Confiabilidad del cuestionario de calidad de vida en salud SF-36 en Medellín, Colombia

Luz E. Lugo; Héctor I. García; Carlos Gómez

doi:10.17533/udea.rfnsp.243

Autores/as

Luz E. Lugo Universidad de Antioquia
Héctor I. García Universidad de Antioquia
Carlos Gómez Pontificia Universidad Pontificia Javeriana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.243

Palabras clave:

Calidad de vida, calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, escalas de medición, SF-36, fiabilidad

Resumen

Objetivo: evaluar la consistencia interna y la fiabilidad test-retest e interevaluador del cuestionario de calidad de vida en salud SF-36 en pacientes con dolor músculo-esquelético, depresión mayor, diabetes mellitus y personas sanas. Métodos: se aplicó por entrevista y autodiligenciado en 605 personas. Se usaron medidas descriptivas para ítems, escalas y grupos; cálculo de consistencia interna de ítems con sus escalas, fiabilidad de escalas y fiabilidad interobservador e intraobservador. Resultados: los datos omitidos fueron de 0% a 1,5%, las correlaciones ítem-escala superaron 0,48, la fiabilidad fue mayor de 0,70. No hubo diferencias en los puntajes de escalas según tipo de aplicación. La fiabilidad inter-observador fue mayor de 0,80; el test-retest superó el 0,70 y no mostró diferencias significativas en las dos aplicaciones. Discusión: el SF-36 es confiable para evaluar calidad de vida en salud después de adaptarse lingüísticamente en adultos colombianos.

|Resumen

= 1566 veces | PDF

= 463 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Luz E. Lugo, Universidad de Antioquia

Profesora Facultad de Medicina

Héctor I. García, Universidad de Antioquia

Profesor Facultad de Medicina

Carlos Gómez, Pontificia Universidad Pontificia Javeriana

Profesor Facultad de Medicina

Citas

(1). Brock D. Medidas de calidad de vida en el cuidadorock D. Medidas de calidad de vida en el cuidado de la salud y la ética médica. En: Nussbaum MC, Sen A, compiladores. La calidad de vida. México, D. F.: The United Nations University, Fondo de Cul-tura Económica, 1998. p.135-181.

(2). Parfit D. Reasons and persons, citado por Dan Brock. Medidas de la calidad de vida en el cuidado de la salud y la ética médica. En: Nussbaum MC, Sen A, compiladores. La calidad de vida. México, D. F.: The United Nations University, Fondo de Cul-tura Económica, 1998. p. 135-182.

(3). Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of the effects of disablement compo-nents. Spinal Cord 1997;35:829-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100571

(4). Organización Mundial de la Salud, Grupo sobre la Calidad de Vida. ¿Qué calidad de vida? Foro Mun-dial de la Salud 1996;17(4):385-87.

(5). O’Connor R. Development of the health effects scales. Working Paper 43, National Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Melbourne: NHMRC; 1995. p. 3-17.

(6). Spilker B, Revicki DA. Taxonomy of quality of life. En: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmaco-economics in clinical trials. 2.a ed. Filadelfia: Lip-pincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 25-36.

(7). O’Connor R. The development of models for allo-cation ATSIC housing and infrastructure funds. For the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commis-ion. En: O’Connor R. Development of the health ef-fects scales. Working Paper 43. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Melbourne: NHMRC; 1995. p. 3-17.

(8). Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measur-ing Health-related Quality of Life. Ann Int Med 1993;118(8):622-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009

(9). Bergner M, Bobitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and fi-nal revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001

(10). Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Medicina Clínica 1995;104(20):771-776.

(11). Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-ítem short form health survey: I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30(6):473-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

(12). McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psy-chometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31(3):247-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006

(13). McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rachel JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assump-tions, and reliability across diverse patients groups. Med Care 1994;31(1):40-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004

(14). Ware JE Jr. SF-36 Health Survey Update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130-3139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008

(15). Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993. p. 1-31.

(16). Ware JE Jr, Gandek BL, Keller SD, IQOLA Project Group. Evaluating instruments used cross-nation-ally: methods from the IQOLA Project. En: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trial. 2.a ed. Filadelfia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 681-92.

(17). Zung W. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psych 1965;12:63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008

(18). Walter SD, Eliasz M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.3.CO;2-5

(19). Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA Proyect Approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11):945-952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7

(20). Nunnally JC, Bernstein IR. Psychometric theory. 3.aed. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

(21). Stier DM, Greenfield S, Lubeck DP, Dukes KA, Flanders SC, Henning JM et al. Quantifying comor-bidity in a disease-specific cohort: adaptation of the total illness burden index to prostate cancer. Urol-ogy 1999;54(3):424-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00203-4

(22). Eiser C, Kopel S, Cool P, Grimer R. The Perceived Illness Experience Scale (PIE): reliability and va-lidity revisited. Child: Care, Health & Development 1999;25(3):179-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.1999.00116.x

(23). Keller SD, Ware JE, Hatoum HT. The SF-36 Arthri-tis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): II. Tests of valid-ity in four clinical trials. Med Care 1999;60(5Sup-pl):60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199905001-00005

(24). Kosinski M, Keller SD, Ware JE Jr, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative va-lidity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis. Med Care 1999;37(5 Suppl):MS3-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199905001-00003

(25). Thumboo J, Fong KY, Ng TP, Leong KH, Feng PH, Boey ML. Initial construct cross-cultural vali-dation of the Short Form 36 for quality of life as-sessment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine 1997;26(3):282-284.

(26). Durham SR, Sun PP, Sutton LN. Surgically treated lumbar disc disease in the pediatric population: an out-come study. J Neurosurgery 2000;921 Suppl 1:1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2000.92.1.0001

(27). Wagner AK, Ehrenberg BL, Tran TA, Bungay KM, Cynn DJ, Rogers WH. Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its im-pact on epilepsy patients’ care. Quality of Life Re-search 1997;6(4):329-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018479209369

(28). Hermann BP, Vickrey B, Hays RD, Cramer J, Devin-sky O, Meador K et al. A comparison of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy, diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Epilepsy Research 1996;25(2):113-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-1211(96)00024-1

(29). Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz KM, Keller RB, Lew RA, Fossel AH et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted ver-sus unweighted health status measures in carpal tun-nel syndrome. Med Care 1998;36(4):491-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199804000-00005

(30). Krousel-Wood MA. Predicting work status for patients in an occupational medicine setting who report back pain. Archives Family Medicine 1994;3(4):349-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.3.4.349

(31). Wolinsky FD, Wan GJ, Tierney WM. Changes in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disad-vantaged older adults. Med Care 1998;36(11):1589-1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199811000-00008

(32). Kutner NG, Schechtman KB, Ory MG, Baker DI. Older adults’ perceptions of their health and func-tioning in relation to sleep disturbance, falling, and urinary incontinence. FICSIT Group. J Am Geriat-rics Soc 1994;42(7):757-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06537.x

(33). Keller SD, Bayliss MS, Ware JE Jr, Hsu MA, Da-miano AM, Goss TF. Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Serv Res 1997;32(3):367-384.

(34). Lawrence WF, Fryback DG, Martin PA, Klein R, Klein BE. Health status and hypertension: a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49(11):1239-1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00220-X

(35). Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36). En: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeco-nomics in clinical trials. 2.a ed. Filadelfia: Lippin-cott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 337-345.

(36). Rob W., Fisher S., Perkins J. Adaptation and valida-tion of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Australia. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51(11):961-967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00087-0

(37). McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Compari-sons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994;32(6):551-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002

(38). Perkins JJ, Sanson-Fisher RW. An examination of self and telephone-administered modes of admin-istration for the Australian SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51(11):969-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00088-2

(39). Levy KJ. Some multiple range tests for variances. Educ Psychol Measmt 1975;35:599-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447503500308

(40). Ware JE Jr,. Keller SD. Interpreting general health measures. En: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2.a ed. Filadel-fia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 445-460.