Cross-cultural adaptation of research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.13499Keywords:
Temporormandibular disorders, Validity and reliability, Hispanic Americans, Cross-cultural comparisonsAbstract
Introduction: the goal of this study was to establish the cross-cultural adaptation of Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Methods: with a test-retest design, this study evaluated the psychometric properties of RDC/TMD in their Spanish version. Bilingual subjects were evaluated in order to test consistency between the Spanish and English versions of the instrument, including axis I (clinical conditions of TMD) and axis II (psychosocial aspects related to TMD). Results: the reliability of axis I test re-test for diagnosis classification was excellent (Kappa = 1,0). The reliability analysis of axis I test-retest for classifying different diagnoses was also excellent (Kappa = 1,0). Concerning axis II, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) (0,96) as well as for Jaw Disability Checklist (JDC) (0,77), depression (0,87), and nonspecific physical symptoms (0,98). Also, Cronbach’s Alpha for JDC was calculated (0,89). Spearman correlations among axis II reagents showed a median of correlation of 0.50 (0.293 to 0.856) with high values between JDC and GCPS. These correlations provide support for internal consistency of RDC/TMD in Spanish. Conclusion: the demonstrated validity and reliability of the RDC/TMD lie in thier psychometric properties. The cross-cultural adaptation of this instrument allows its use in Spanish-speaking populations for the assessment of the role of TMD in this population.
Downloads
References
De Leeuw R, Pain AAOO. Orofacial pain. Chicago: Quintessence; 2008.
LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol M 1997; 8(3): 291-305.
Isong U, Gansky S. Temporomandibular joint and muscle disorder-type pain in U. S. adults: the National Health Interview Survey. J Orofac Pain 2008; 22(4): 317-322.
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. TMJ Disorders. [Internet]. USA: National Institutes of Health. 2013 [Consulta 07 Enero 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/OralHealth/Topics/TMJ/TMJDisorders.htm
Gonzalez YM. Are temporomandibular disorders a public health problem? Alpha Omegan 2003; 96(2): 11-14.
Lund J, Lavigne G, Dubner R. Orofacial pain from basic sciences to clinical management Chicago: Quintessence; 2001.
Slade GD, Bair E, By K, Mulkey F, Baraian C, Rothwell R et al. Study methods, recruitment, sociodemographic findings, and demographic representativeness in the OPPERA study. J Pain 2011; 12(11): T12-T26.
Dworkin S, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations. J Craniomandib Disord 1992; 6(4): 301-355.
Goulet JP, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP. Jaw pain prevalence among French-speaking Canadians in Quebec and related symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1995; 74(11): 1738-1744.
Lobbezoo-Scholte AM, De Leeuw JR, Steenks MH, Bosman F, Buchner R, Olthoff LW. Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part I: Self-report data and clinical findings. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9(1): 24-36.
Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:453-462.
Undt G, Murakami KI, Clark GT, Ploder O, Dem A, Lang T et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the JPF-Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with functional temporomandibular joint disorders. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34(4): 226-233.
Frank-Stromborg M, Olsen S. Instruments for Clinical Health-Care Research. [libro electrónico]. Canadá: Jones and Barlett Publishers Canadá; 1997 [Consultado 25 Septiembre 2012]. Disponible en: http://books.google.com.mx/books?id=X0SYDt2KWBkC&printsec=copyright&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(12): 1417-1432.
Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scandinavian J Rheumatol 1995; 24(2): 61-63.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. New York: American Academy of Orthopedics. Surgeons Institute for Work & Health; 1998.
Escalante A, Lichtenstein MJ, Ríos N, Hazuda HP. Measuring chronic rheumatic pain in Mexican Americans: cross-cultural adaptation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49(12): 1389-1399.
Lázaro C, Caseras X, Whizar-Lugo VM, Wenk R, Baldioceda F, Bernal R et al. Psychometric properties of a spanish version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in several spanish-speaking countries. Clin J Pain 2001; 17(4):365.
Hilton A, Skrutkowski M. Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing 2002; 25(1): 1-7.
Geisinger KF. Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment 1994; 6(4): 304-312.
Peña E. Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development 2007; 78(4): 1255-1264.
Dworkin S, Sherman J, Mancl L, Ohrbach R, Le Resche L, Truelove E. Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders axis II scales: depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain. J Orofac Pain 2002; 16: 207-220.
González Y. Criterios diagnósticos para la investigación de los trastornos temporomandibulares CDI/TTM. [Monografía en Internet]. New York: University at Buffalo; 2003. [Consultado 25 Septiembre 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.rdc-tmdinternational.org/Portals/18/Translations_RDC/RDC-Spanish.pdf.
John MT, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Dworkin SF. Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process. J Orofac Pain 2006; 20(1): 43-52.
Lobbezoo F, van Selms MKA, John MT, Huggins K, Ohrbach R, Vissder CM et al. Use of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders for multinational research: translation efforts and reliability assessments in The Netherlands. J Orofac Pain 2005; 19(4): 301-308.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1): 159-174.
Mandrekar JN. Measures of interrater agreement. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6(1): 6-7.
Leher A, Graf K, PhoDuc J-M, Rammelsberg P. Is there a difference in the reliable measurement of temporomandibular disorder signs between experienced and inexperienced examiners? J Orofac Pain 2005; 19(1): 58-64.
Di Eugenio B. On the usage of Kappa to evaluate agreement on coding tasks. [Internet]. [Consultado 25 Septiembre 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.nlp.cs.uic.edu/PS-papers/lrec00.pdf
Di Eugenio B, Glass M. The Kappa statistic: a second look. Computational linguistics 2004; 30(1): 95-101.
Passonneau R, Habash N. Inter-annotator agreement on a multilingual semantic annotation task. Center for Computational Learning Systems. Columbia: University New York; 2006.
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37(5): 360-363.
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85(3): 257-268.
Andrés AM, Marzo PF. Chance-corrected measures of reliability and validity in K x K tables. Stat Methods Med Res 2005; 14(5): 473-492.
Anderson G, Gonzalez Y, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Sommers E, Look JO et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. VI: future directions. J Orofac Pain 2010; 24(1): 79-88.
Dworkin SF. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: current status & future relevance. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37(10): 734-743.
Look JO, John MT, Tai F, Huggins K, Leton PA, Truelove E et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures. J Orofac Pain 2010; 24(1): 25-34.
de Lucena LBS, Kosminsky M, da Costa LJ, de Góes PSA. Validation of the Portuguese version of the RDC/TMD Axis II questionnaire. Braz Oral Res 2006; 20(4): 312-317.
Shojima K, Toyoda H. Estimation of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 2002; 73(3): 227-233.
Bravo G, Potvin L. Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach’s Alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: Toward the integration of two traditions. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44(4-5): 381-390.
Fleiss JL, Levin BA, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New Jersey: Wiley; 2003.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Muñoz C, de Santillana I. Confiabilidad y validez de la SCL-90 en la evaluación de psicopatología en mujeres. Salud Mental 2005; 28(3): 42-50.
Schmitter M, Ohlmann B, John MT, Hirsch C, Rammelsberg P. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a calibration and reliability study. Cranio 2005; 23(3): 212-218.
Khoo SP, Yap AUJ, Chan YH, Bulgiba AM. Translating the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders into Malay: evaluation of content and process. J Orofac Pain 2008; 22(2): 131-138.
John MT, Dworkin SF, Mancl LA. Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Pain 2005; 118(1-2): 61-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Copyright comprises moral and patrimonial rights.
1. Moral rights: are born at the moment of the creation of the work, without the need to register it. They belong to the author in a personal and unrelinquishable manner; also, they are imprescriptible, unalienable and non negotiable. Moral rights are the right to paternity of the work, the right to integrity of the work, the right to maintain the work unedited or to publish it under a pseudonym or anonymously, the right to modify the work, the right to repent and, the right to be mentioned, in accordance with the definitions established in article 40 of Intellectual property bylaws of the Universidad (RECTORAL RESOLUTION 21231 of 2005).
2. Patrimonial rights: they consist of the capacity of financially dispose and benefit from the work trough any mean. Also, the patrimonial rights are relinquishable, attachable, prescriptive, temporary and transmissible, and they are caused with the publication or divulgation of the work. To the effect of publication of articles in the journal Revista de la Facultad de Odontología, it is understood that Universidad de Antioquia is the owner of the patrimonial rights of the contents of the publication.
The content of the publications is the exclusive responsibility of the authors. Neither the printing press, nor the editors, nor the Editorial Board will be responsible for the use of the information contained in the articles.
I, we, the author(s), and through me (us), the Entity for which I, am (are) working, hereby transfer in a total and definitive manner and without any limitation, to the Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, the patrimonial rights corresponding to the article presented for physical and digital publication. I also declare that neither this article, nor part of it has been published in another journal.
Open Access Policy
The articles published in our Journal are fully open access, as we consider that providing the public with free access to research contributes to a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Creative Commons License
The Journal offers its content to third parties without any kind of economic compensation or embargo on the articles. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, known as Attribution – NonCommercial – Share Alike (BY-NC-SA), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited and that the new productions are licensed under the same conditions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
