Perceptions of Students, Instructors and Teachers of Three University Programs Regarding Virtualization and In-person Human Anatomy Courses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 and 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.321Keywords:
Coronavirus Infections, Educational Personnel, Nursing Education, Perception, Undergraduate Medical EducationAbstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about dizzying changes in higher education environments, incorporating hybrid modalities for the delivery of courses and classes.
Objective: To describe and understand the perceptions of students, monitors, and professors of three undergraduate programs within the period 2020–2021 on adaptations and methodologies between virtualization and in-person implementation in anatomy courses during the pandemic period.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, based on the voluntary completion of surveys, aimed at determining the degree of satisfaction, fulfillment of expectations, choice of modality, and assessment of pros and cons regarding the virtual and in-person adaptations carried out.
Results: A sample of 567 participants was collected, of which 541 were students (95.4%) and 26 were teachers and instructors (4.6%). Among the main findings, one of the advantages reported by teachers was the savings on transportation, in contrast to the disadvantage of not getting to know the students. From the students’ perspective, the human connection was viewed positively, while the lack of access to laboratories was identified as a negative aspect.
Conclusions: The pandemic has had —and will continue to have— multisectoral impacts, opening the discussion on whether virtualization should be regarded as the sole path for the evolution of educational processes and models, or if its limitations should instead be questioned and addressed.
Downloads
References
(1) Liu YC, Kuo RL, Shih SR. COVID-19: The first documented coronavirus pandemic in history. Biomed J [Internet]. 2020;43(4):328-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.04.007
(2) Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA [Internet]. 2020;324(8):782-793. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12839
(3) Kaul V, Gallo-de Moraes A, Khateeb D, Greenstein Y, Winter G, Chae J, et al. Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Chest [Internet]. 2021;159(5):1949-1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.026
(4) Kolahchi Z, De Domenico M, Uddin LQ, Cauda V, Grossmann I, Lacasa L, et al. COVID-19 and Its Global Economic Impact. Adv Exp Med Biol [Internet]. 2021;1318:825-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63761-3_46
(5) Kumar R, Singh R. Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education. Surg Radiol Anat [Internet]. 2020;42(3):355-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02331-7
(6) Suárez-Escudero JC, Posada-Jurado MC, Bedoya-Muñoz LJ, Urbina-Sánchez AJ, Morales JLF, Bohórquez-Gutiérrez CA. Enseñar y aprender anatomía: modelos pedagógicos, historia, presente y tendencias. Acta Med Colomb [Internet]. 2020;45(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2020.1898
(7) Parslow GR. Virtual universities are not about to replace face-to-face teaching. Biochem Mol Biol Educ [Internet]. 2005;33(2):141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2005.494033022436
(8) Chandran DS, Kaur S, Deepak KK. Student perceptions on synchronous virtual versus face-to-face teaching for leader-centered and participant-centered postgraduate activities during COVID-19. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2021;45(3):554-562. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00226.2020
(9) Tran C, Toth-Pal E, Ekblad S, Fors U, Salminen H. A virtual patient model for students' interprofessional learning in primary healthcare. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(9):e0238797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238797
(10) Anderson V. Academic During a Pandemic: Reflections from a Medical Student on Learning During SARS-CoVid-2. HEC Forum [Internet]. 2021;33(1-2):35-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09439-7
(11) Suárez-Escudero JC, Bedoya-Muñoz LJ, Posada-Jurado MC, Arboleda-Carmona EP, Urbina-Sánchez AJ, Ramírez-Burgos S, et al. Percepción de los estudiantes sobre adaptaciones virtuales en cursos de anatomía humana por la contingencia SARS-CoV-2. Academia y Virtualidad [Internet]. 2021;14(1):151-168. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.5275
(12) Seymour-Walsh AE, Bell A, Weber A, Smith T. Adapting to a new reality: COVID-19 coronavirus and online education in the health professions. Rural Remote Health [Internet]. 2020;20(2):6000. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6000
(13) Ortiz PA. Teaching in the time of COVID-19. Biochem Mol Biol Educ [Internet]. 2020;48(3):201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21348
(14) Brassett C, Cosker T, Davies DC, Dockery P, Gillingwater TH, Lee TC, et al. COVID-19 and anatomy: Stimulus and initial response. J Anat [Internet]. 2020;237(3):393-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13274
(15) Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat [Internet]. 2021;34(1):108-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23655
(16) Böckers A, Claassen H, Haastert-Talini K, Westermann J. Teaching anatomy under COVID-19 conditions at German universities: recommendations of the teaching commission of the anatomical society. Ann Anat [Internet]. 2021;234:151669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151669
(17) Ooi SZY, Ooi R. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic on the future of cadaveric dissection anatomical teaching. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2020;25(1):1823089. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1823089
(18) Biasutto SN, Cuadrado L, Novillo JP, Postacchini M de la P, Barneix VS, Viccini MM, et al. Educación médica y pandemia: valoración de los cambios impuestos por las restricciones de la pandemia en la docencia-aprendizaje de la anatomía según los estudiantes de primer año de medicina. Rev argent anat clín [Internet]. 2021;13(2):67-78. https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v13.n2.33382
(19) Yoo H, Kim D, Lee YM, Rhyu IJ. Adaptations in Anatomy Education during COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci [Internet]. 2021;36(1):e13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33398947/
(20) Koama A, Yaméogo SLC, Yaméogo BP, Windsouri M, Djiguemdé A, Zongo N, et al. Moodle, a credible alternative pedagogy for teaching medicine in a tropical environment to address large numbers and pandemic situations? Med Trop Sante Int [Internet]. 2021;1(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.48327/mtsimagazine.n1.2021.76
(21) Iglesias-Rodríguez A, Olmos-Migueláñez S, Torrecilla-Sánchez EM, Mena-Marco JJ. Evaluar para optimizar el uso de la plataforma moodle (studium) en el departamento de didáctica, organización y métodos de investigación. Tend Pedagó [Internet]. 2014;23:155-170. Disponible en: https://revistas.uam.es/tendenciaspedagogicas/article/view/2077
(22) Gaceta, Facultad de Medicina. El modelo híbrido: una alternativa para la educación y la evaluación [Internet]. [citado 2022 Nov 25]. Disponible en: https://gaceta.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/2020/10/01/el-modelo-hibrido-una-alternativa-para-la-educacion-y-la-evaluacion/
(23) Souza AD, Kotian SR, Pandey AK, Rao P, Kalthur SG. Cadaver as a first teacher: A module to learn the ethics and values of cadaveric dissection. J Taibah Univ Med Sci [Internet]. 2020;15(2):94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.03.002
(24) Asante EA, Maalman RS, Ali MA, Donkor YO, Korpisah JK. Perception and Attitude of Medical Students towards Cadaveric Dissection in Anatomical Science Education. Ethiop J Health Sci [Internet]. 2021;31(4):867-874. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.22
(25) Stephens GC, Rees C, Lazarus M. How does Donor Dissection Influence Medical Students' Perceptions of Ethics? A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Qualitative Study. Anat Sci Educ [Internet]. 2019;12(4):332-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1877
(26) Han BC. No-Cosas. Quiebras del mundo de hoy. Bogotá D.C.: Taurus; 2021. 139 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iatreia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Papers published in the journal are available for use under the Creative Commons license, specifically Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
The papers must be unpublished and sent exclusively to the Journal Iatreia; the author uploading the contribution is required to submit two fully completed formats: article submission and authorship responsibility.
