Anthropometric parameters of the working population in Colombia, 1995

Authors

  • Jairo Estrada Universidad de Antioquia
  • Jesús Antonio Camacho Universidad de Antioquia
  • Jesús Antonio Camacho Universidad de Antioquia
  • María Teresa Restrepo Universidad de Antioquia
  • María Teresa Restrepo Universidad de Antioquia
  • Carlos Mario Parra Universidad de Antioquia
  • Carlos Mario Parra Universidad de Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.13412

Keywords:

anthropometric, anthropometric parameters

Abstract

The study consisted on measuring 69 variable anthropométric, in 2100 people, 1315 man and 785 women, in ages that oscillate between the 20 and the 60 years, with the purpose of characterizing the population labor agreement Colombian with its anthropometric, to generate a database anthropométric, to elaborate for each selected variable a chart of having been by age group and sex, to have a work tool that allows later on to use this information in design of work spaces, of work clothes, of equipment of personal protection, of machines
and equipments, and even of special places for the training, the sport, the rest and the social life of the workers. The data were operated statistically for the obtaining of the statistical ones that you/they usually use in the international environment in the field of the anthropometric: percentiles 1, 2.5, 3, 5, 10, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, 97, 97.5 and 99. Then they were organized in charts, a chart for each dimension measured for each sex.
|Abstract
= 1697 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 7087 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1). Bojanini SL. Diseño antropométrico de un puesto de trabajo. Revista Universidad EAFIT 1985.

(2). Bray GA. Obesidad. En: Conocimientos actuales sobre nutrición. 6a. ed. Washington: OPS; 1991. p. 28-46.

(3). Bray GA (ed). Obesity in America. Washington: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1980. p. 1-125

(4). Canadá. Health and Welfare. Canadian Guidelines for Healthy Weight, 1988. p. 37-68

(5). Clark TS, Corlett EN. The ergonomics of workspaces and machines: a desig manual. London: Taylor and Francis; 1984.

(6). Colombia. Departamento Nacional de Estadísticas. Estadística 1990. Bogotá: Dane; 1990.

(7). Comas, J. Manual de antropología física. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas. Sección de Antropología; 1966. p.260

(8). Estrada J. Ergonomía: introducción al análisis del trabajo. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 1993.

(9). Lohman TG et. al. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1982.

(10). Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorrel R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. IIlinois: Human Kinetics; 1988. p. 159

(11). McCormick EJ, Sanders MS. Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw Hill; 1987.

(12). Mora JO, Rodriguez E. Situación nutricional de la población colombiana, 1977-1980. Resultados antropométricos y de laboratorio. Comparación con 1965-1966. En: Estudio Nacional de Salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Medicina; 1982. Vol. I p.36-48.

(13). Paner J, Zelnik M. Las dimensiones humanas en los espacios interiores: estándares antropométricos. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1983.

(14). Pheasant S. Bodyspace. London: Taylor & Francis; 1995.

(15). Sanders MS, McCormick EJ. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 1987.

Published

2012-11-02

How to Cite

1.
Estrada J, Camacho JA, Camacho JA, Restrepo MT, Restrepo MT, Parra CM, Parra CM. Anthropometric parameters of the working population in Colombia, 1995. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública [Internet]. 2012 Nov. 2 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];15(2). Available from: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/13412

Issue

Section

Research