HOW TO ANALYZE THE SOCIAL POSITIONOF THE INTELLECTUAL IN COLOMBIA?CULTURAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Authors

  • Juan Zapata university of Liege

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.14538

Keywords:

cultural institution, material and symbolic capital, autonomy, power relations

Abstract

Taking the theoretical approaches provided by Pierre Bourdieu, Jacques Dubois, Pascale Casanova and Rafael Gutiérrez Girardot as a basis, this article establishes a set of methodological principles not only for the analysis of an intellectual’s career path, but also of his stance in relation to aesthetic, economic and political fields, according to his position in society. This stance is covered in three ways: firstly, the position of the intellectual as part of the cultural institution; secondly the position of the aforementioned cultural institution in field of political power; and thirdly, the position that the country in question occupies in the world map of cultural production. Ultimately, the article proposes a blueprint for the explanation of the possible pathways that a Colombian intellectual could have followed between entering onto the scene at the end of the 19th Century, and the present day.

|Abstract
= 196 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 63 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boschetti, Anna. (2010). L’espace culturel transnational. Paris: Nouveau Monde édition.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1971). “Le marché de biens symboliques”, L’Année sociologique, 22, 49-126.

---. (1975). “L’invention de la vie d’artiste”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, (1), 2, 67-93.

---. (1998). Les Règles de l’art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Seuil.

Brissette, Pascal. (2005). La Malediction littéraire. Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montreal.

Casanova, Pascale. (2008). La République mondiale des lettres. Paris: éditions du Seuil.

Dubois, Jacques. (1979). L’institution de la littérature. Bruxelles: Nathan/Labor.

Glinoer, Anthony. (2008). La Querelle de la camaraderie littéraire. Les romantiques face à leurs contemporains. Genève: Droz.

Gutiérrez Girardot, Rafael. (1989). Temas y problemas de una Historia social de la literatura hispanoamericana. Bogotá: Ediciones Cave Canem.

---. (1992). La formación del intelectual hispanoamericano en el siglo XIX. Maryland: University of Maryland all College Park.

---. (2004). Modernismo. Supuestos históricos y culturales. Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Loaiza Cano, Gilberto. (2006). “La búsqueda de autonomía del campo literario. El Mosaico, Bogotá, 1858-1872”, Boletín cultural y bibliográfico, (XLI), 67. En: http://www.banrepcultural.org/blaavirtual/publicacionesbanrep/boletin/boletin67/bol0a.htm

Said, Edward. (2007). Representaciones del intelectual. Bogotá: Debate.

Ureña, Pedro Henríquez. (2001). Las corrientes literarias en la América Hispánica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Vaillant, Alain. (2011). “Entre persona y personaje. El dilema del autor moderno”, Linguística y Literatura, 60, 19-33.

Villegas, Jean-Claude. (2007). Paris, capitale littéraire de l’Amérique latine. Dijon: EUD.

Published

2013-02-20

How to Cite

Zapata, J. (2013). HOW TO ANALYZE THE SOCIAL POSITIONOF THE INTELLECTUAL IN COLOMBIA?CULTURAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS. Lingüística Y Literatura, 33(62), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.14538

Issue

Section

Literary studies