Educational Interventions in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Health Care Settings. A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e15Keywords:
diabetes mellitus, type 2, primary health care, patient education as topic, self-care, primary care nursingAbstract
Objective. To synthesize the evidence of studies with educational interventions for adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in primary health care settings.
Methods. A scoping review was conducted following the recommendations by the Joanna Briggs Institute and by the PRISMA declaration. The protocol was registered in INPLASY20215009. The search was carried out in: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, and grey literature.
Results. Seventeen studies were included; most were randomized clinical trials of which 65% were conducted in high-income countries, and all the studies represented 5 656 participants. The results showed four big categories derived from educational interventions: therapeutic adherence (significant results on the satisfaction with the treatment); self-care and self-management in diabetes (improvement in self-efficacy, empowerment, and disease awareness); glycemic control in diabetes (significant results in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin); nursing and its role in the educational interventions on patients with DM2 (guidance in restructuring behaviors).
Conclusion. The findings of this review suggest that educational interventions on patients with DM2 within the setting of primary health care can impact positively on therapeutic adherence, self-control, and knowledge of the disease. Moreover, it was possible to identify the influence of multidisciplinary health teams, where the relevance of nursing professionals in the construction and implementation of educational interventions is evidenced in obtaining better health results.
Downloads
References
1. Pan American Health Organization. Enfermedades no transmisibles [Internet]; 2021 (cited 25 Apr 2023). Available from: https://www.paho.org/es/temas/enfermedades-no-transmisibles
2. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018; 138:271–81.
3. He X, Li J, Wang B, Yao Q, Li L, Song R, et al. Diabetes self-management education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017; 55(3):712–31.
4. Caro-Bautista J, Kaknani-Uttumchandani S, García-Mayor S, Villa-Estrada F, Morilla-Herrera JC, León-Campos Á, et al. Impact of self-care programmes in type 2 diabetes mellitus population in primary health care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Nurs. 2020; 29(9–10):1457–76.
5. Ferguson S, Swan M, Smaldone A. Does Diabetes Self-management Education in Conjunction With Primary Care Improve Glycemic Control in Hispanic Patients?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2015; 41(4):472–84.
6. The Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Joanne Briggs Institute. 2015. p:1–24.
7. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018; 169(7):467–73.
8. Castillo-Merino Y, Ospina-Ayala C, Rodríguez-Acelas AL, Cañon-Montañez W. Educational Interventions in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Health Care Settings: A Scoping Review Protocol. Inplasy Protoc. 2021: 202150091.
9. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5928.
10. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Levels of Evidence FAME. JBI approach. 2014:2–6. Available from:
http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au
11. McGuinness LA. “robvis: An R package and web application for visualising risk-of-bias assessments” [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://mcguinlu.shinyapps.io/robvis/
12. Pérez-Escamilla R, Damio G, Chhabra J, Fernandez ML, Segura-Pérez S, Vega-López S, et al. Impact of a community health workers-led structured program on blood glucose control among latinos with type 2 diabetes: the DIALBEST trial. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(2):197–205.
13. Chen S, Qian D, Burström K, Burström B. Impact of an educational intervention in primary care on fasting blood glucose levels and diabetes knowledge among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural China. Patient Educ. Couns. 2020; 103(9):1767–73.
14. De la Fuente Coria MC, Cruz-Cobo C, Santi-Cano MJ. Effectiveness of a primary care nurse delivered educational intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in promoting metabolic control and compliance with long-term
therapeutic targets: Randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020; 101:103417.
15. Presley C, Agne A, Shelton T, Oster R, Cherrington A. Mobile-Enhanced Peer Support for African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2020; 35(10):2889–96.
16. White RO, Chakkalakal RJ, Wallston KA, Wolff K, Gregory B, Davis D, et al. The Partnership to Improve Diabetes Education Trial: a Cluster Randomized Trial Addressing Health Communication in Diabetes Care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2020; 35(4):1052–9.
17. Sharoni SKA, Rahman HA, Minhat HS, Shariff-Ghazali S, Ong MHA. The effects of self-efficacy enhancing program on foot self-care behaviour of older adults with diabetes: A randomised controlled trial in elderly care facility, Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3): e0192417.
18. Santos JC, Cortez DN, Macedo MML, Reis EA, Reis IA, Torres HC. Comparison of education group strategies and home visits in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trial. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2017; 25:e2979
19. Paz-Pacheco E, Sandoval MA, Ardena GJ, Paterno E, Juban N, Lantion-Ang FL, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) program in a rural agricultural setting. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2017; 18(1):35–49.
20. Grillo M de FF, Neumann CR, Scain SF, Rozeno RF, Beloli L, Perinetto T, et al. Diabetes education in primary care: a randomized clinical trial. Cad. Saude Publica. 2016;32(5):S0102-311X2016000500502.
21. Merakou K, Knithaki A, Karageorgos G, Theodoridis D, Barbouni A. Group patient education: effectiveness of a brief intervention in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary health care in Greece: a clinically controlled trial. Health Educ. Res. 2015; 30(2):223–32.
22. Ruggiero L, Riley BB, Hernandez R, Quinn LT, Gerber BS, Castillo A, et al. Medical assistant coaching to support diabetes self-care among low-income racial/ethnic minority populations: randomized controlled trial. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2014; 36(9):1052–73.
23. Plotnikoff RC, Eves N, Jung M, Sigal RJ, Padwal R, Karunamuni N. Multicomponent, home-based resistance training for obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Obes. 2010; 34(12):1733–41.
24. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Ballew SH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(9):1934–42.
25. Sönnichsen AC, Winkler H, Flamm M, Panisch S, Kowatsch P, Klima G, et al. The effectiveness of the Austrian disease management programme for type 2 diabetes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam. Pract. 2010; 11:86.
26. Gaillard T, Amponsah G, Osei K. Patient-Centered Community Diabetes Education Program Improves Glycemic Control in African-American Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Importance of Point of Care MetabolicMeasurements. J. Natl. Black Nurses Assoc. 2015; 26(1):50–7.
27. Gehlawat M, Lakshminarayanan S, Kar SS. Structured Diabetes Education Program for Improving Self-care Behavior in Primary Care Settings of Puducherry: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J. Community Med. 2019; 44(2):107–12.
28. Romero Guevara SL, Parra DI, Rojas LZ. “Teaching: Individual” to increase adherence to therapeutic regimen in people with hypertension and type-2 diabetes: Protocol of the controlled clinical trial ENURSIN. BMC Nurs. 2019; 18:22.
29. Najafpour Z, Zeidi IM, Kalhor R. The effect of educational intervention on medication adherence behaviour in patients with type 2 diabetes: Application of social marketing model. Clin. Diabetol. 2021; 10(4):359–69.
30. Coppola A, Sasso L, Bagnasco A, Giustina A, Gazzaruso C. The role of patient education in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: an overview. Endocrine. 2016; 53(1):18–27.
31. Odgers-Jewell K, Ball LE, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of group-based self-management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses and meta-regression.Diabet. Med. 2017;34(8):1027–39.
32. Haider R, Sudini L, Chow CK, Cheung NW. Mobile phone text messaging in improving glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019; 150:27–37.
33. Choi TST, Davidson ZE, Walker KZ, Lee JH, Palermo C. Diabetes education for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2016; 116:218–29.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-08-24 (2)
- 2023-06-20 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
