020). Governability or governance in water resource management. The colombian case. Revista Republicana, 28, 159-178. https://doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2020.v28.a81
(63) Robledo, S. et al. (2022). Tree of science with scopus: A shiny application. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 100. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698
(64) Shan, D.; Neis, B. & Sorensen, J. (2023). Introduction to special issue on governance and fishing health and safety in the North Atlantic. Marine Policy, 155, 105729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105729
(65) Song, A. M.; Johnsen, J. P. & Morrison, T. H. (2018). Reconstructing governability: How fisheries are made governable. Fish and Fisheries, 19 (2), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12262
(66) Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282584
(67) Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2021). Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance? Public Management Review, 23 (11), 1590-1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1879914
(68) Valencia-Hernandez, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R.; Duque Mendez, N & Olivar Tast, G. (2020). Sap algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to tree of science. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40 (1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
(69) Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3 (1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158040
(70) Zhang, Y.; Ong, T. S. & Kamarudin, F. (2024). Environmental regulation and corporate environmental performance: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i4.3149
(71) Zuluaga, M.; Robledo, S.; Arbelaez-Echeverri, O.; Osorio-Zuluaga, G & Duque-Méndez. N. (2022). Tree of science - tos: A web-based tool for scientific literature recommendation. Search less, research more! Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 100. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2696
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 William Retamozo Chávez, Rasine Ravelo Méndez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Estudios Políticos autoriza la copia de artículos y textos únicamente con fines académicos, bajo la condición ineludible de citar la fuente. Para la reproducción total o parcial de la Revista con otros fines, se debe contar con la autorización explícita del Instituto de Estudios Políticos de la Universidad de Antioquia, previa consulta al correo electrónico [email protected]
Los autores son los titulares de los derechos morales de sus artículos y pueden archivar y divulgar citando la fuente. Estudios Políticos asume los derechos de reproducción.
El material creado por usted puede ser distribuido, copiado y exhibido por terceros si se muestra en los créditos. No se puede obtener ningún beneficio comercial y las obras derivadas tienen que estar bajo los mismos términos de licencia que el trabajo original.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
