Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Spp. strains isolated from pork carcasses on Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.14304Keywords:
nontyphoidal salmonellosis, pig saughter, food safety, antimicrobial resistance, Bauer & KirbyAbstract
Objective: this study was aimed to establish the patterns of antimicrobial resistance in 155 strains of Salmonella spp. isolated from pig carcasses in slaughter house in Colombia. Methodology: using the disc diffusion method (Bauer & Kirby, 1966) we evaluated nine antibiotics: amoxicillinclavulanic acid (30 ug), ampicillin (10 ug), ceftiofur (30 ug), ciprofloxacin (5 ug), chloramphenicol (30 ug), florfenicol (30 ug), gentamicin (10 ug), sulfadiazine / trimethoprim (25 ug) and tetracycline (30 ug). Results: the results confirm the presence of multiresistant strains of Salmonella spp. in pig slaughter house, showing 30 different patterns of multidrug resistance, the most common was ampicillin, amoxicillin, chloramphenicol, florfenicol and tetracycline in 16.77% (n = 26) strains. Tetracycline and florfenicol were less effective with 94.84% (n = 147) and 47.74% (n = 74) of the resistant strains, respectively. Discussion: it must consolidate monitoring programs and surveillance and control systems to prevent the spread of multiresistant strains in foods of animal origin, with an approach of supply chain of pork, as an essential element of food safety system in Colombia.
Downloads
References
(1). Multi-drug resistant Salmonellatyphimurium. Fact Sheet No 139. January 1997
(2). Gray JT, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Long-term survival and infectivity of Salmonellacholeraesuis. Berl Munch TierarztlWochenschr. 2001;114:370–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/safepork-180809-1162
(3). James J. Microbial Hazard Identification in Fresh Fruits and Vege-tables. Wiley Editorial; 2006. p. 46-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470007761
(4). Craig DE, Slauch JM. The Prokaryotes: The Genus Salmone-llaspp.Springer Editorial; 2006. p. 123–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30746-X_7
(5). Cruchaga S, Echeita A, Aladueña A, García-Peña J, Frias N, et al.Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonellae from humans, food and animals in Spain in 1998. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47:315-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/47.3.315
(6). Varma JK, Greene KD, Ovitt J, Barrett TJ, MedallaF,et al. Hos-pitalization and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella outbreaks, 1984–2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:943–946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1106.041231
(7). Organización Mundial de la Salud, 1997; Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal, 2001.INFOSAN: Resistencia Antimicrobiana a Salmonella. Nota de Información INFOSAN 3/2005.
(8). World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Harmonisation of national antimicrobial resistance surveillance and monitoring programmes. 2009. Chapter 6.8.
(9). Rajic ́A, McFall ME, Deckert AE, Reid-Smith R, Manninen K, Poppe C, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from finishing swine and the environment of 60 Alberta swine farms. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 104: 189–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.09.013
(10). Hendriksen RS, Seyfarth AM, Jensen AB, Whichard J, Karlsmose S, Joyce K, et al. Results of Use of WHO Global Salm-Surv Ex-ternal Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of SalmonellaIsolates from 2000 to 2007. J ClinMicro-biol. 2009; 47(1): 79–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00894-08
(11). Bahnson, PB, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Ladely SR, Mateus-Pinilla NE. Herd-level risk factors for Salmonellaenterica subsp. enterica in U.S. market pigs. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006; 76: 249–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.05.009
(12). Pasterán F, Galas M. Manual de Procedimientos Sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos en Salmonella, Shigella y E. coli . Departamento de Bacteriología Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas A.N.L.I.S. “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán”. Centro Regional de Referen-cia WHO-Global SalmSurv para América del Sur. 2008.
(13). Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute.Performance Stan-dards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals.Third Edition. 2008; M31-A3.
(14). World Organisation for Animal Healt (OIE). Manual of Diagnos-tic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial AnimalsResolution No. XX-VIII, 2007.
(15). Hendriksen R, Karlsmose S, Jensen AB, Aarestrup F. The Exter-nal Quality Assurance System of the WHO Global Salm-Surv, 2008. National Food Institute. Technical University of Denmark. [Documento en Internet]. 2009. [Acceso 22 de Febrero de 2012]. Disponible en http://www.food.dtu.dk/Publikationer.aspx
(16). Karczmarczyk M, Martins M, McCusker M, Mattar S, Amaral L, Leonard N, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonellaenterica food and animal isolates from Colombia: Identification of a qnrB19-mediated quinolone resistance marker in two novel serovars. FEMS MicrobiolLett. 2010; 313, 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02119.x
(17). Hur J, et al., Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from food animals: A review.Food ResearchInternational. 2011;[In Press, Corrected Proof] doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.014
(18). Zhao S, White DG, Friedman SL, Glenn A, Blickenstaff K, Ayers SL, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella entericaSerovar HeidelbergIsolates from Retail Meats, Including Poultry, from 2002 to 2006.Applied and Environmental Microbiology. (2008) 74(21): 6656–6662.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01249-08
(19). Foley SL, Lynne AM.Food animals-associated Salmonella cha-llenges: Pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86(E. Suppl.), E173–E187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0447
(20). Quinn PJ,Markey BK,Leonard FC,Carter MC, Donnelly WJ.Microbiología y Enfermedades Infecciosas Veterinarias. Acri-bia Editorial; 2000. Págs. 37 – 46
(21). Reunión conjunta FAO/OMS/OIE de expertos sobre los antimi-crobianos de importancia crítica.Informe de la reunión de exper-tos.Sede de la FAO, Roma (Italia)del 26 al 30 de noviembre de 2007
(22). Reunión conjunta FAO/OMS/OIE de expertos sobre los antimi-crobianos de importancia crítica.Informe de la reunión de exper-tos.Sede de la FAO, Roma (Italia)del 26 al 30 de noviembre de 2007
(23). Berends BR, Van Knapen F, Snijders JMA, MosselDA. Identifi-cation and quantification of risk factors regarding Salmonella spp. on pork carcasses.Int J Food Microbiol. 1997;36 (2-3,20):199-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)01267-1
(24). Parra J, Polanco N, Rangel E, Arguello O, Flórez H, Rojas A. Ca-racterización nutricional, perfil lipídico y buenas prácticas gana-deras para mejorar la calidad de la leche cruda del Piedemonte Llanero para la Industria. Informe Final. 2010
(25). Phillips I, Casewell M, Cox T, De Groot B, Friis C, Jones R, et al. Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to hu-man health? A critical review of published data.J AntimicrobChe-mother. 2004; 53: 28–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg483
(26). World Health Organization (WHO). Global principles for the con-tainment of antimicrobialresistance in animals intended for food.[Documento en Internet] 2000. [Acceso 22 de Febrero de 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/emc/diseases/zoo/who_glo-bal_principles.html.
(27). World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). International Com-mittee of the OIE during its 77th General Session 24 – 29 May 2009. Resolution N° 24. Animal Production Food Safety.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Paula M. Bermúdez D., Sandra M. Rincón G., Martha C. Suárez A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The contents of the articles are the responsibility of the authors
The editorial committee has editorial independence from the National School of Public Health "Héctor Abad Gómez" of the University of Antioquia.
The editorial committee is not responsible for aspects related to copying, plagiarism or fraud that may appear in the articles published in it.
When you are going to reproduce and disclose photographs or personal data in printed or digital format, informed consent is required. Therefore, this requirement is required of the author at the time of receipt of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions to reproduce any material protected by reproduction rights.
The authors preserve the moral rights and assign the economic rights that will correspond to the University of Antioquia, to publish it, distribute electronic copies, include them in indexing services, directories or national and international databases in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution license -Not Commercial-Share Equal 4.0 International Commercial (CC BY-NC-SA) which allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from the work in a non-commercial way, as long as the respective credit and license are granted. new creations under the same conditions.
The authors will sign the declaration of transfer of economic rights to the University of Antioquia, after the acceptance of the manuscript.
The editorial committee reserves the right to reject the articles whose authors do not offer satisfactory explanations about the contribution of each author, to meet the criteria of authorship in the submission letter. All authors must meet the four criteria of authorship according to ICMJE: "a) .- That there is a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the article or to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. b) That they have participated in the design of the research work or in the critical review of its intellectual content. c) .- That has been intervened in the approval of the final version that will be published.d). That they have the capacity to respond to all aspects of the article in order to ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are adequately investigated and resolved. "
-- 
--
