Benefits of using ad-hoc inventory management models in the presence of return flows

Authors

  • Juan Pedro Sepúlveda Rojas Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception
  • Felipe Baesler Abufarde Development University
  • Domingo Antonio Núñez Morales University of Talca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.14730

Keywords:

reverse logistics, inventory management, coordination

Abstract

In this work we analyze the impact of reverse logistics in inventory management models through the analysis of implications and extensions of some literature models. Through experimentation with deterministic inventory models we found that in most cases, the traditional inventory management costs are higher than the models considering return flows. Only in few cases, mainly when the recoverable inventory holding cost was very high in relation to the serviceable inventory holding cost, the benefits of ad-hoc models was negligible. We also observe that there is no quantitative comparison in the literature between a traditional inventory management and one which considers return flows.

|Abstract
= 451 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 143 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan Pedro Sepúlveda Rojas, Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception

Faculty of Engineering.

Felipe Baesler Abufarde, Development University

Faculty of Engineering.

Domingo Antonio Núñez Morales, University of Talca

Faculty of Engineering.

References

S. Mitra. “A Survey of Third-party Logistics (3PL) Service Providers in India”. IIMB Management Review. Vol. 18. 2006. pp. 159-174.

R. C. Savaskan, S. Bhattacharya, L. N. Van Wassenhove. “Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing”. Management Science. Vol. 50. 2004. pp. 239-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186

D. S. Rogers, R. S. Tibben-Lembke. Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices. RLEC Press. Pittsburgh (PA). 1999. pp. 275.

M. Fleischmann, J. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, R. Dekker, E. Van Der Laan, J. Van Nunen, L. Van Wassenhove. “Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 103. 1997. pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0

D. A. Schrady. “A deterministic inventory model for reparable items”. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. Vol. 14. 1967. pp. 391-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800140310

R. Teunter. “Lot-sizing for inventory systems with product recovery”. Computers & Industrial Engineering. Vol. 46. 2004. pp. 431-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.01.006

M. Mabini, L. Pintelon, L. Gelders. “EOQ type formulations for controlling repairable inventories”. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 28. 1992. pp. 21-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(92)90110-S

R. Kleber, S. Minner, G. Kiesmüller. “A continuous time inventory model for a product recovery system with multiple options”. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 79. 2002. pp. 121-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00256-6

Q. He, E. Jewkes, J. Buzacott. “The value of information used in inventory control of a make-to-order inventory-production system”. IIE Transactions. Vol. 34. 2002. pp. 999-1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170208928929

S. Rubio. “El sistema de logística inversa en la empresa: Análisis y Aplicaciones”. Tesis de doctorado. Departamento de economía aplicada y organización de empresas. Universidad de Extremadura. 2003. pp. 102-221.

A. Díaz, M. J. Álvarez, P. González. “Logística Inversa y medio ambiente”. Aspectos estratégicos y operativos. Ed. McGraw-Hill. Madrid. 2004. pp. 253- 353.

Published

2013-03-01

How to Cite

Sepúlveda Rojas, . J. P., Baesler Abufarde, F., & Núñez Morales, D. A. (2013). Benefits of using ad-hoc inventory management models in the presence of return flows. Revista Facultad De Ingeniería Universidad De Antioquia, (55), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.14730